[Bug 33961] cross reference to a list number, dot bug

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33961

--- Comment #18 from albertwilliams  ---
The LibreOffice bug report on SVG image handling in Writer highlights the
complexities of software development. For those working on assignments in
software engineering or bug tracking, understanding these issues is crucial. If
you need help analyzing or writing about software bugs, seek assignment writing
help https://www.theresearchguardian.com/ie/ from experts for guidance on
crafting informative and well-structured assignments.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161746] With Ultrawide/High resolution display "Personalised" themes scaling leaves "unstyled" section

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161746

--- Comment #2 from benjaminwint...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 194915
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194915=edit
1080p screen snip

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161746] With Ultrawide/High resolution display "Personalised" themes scaling leaves "unstyled" section

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161746

--- Comment #1 from benjaminwint...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 194914
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194914=edit
Ultrawide screen snip

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161746] New: With Ultrawide/High resolution display "Personalised" themes scaling leaves "unstyled" section

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161746

Bug ID: 161746
   Summary: With Ultrawide/High resolution display "Personalised"
themes scaling leaves "unstyled" section
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: trivial
  Priority: medium
 Component: UI
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: benjaminwint...@gmail.com

Description:
when display has a display width significantly higher than 1080p (such as with
some 2k and 4k displays) the texture used in "Options -> Personalisation" do
not span the tool bar completely. this applies to all "LibreOffice" sub
programs (writer, spreadsheet, etc). changing the window width will exaggerate
or reduce the effect accordingly.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.enforce a "high resolution" width (2k+)
2.under "options -> Personalisation" set a "preinstalled theme" (any)
3.note the untextured section to the top left. if effect is not visible,
stretch the width of the window until it is (window may have to exceed display
width depending on display hardware)

Actual Results:
N/A

Expected Results:
N/A


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Version: 24.2.4.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 51a6219feb6075d9a4c46691dcfe0cd9c4fff3c2
CPU threads: 24; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: en-AU (en_AU); UI: en-GB
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 105584] [META] Calc image bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105584

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||134216


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134216
[Bug 134216] Indication box displayed when inserting picture
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 134216] Indication box displayed when inserting picture

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134216

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||105584

--- Comment #5 from BogdanB  ---
Also in
Version: 24.2.4.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 51a6219feb6075d9a4c46691dcfe0cd9c4fff3c2
CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105584
[Bug 105584] [META] Calc image bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161473] Impress stops playing sound files every new sesssion

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161473

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161421] Not all hyphenation separators (hyphens) are displayed

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161421

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158162] Enter lowercase text to cell

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158162

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158162] Enter lowercase text to cell

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158162

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Peter Wicker,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 71463] UI: Frame with nowrap and follow text misbehave when moved to the next page

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71463

--- Comment #13 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 149082] Worse text rendering in a line with a formula in Writer - LibreOffice 7.3

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149082

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Tonio Tanzi,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 131495] Unable to open subdirectory in root directory of SMB share

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131495

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Ettore Atalan,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 134216] Indication box displayed when inserting picture

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134216

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear NSO LibreOffice Team,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 146673] H2 database version 2.x - PUBLIC schema tables no longer displayed in UI

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146673

--- Comment #15 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Maciej Morycinski,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 124000] FILEOPEN DOCX Last row of OLE object table is missing because rows taller in LO

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124000

--- Comment #21 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear NISZ LibreOffice Team,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 112644] UI: Disable "New Master" and "Delete Master" commands in slide pane and slide sorter view

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112644

--- Comment #8 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Regina Henschel,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 108564] Empty Security Warning on Linux (git build)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108564

--- Comment #11 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Xisco Faulí,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160543] Quickfind sidebar: Search depends on F settings

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160543

--- Comment #10 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to Jim Raykowski from comment #9)
> Created attachment 194913 [details]
> Demo of search options dialog approach
> 
> Here's a demo of using a dialog for search options. Also shown in the demo
> is a change to make the QFS use the F attributes options settings. For
> unknown reason 'Match case' and 'Whole words only' settings from the QFS
> search options dialog are detected by the F dialog but not the Similarity
> settings.

Thanks Jim. It is looking promising.

Have we decided then that the Find results deck is going to be common to the
QFS *AND* the F dialog?  The Results panel is shaping up nicely to handle
both, question is if the F settings should impact the FindBar/QFS--or not.

Seems a cleaner break can be made if not, with the FindBar/QFS offering limited
options and the F dialog standing alone (even if its results end up delivered
via the Find deck).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160345] Slow rendering of filled polygon

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160345

--- Comment #2 from Dave Gilbert  ---
Adding some debug, I'm seeing a useful amount of time in
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl iterating over the space using the tiny 2x2
(or 1x1) tiles; I think calling the devices DrawBitmapEx for each one.

I see with some debug added:
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1711246
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1763805
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1846516
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 1 x 1
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: 0 nBLeft: 0
nBHeight: 1 nBWidth: 1 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 1 nOHeight:213 nOWidth:254
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1586536
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1890982
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 1 x 1
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: 0 nBLeft: 0
nBHeight: 1 nBWidth: 1 nOTop:1 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:20 nOWidth:24
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 2241
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1804904
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1880210
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1827428
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1822608
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1811949
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1805552
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl PreScaled=1 size: 2 x 2
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl nOffsetX: 0 nOffsetY: 0 nBTop: -1 nBLeft: -1
nBHeight: 2 nBWidth: 2 nOTop:0 nOLeft: 0 nOHeight:452 nOWidth:539
RenderFillGraphicPrimitive2DImpl bottom true exit 1776656

here the number after 'exit' is GetMonotonicTicks() difference from entry, so I
think that's about ~1.8s each time!

I also see 135510 calls to BaseProcessor2D::process (const BasePrimitive2D&)
which is a heck of a lot!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161645] Font Colour not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161645

ady  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

--- Comment #21 from ady  ---
(In reply to marcu...@gmail.com from comment #20)
> Problem: one does not know whether that feature is on or off since there is
> an icon in the place where a check mark should be!

When the setting is ON, the icon that is shown in the same menu entry has a
different background.

> Now we're talking. That did correct the issue.

@Mark,

First, I’m glad that helped.

Please understand that most of the comments you see in this Bugzilla tracker
are made by volunteers, common users. This site is not for users' support, but
to report bugs or enhancement requests.

The next time you believe that something is not working as expected, instead of
immediately opening a new bug report please go to 
and open a new topic with your doubts or problem. If other users in the Ask
forum can confirm that there is indeed a bug to report, _then_ you might want
to open a new bug report with clear steps to reproduce it and what exactly is
that you would expect to happen instead. You might also want to add a link to
the specific topic in the Ask forum; which usually helps too.

Opening tickets that don't turn out to be real bug reports is a lot of
resources being wasted, for all of us. Please keep in mind, again, that I am
just a common user like you, and most of us here are.

This is not the first time I suggest, to you specifically, going to the Ask
forum. The complaints and rants that I have read in some of your prior comments
don't help either. Next time I see a report from you, I will probably think
twice before using my time on it.

According to your comment 20, I am now closing this report as not-a-bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161739] Export as PDF..blows up file size by factor 20

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161739

m_a_riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #3 from m_a_riosv  ---
Please attach a sample file, reduce the size as much as possible without
private information, and paste the information in Menu/Help/About LibreOffice,
there is a copy icon.

Please attach also a screenshot of the 'General' tab on export window.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161645] Font Colour not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161645

--- Comment #20 from marcu...@gmail.com  ---
Now we're talking. That did correct the issue.

Problem: one does not know whether that feature is on or off since there is an
icon in the place where a check mark should be!

There are other features likewise depicted 

Shouldn't something be done to facilitate knowing visually what's on and what
isn't?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160543] Quickfind sidebar: Search depends on F settings

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160543

--- Comment #9 from Jim Raykowski  ---
Created attachment 194913
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194913=edit
Demo of search options dialog approach

Here's a demo of using a dialog for search options. Also shown in the demo is a
change to make the QFS use the F attributes options settings. For unknown
reason 'Match case' and 'Whole words only' settings from the QFS search options
dialog are detected by the F dialog but not the Similarity settings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161745] Impress program icon is incorrectly shown in Panel and ALT+TAB with Linux Mint

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161745

Óvári  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Impress program icon is |Impress program icon is
   |incorrectly replaced with a |incorrectly shown in Panel
   |System icon in Panel in |and ALT+TAB with Linux Mint
   |Linux Mint  |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161745] Impress program icon is incorrectly replaced with a System icon in Panel in Linux Mint

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161745

--- Comment #3 from Óvári  ---
LibreOffice 24.2: Flatpak from
https://flathub.org/apps/org.libreoffice.LibreOffice

LibreOffice 24.8: DEB from
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download-libreoffice/?type=deb-x86_64=24.8.0=en-GB

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161745] Impress program icon is incorrectly replaced with a System icon in Panel in Linux Mint

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161745

--- Comment #2 from Óvári  ---
Created attachment 194912
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194912=edit
LibreOffice Impress 24.2 and 24.8 ALT+TAB

LibreOffice 24.2 icons in ALT+TAB showing correctly.
LibreOffice 24.8 icon in ALT+TAB showing incorrectly.

Thank you

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 120206] When switching keyboard layout, scrolling should not behave as though Scroll Lock was toggled

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120206

--- Comment #16 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
Somehow, I can no longer reproduce the bug with:

Version: 24.8.0.0.beta1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 318462181c709ed29c01eb3239b4d600d7b82ecc
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.6; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-IL (en_IL); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

not sure why.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159499] Wrong "You can only use a language whose dictionary is installed" claim in Writer Guide

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159499

Jean Weber  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |jeanwe...@gmail.com
   |desktop.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #1 from Jean Weber  ---
Corrected in file for LO Writer Guide 24.8.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161745] Impress program icon is incorrectly replaced with a System icon in Panel in Linux Mint

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161745

--- Comment #1 from Óvári  ---
Created attachment 194911
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194911=edit
LibreOffice 24.8.0.0.beta1 incorrect Impress icon in Panel in Linux Mint 21.3
Cinnamon

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161745] New: Impress program icon is incorrectly replaced with a System icon in Panel in Linux Mint

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161745

Bug ID: 161745
   Summary: Impress program icon is incorrectly replaced with a
System icon in Panel in Linux Mint
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 24.8.0.0 beta1+
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Impress
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: ovari...@zoho.com

Description:
Impress program icon is incorrectly replaced with a System icon in Panel in
Linux Mint

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open LibreOffice 24.8 beta 1

Actual Results:
Impress program icon is incorrectly replaced with a System icon in Panel in
Linux Mint

Expected Results:
Impress program icon is correctly shown in Panel in Linux Mint


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Impress icon shows correctly with LibreOffice 24.2.4.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161740] Expanded selected cell rectangle hides content in surrounding cells

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161740

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 161709 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6), it also can block content in other cells

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

--- Comment #31 from V Stuart Foote  ---
*** Bug 161740 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 109139] [META] Cell selection bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Bug 109139 depends on bug 161740, which changed state.

Bug 161740 Summary: Expanded selected cell rectangle hides content in 
surrounding cells
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161740

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6), it also can block content in other cells

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Cell selecting fat border   |Cell selecting fat border
   |looks ugly especially if|looks ugly especially if
   |you selected some cell  |you selected some cell
   |range (comment 6)   |range (comment 6), it also
   ||can block content in other
   ||cells

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161432] LibreOffice 7.6.7.2 is repeatedly prompting to upgrade to v24.2.3 on MacOS 13.6.7 (on Intel)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161432

Ken Selig  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |---
 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

--- Comment #2 from Ken Selig  ---
If the stable channel is now deprecated / EoL then that should be reflected on
the downloads page - https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download-libreoffice/

Currently, there is no indication of this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
   |desktop.org |ice.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 141773] Autocorrection for all languages doesn't work anymore

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141773

--- Comment #25 from Jordi  ---
Just switched over to Ubuntu and got hit by this nasty bug. 

Version: 7.6.7.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: dd47e4b30cb7dab30588d6c79c651f218165e3c5
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded


Show stopper for me. Back to Windows. :(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 109139] [META] Cell selection bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Bug 109139 depends on bug 161740, which changed state.

Bug 161740 Summary: Expanded selected cell rectangle hides content in 
surrounding cells
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161740

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |---

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161740] Expanded selected cell rectangle hides content in surrounding cells

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161740

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |---

--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #5)
> Of course it is, as your comments in the existing discussion on bug 161709
> confirm.

So, you're saying that because I obliged Rafael to conduct the discussion on
one bug, this bug should be marked duplicate? Great way to incentivize courtesy
on BZ.

> And frankly it would be nice if you would take the time to review BZ for
> issues (open or resolved) before spamming us all and opening new
> orphaned/nuisance bugs for issues already under review.

I actually do that, but BZ search is rather weak so sometimes it misses. And
it's easier for me to miss when it's not a part of the bug tree which I'm
familiar with. I will try and remember to enable the search for resolved bugs
rather than sticking to unresolved ones.

> That leaves less mess in BZ for QA review to have to clean up. And when QA
> does edit, how about graciously accepting when you've been called out on
> redundant submission and accepting the decision.

"Grace" means not making arbitrary decisions after a previous discussion went a
different way. LO QA is a collaborative effort, not something embodied in your
person. Argue your case like anybody else.

If you were to suggest you wanted to roll up the two bugs into one, change the
title of 161709 accordingly, then mark this one as a dupe - I would have no
problem with that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 113340] [META] RTF (text) paragraph-related issues

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113340

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161636


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161636
[Bug 161636] FILEOPEN: RTF: Document is displayed in 2 pages instead of 10
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161636] FILEOPEN: RTF: Document is displayed in 2 pages instead of 10

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161636

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||113340
 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113340
[Bug 113340] [META] RTF (text) paragraph-related issues
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 109139] [META] Cell selection bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Bug 109139 depends on bug 161740, which changed state.

Bug 161740 Summary: Expanded selected cell rectangle hides content in 
surrounding cells
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161740

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 |
   |1740|

--- Comment #30 from V Stuart Foote  ---
*** Bug 161740 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161740] Expanded selected cell rectangle hides content in surrounding cells

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161740

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 |
   |1709|
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Of course it is, as your comments in the existing discussion on bug 161709
confirm . While the see also list of comment 3 are germane to how the current
state of the cell selection outline has evolved.

And frankly it would be nice if you would take the time to review BZ for issues
(open or resolved) before spamming us all and opening new orphaned/nuisance
bugs for issues already under review.

That leaves less mess in BZ for QA review to have to clean up. And when QA does
edit, how about graciously accepting when you've been called out on redundant
submission and accepting the decision.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 161709 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

--- Comment #5 from Buovjaga  ---
(In reply to ady from comment #4)
> (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> > returned to keyboard focus on the current
> > cell. ... but that doesn't happen; Esc seems to do nothing while the focus
> > remains within the function sidebar deck.
> 
> I must be missing something here.
> 
> If I display the Sidebar Deck, for example with the "Properties" of the
> active cell, I can change some property (e.g. font size), and the focus will
> still be on the active cell; for example if I immediately press the
> Down_arrow key, the focus changes from the adjacent cell down one row.
> 
> The Sidebar Deck behaves not so much as a dialog window (for which indeed
> [ESC] exists the dialog without saving, i.e. "cancel"), but rather as a UI
> toolbar. This is expected, AFAIK.
> 
> Perhaps we need specific STR in order to reproduce the problem?

This only affects the Functions deck - after Esc takes you to the Search field,
it does not move you to the document.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161645] Font Colour not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161645

--- Comment #19 from ady  ---
Before I post additional instructions, please beware not to execute more than
one LO version at a time. You should rather close LO (24.2.4.2) before starting
LO Dev (25.2 alpha), or vice versa. It is fine to have both installed, but you
should avoid having both opened/running simultaneously.

(In reply to marcu...@gmail.com from comment #18)
> I followed those steps in a new calc sheet in LO v. 24.2.4.2. 
> Font remains unchanged.

In LO 24.2.4.2, please go to menu View > Value highlighting. Is this ON, or
OFF? Please try changing this setting once, try changing the font color of cell
A1 again, and then change the same “Value highlighting“ setting once again.

Is there any effect on the displayed font color on cell A1 then?

According to your next comment, I might provide further instructions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 86872] Word completion: Add ability to save word completion (aka "auto complete") lists and re-use them

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86872

--- Comment #16 from mateusz.pietrzyk  ---
The problem doesn't seem to have been resolved yet. It would be great if
Auto-complete list could collect words from multiple documents and remember
them.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

--- Comment #29 from ady  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #27)
> Created attachment 194910 [details]

May I ask, what's the difference between attachment 194910 and attachment
194909?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

--- Comment #4 from ady  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> returned to keyboard focus on the current
> cell. ... but that doesn't happen; Esc seems to do nothing while the focus
> remains within the function sidebar deck.

I must be missing something here.

If I display the Sidebar Deck, for example with the "Properties" of the active
cell, I can change some property (e.g. font size), and the focus will still be
on the active cell; for example if I immediately press the Down_arrow key, the
focus changes from the adjacent cell down one row.

The Sidebar Deck behaves not so much as a dialog window (for which indeed [ESC]
exists the dialog without saving, i.e. "cancel"), but rather as a UI toolbar.
This is expected, AFAIK.

Perhaps we need specific STR in order to reproduce the problem?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161744] New: Implement Cyrillic Mongolian numbering for headings

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161744

Bug ID: 161744
   Summary: Implement Cyrillic Mongolian numbering for headings
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.6.7.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: mongolie2006-freedesk...@yahoo.fr

Several Cyrillic alphabets are available for numbering headers in
Tools→"Heading numbering"→Numbering→"Number:", but Cyrillic Mongolian is not
there. The Mongolian Cyrillic alphabet is there:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_Cyrillic_alphabet#Description . It's
the official alphabet of (outer) Mongolia. I guess it would not be difficult to
add it.

An alternative would be to allow the user to define an alphabet he/she wants to
use for such a purpose.

(See also bug#115189 for the Mongol-Uyghur alphabet)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |
   |.freedesktop.org|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Buovjaga  ---
Oh, it's actually true that hitting Esc in Sidebar enough times should send
focus back to document and it works like that in other decks:
https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2017/02/16/guidelines-for-keyboard-navigation-in-the-sidebar/

"Use Escape to go back one step in the navigation, meaning from the content to
the content panel title and then to the document."

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161645] Font Colour not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161645

--- Comment #18 from marcu...@gmail.com  ---
I followed those steps in a new calc sheet in LO v. 24.2.4.2. 
Font remains unchanged.
I can change fill in colour of the cell but NOT the font colour.

If I use LO Dev 25.2, then there is no issue.

Mark

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161645] Font Colour not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161645

--- Comment #17 from ady  ---
@Mark,

For anyone to be able to solve a problem, the problem has to be replicated. I
am a common user, just as you. I have tested the behavior you reported with LO
Calc on Windows, and I do not reproduce it.

I would like to kindly ask you to follow a few simple steps, in order to move
this report forward:

1. Save and close other documents and programs that are not related to this
test.
2. Start a new empty Calc spreadsheet.
3. In cell A1, type-in "Text" (without quotation marks).
4. Press the [ENTER] key on your keyboard.

4.1. At this point, the most common behavior is that the active cell is by now
cell A2, while the typed-in text is shown on cell A1.

5. Using the arrow keys of your keyboard, move the focus back to the prior cell
A1. If the conditions in the prior step ("4.1") were met in your case, then
pressing the "UP" arrow key in your keyboard should set cell A1 as the active
cell.

6. With cell A1 being the active cell, click on the icon that changes the font
color. The icon is a split button: clicking on the right-side down arrow that
is part of the icon would allow you to select a different color than the
current default ("Dark Red 2").


After following these steps, the font color of the content of cell A1 should be
changed according to the color you selected (in the above step 6). According to
your next comment, I might add some more steps for you to follow, in order to
find out what the problem could be (so it could be solved).

Do you see the Text within cell A1 being displayed with the selected font color
then?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #194910|5 Screenshots exemplifying  |How LO 24.8 focus rectangle
description|how LO 24.8 rectangle hides |hides adjacent cell
   |adjacent cell contents; |contents at 100% (MSO, LO
   |MSO, LO 24.2, LO 24.8   |24.2, LO 24.8)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

--- Comment #28 from Mihai Vasiliu  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #27)
> Created attachment 194910 [details]
> 5 Screenshots exemplifying how LO 24.8 rectangle hides adjacent cell
> contents; MSO, LO 24.2, LO 24.8
> 
> Adding a comparative grid of screenshots and related comments from the
> related bug 161740:
> 
> While the aesthetics of this focus rectangle are annoying, the more
> significant problem IMHO. Is cell content being hidden. If a wide rectangle
> is drawn on the inside, it will hide the cell's own contents; and if a wide
> rectangle is drawn on the outside (especially with the extra pixel(s) of
> clearance from the active cell edge) - it will hide other cells' contents,
> and possibly more than just one. That is really detrimental and frustrating,
> requiring artificial movement just to figure out what the cell actually
> contains.
> 
> I believe that the width must be _limited_, and moreover, must be split
> between the inside and the outside of the cell, so that none of their
> contents is drawn over by the focus rectangle, nor touched at the adjacent
> pixel. That is to say - Excel gets it right. :-(

Excellent collage of screenshots! I really agree that the way Excel displays
the selection is the best. We should follow the same strategy in my opinion.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 61174] [META] Recent Documents List

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61174

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161650


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161650
[Bug 161650] odg document opened from recent list in Impress is opened in
Impress instead of Draw
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161650] odg document opened from recent list in Impress is opened in Impress instead of Draw

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161650

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||61174
 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
[Bug 61174] [META] Recent Documents List
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 71732] [META] Bugs related to text rendering, typography and font features in LO

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71732

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||153367


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153367
[Bug 153367] Allow numbered font weight
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 153367] Allow numbered font weight

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153367

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||71732
 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71732
[Bug 71732] [META] Bugs related to text rendering, typography and font features
in LO
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103441] [META] Functions deck/tab of the sidebar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103441
Bug 103441 depends on bug 161743, which changed state.

Bug 161743 Summary: Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck 
to cell with Esc key
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|WONTFIX |---

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|WONTFIX |---
 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #1)
> The short cut is Ctrl+F6. 

I don't want to have to know about a special shortcut. Esc should work. It
works in a lot of other contexts, and should work here as well. I don't mind if
Ctrl+F6 does the same thing too...

> It belongs to the accessibility short cuts.

I expect to be able to back out of entering the functions sidebar deck
regardless of accessibility considerations.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 104449] [META] DOCX (OOXML) textbox-related issues

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104449

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161732


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161732
[Bug 161732] When i save a odt file to docx file, the color of the textbox
changes from green to red
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161732] When i save a odt file to docx file, the color of the textbox changes from green to red

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161732

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g
 Blocks||104449


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104449
[Bug 104449] [META] DOCX (OOXML) textbox-related issues
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161724] FILEOPEN PPTX: image completely disappears, other quite off (zoomed in?)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161724

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||139902
 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139902
[Bug 139902] [META] PPTX Image issues
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 139902] [META] PPTX Image issues

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139902

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161724


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161724
[Bug 161724] FILEOPEN PPTX: image completely disappears, other quite off
(zoomed in?)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

--- Comment #27 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
Created attachment 194910
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194910=edit
5 Screenshots exemplifying how LO 24.8 rectangle hides adjacent cell contents;
MSO, LO 24.2, LO 24.8

Adding a comparative grid of screenshots and related comments from the related
bug 161740:

While the aesthetics of this focus rectangle are annoying, the more significant
problem IMHO. Is cell content being hidden. If a wide rectangle is drawn on the
inside, it will hide the cell's own contents; and if a wide rectangle is drawn
on the outside (especially with the extra pixel(s) of clearance from the active
cell edge) - it will hide other cells' contents, and possibly more than just
one. That is really detrimental and frustrating, requiring artificial movement
just to figure out what the cell actually contains.

I believe that the width must be _limited_, and moreover, must be split between
the inside and the outside of the cell, so that none of their contents is drawn
over by the focus rectangle, nor touched at the adjacent pixel. That is to say
- Excel gets it right. :-(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161705


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161705
[Bug 161705] LO crashes with undo/redo of page numbering wizard's created
bookmarks
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161645] Font Colour not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161645

--- Comment #16 from marcu...@gmail.com  ---
Change font colour works on Dev 25.2.

I didn't do any changes to the AppData files.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 108746] [META] Page number field bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108746

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161705


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161705
[Bug 161705] LO crashes with undo/redo of page numbering wizard's created
bookmarks
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161705] LO crashes with undo/redo of page numbering wizard's created bookmarks

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161705

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g
 Blocks||108746, 133092


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108746
[Bug 108746] [META] Page number field bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092
[Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161741


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161741
[Bug 161741] LO crashes with undo/redo of new header + some other change
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 105948] [META] Undo/Redo bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105948

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161741


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161741
[Bug 161741] LO crashes with undo/redo of new header + some other change
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 48741] [META] Writer's page header and footer issues

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48741

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161741


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161741
[Bug 161741] LO crashes with undo/redo of new header + some other change
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161741] LO crashes with undo/redo of new header + some other change

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161741

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g
 Blocks||133092, 105948, 48741


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48741
[Bug 48741] [META] Writer's page header and footer issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105948
[Bug 105948] [META] Undo/Redo bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092
[Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161493


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161493
[Bug 161493] Crash Creating a simple pivot table with 2x2 data fails
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161493] Crash Creating a simple pivot table with 2x2 data fails

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161493

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||133092


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092
[Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161493] Crash Creating a simple pivot table with 2x2 data fails

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161493

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||103381
 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103381
[Bug 103381] [META] Pivot table (aka Data Pilot) bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103381] [META] Pivot table (aka Data Pilot) bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103381

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161493


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161493
[Bug 161493] Crash Creating a simple pivot table with 2x2 data fails
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103441] [META] Functions deck/tab of the sidebar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103441
Bug 103441 depends on bug 161743, which changed state.

Bug 161743 Summary: Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck 
to cell with Esc key
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
   ||ice.org
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
   ||1740

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 109139] [META] Cell selection bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Bug 109139 depends on bug 161740, which changed state.

Bug 161740 Summary: Expanded selected cell rectangle hides content in 
surrounding cells
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161740

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |---

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161740] Expanded selected cell rectangle hides content in surrounding cells

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161740

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
   ||1709
   Keywords||needsUXEval
 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |---

--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #3)
> also see 
> bug 143733
> bug 161204
> bug 161234

Those are all fixed bugs.

Anyway, this is not a dupe.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161493] Crash Creating a simple pivot table with 2x2 data fails

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161493

--- Comment #12 from ady  ---
If you would like to test whether a Dev version (which includes recent patches
solving other crashes) would solve this problem too, please carefully read and
follow the instructions posted at tdf#161461 comment 14 (do not forget to use
the "xattr" command mentioned there).

Please report the result of your test in tdf#161493.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161742] When creating a new spreadsheet while in the Functions sidebar deck, focus stays in deck

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161742

ady  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|FIXED   |WORKSFORME

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de

--- Comment #1 from Regina Henschel  ---
The short cut is Ctrl+F6. It belongs to the accessibility short cuts.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161741] LO crashes with undo/redo of new header + some other change

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161741

Bogaboga Man  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Bogaboga Man  ---
I can confirm this bug.

Problem is that the crash report indicated to be at
https://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/8a4c3af4-eaf7-43e3-840f-86e475f355b8
is not available! I am using this environment: - 

Version: 24.2.4.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 51a6219feb6075d9a4c46691dcfe0cd9c4fff3c2
CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22631; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: en-CA (en_CA); UI: en-GB
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103441] [META] Functions deck/tab of the sidebar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103441

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161743


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743
[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell
with Esc key
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||103441


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103441
[Bug 103441] [META] Functions deck/tab of the sidebar
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161743] New: Should be able to return focus from function sidebar deck to cell with Esc key

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161743

Bug ID: 161743
   Summary: Should be able to return focus from function sidebar
deck to cell with Esc key
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 24.8.0.0 alpha0+
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: minor
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: eyalr...@gmx.com

While the function sidebar deck is not a dialog, it is dialog-like enough, so
that I expect, when pressing Esc while in it, that I returned to the state of
it not being there, i.e. returned to keyboard focus on the current cell. ...
but that doesn't happen; Esc seems to do nothing while the focus remains within
the function sidebar deck.

Bikeshedding: Esc could move from one widget within the rectangle to another,
and then out with another Esc - or directly out of the sidebar deck right away.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103441] [META] Functions deck/tab of the sidebar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103441
Bug 103441 depends on bug 161742, which changed state.

Bug 161742 Summary: When creating a new spreadsheet while in the Functions 
sidebar deck, focus stays in deck
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161742

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161742] When creating a new spreadsheet while in the Functions sidebar deck, focus stays in deck

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161742

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
Never mind, fixed in LO 24.8 beta.

Version: 24.8.0.0.beta1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 318462181c709ed29c01eb3239b4d600d7b82ecc
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.6; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: hu-HU (en_IL); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161742] When creating a new spreadsheet while in the Functions sidebar deck, focus stays in deck

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161742

--- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
Actually, it's even _worse_! If I'm in _another_ sidebar deck, and create a new
document, the focus switches to the functions deck :-(

Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.6; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-IL (en_IL); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

but let me also try another nightly or the beta.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161742] When creating a new spreadsheet while in the Functions sidebar deck, focus stays in deck

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161742

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||103441


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103441
[Bug 103441] [META] Functions deck/tab of the sidebar
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103441] [META] Functions deck/tab of the sidebar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103441

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||161742


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161742
[Bug 161742] When creating a new spreadsheet while in the Functions sidebar
deck, focus stays in deck
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161742] New: When creating a new spreadsheet while in the Functions sidebar deck, focus stays in deck

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161742

Bug ID: 161742
   Summary: When creating a new spreadsheet while in the Functions
sidebar deck, focus stays in deck
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 24.8.0.0 alpha0+
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: eyalr...@gmx.com

Reproduction:

1. Create a new Calc document.
2. Expand the sidebar.
3. Switch to the functions sidebar deck.
4. Create a new document, either with File > New > Spreadsheet or with Ctrl+N
5. type some text

Expected result:
Text is typed in cell A1 of the new document

Actual result:
Text is typed in the search textbox of the functions sidebar (for cell A1)

This confounds user expectations. The user absolutely does not want to be
placed in the function sidebar deck, for an empty cell in an empty document
which they have just created.

The keyboard focus, after new document creation, should be on a sheet cell.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 161709] Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected some cell range (comment 6)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Cell selecting fat border   |Cell selecting fat border
   |looks ugly especially if|looks ugly especially if
   |you selected some cell  |you selected some cell
   |range   |range (comment 6)
 CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.