[Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||160789 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160789 [Bug 160789] [META] Regressions from "new ODF numbered list parameter loext:num-list-format" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.2.7.2 release |7.2.0.1 rc URL||https://ask.libreoffice.org ||/t/unwanted-change-to-cross ||-referencing-numbering-conv ||ention/87797 --- Comment #10 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #6) > That was introduced by https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/117156, which > mentions: "changed cross-references values to lists: they are now including > full list label string" Just explicitly quoting the commit: aa5c6d127559912ad60a63fbd972b78fb8f9691b (and its 7.2 cherrypick 9987b518fca1476bd0ce8c86bcf6ac7c81f7b580). (In reply to Andrew Conley from comment #9) > But I add that, given that this worked a particular way for a long time, it > seems to me that the default should be set to how it used to work. I.e., if > I open a document from one year ago, I should not have to go through it and > replace all of the cross-references. @Vasily, any comment about this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Conley --- Yes, I think that something like the suggestions in bug 149635 would work. But I add that, given that this worked a particular way for a long time, it seems to me that the default should be set to how it used to work. I.e., if I open a document from one year ago, I should not have to go through it and replace all of the cross-references. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7) > Duplicate of bug 149635? I'd say so. Andrew, would you agree such feature would fix your problem? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 149635 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 --- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze --- Duplicate of bug 149635? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org OS|Linux (All) |All Version|7.3.7.2 release |7.2.7.2 release --- Comment #6 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Back in 7.1, the dot was not included: Version: 7.1.0.3 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: f6099ecf3d29644b5008cc8f48f42f4a40986e4c CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded But back then, the behaviour was very inconsistent: - only "before" character: kept - only "after" character: stripped - both "before" and "after" characters: both kept Since 7.2, all "before" and "after" characters are kept: Version: 7.2.7.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 8d71d29d553c0f7dcbfa38fbfda25ee34cce99a2 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded That was introduced by https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/117156, which mentions: "changed cross-references values to lists: they are now including full list label string" However, the fix for bug 144563 restores the stripping of the final dot since 7.3.3 and 7.4.0 for MS Word compatibility reasons, but only when the full reference ends with it. E.g. "1." becomes "1", but "1.(a)" stays the same (as you've noticed already). In my opinion, keeping all characters is more consistent. Why should the dot be stripped but not the parentheses? But I can understand the appeal of having the option to strip them or not, which could be done as described in bug 149635#c11 Also adding Heiko to CC, as he participated in related discussions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||9635, ||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||4563, ||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||7774 CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de, ||vasily.melenc...@cib.de Blocks||107905 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| --- Comment #5 from Dieter --- Vasily, you've worked on bug 144563, so I assume, you can assess, if current behaviour is a bug or not cc: Vasily Melenchuk Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107905 [Bug 107905] [META] Cross-references bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Conley --- Comment on attachment 185419 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=185419 Example Windows I tried it on 7.4.5.1 in a Windows VirtualBox installation. Same problem. See second attachment: ‘Example Windows’. Version: 7.4.5.1 (x86) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 9c0871452b3918c1019dde9bfac75448afc4b57f CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-GB Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Conley --- Created attachment 185419 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=185419=edit Example Windows -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Conley --- I tried it on 7.4.5.1 in a Windows VirtualBox installation. Same problem. See second attachment: ‘Example Windows’. Version: 7.4.5.1 (x86) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 9c0871452b3918c1019dde9bfac75448afc4b57f CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-GB Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153680] Period [.] incorrectly formatting in cross-reference to outline numbering paragraph
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153680 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Conley --- Created attachment 185418 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=185418=edit Example -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
