[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100498] HTML EXPORT: Please integrate impress.js / bespoke.js in html Export or at least add key navigation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100498 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Grotz --- Sorry for al the typos and grammar mistakes, I was in a hurry when I wrote it and I am not a native English speaker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100498] HTML EXPORT: Please integrate impress.js / bespoke.js in html Export or at least add key navigation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100498 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||todven...@suomi24.fi --- Comment #2 from Buovjaga --- I think the use of such 3rd party JavaScript frameworks would better fit an extension rather than LibO core. Just do a web search with "javascript framework fatigue" and you will get what I mean.. Design team, what do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100498] HTML EXPORT: Please integrate impress.js / bespoke.js in html Export or at least add key navigation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100498 --- Comment #3 from Tomaz Vajngerl --- Well the export to HTML as it is now is useless. You have the option of "Standard HTML", "Standard HTML with frames", "Single-document HTML", "Automatic", "WebCast". All of them except Single-document HTML will create images of slides with limited resolutions available (max 1024x768 is rather low even when we say it is "High", not to even mention it assumes 4:3 screen ratio). I think all this is rather useless today as we could make a much better job with exporting SVGs and/or use other HTML5 features. "Standard HTML" is a basic with text for navigation.. "Standard HTML with frames" is something I would just remove.. frames aren't used today anymore for practically anything. The interface is however a more advanced and you can even choose some icons for navigation, but yeah quite lame for todays standard. "Single-document HTML" will try to (at least) export all text and use some HTML features, but is incomplete. "Automatic" just advances slides automatically, otherwise same as "Standard HTML" I think. "WebCast" creates in addition some perl or asp scripts for some sort of web casting.. I think an interesting idea but totally outdated - practically nobody can use this today anymore (or want to use it). I think we should decide first what to do with this things - what HTML export should even do, what is useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100498] HTML EXPORT: Please integrate impress.js / bespoke.js in html Export or at least add key navigation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100498 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- The de facto standard of sharing documents is PDF. You can run your presentation on any machine in full screen mode. HTML is made for interactivity, not really needed for presentations. And as Tomaz states, the implementation in LibreOffice is more or less broken. So if you really need this feature the best way to do is per extension. Setting as WONTFIX here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
