[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105542] First condition is not a good way to identify conditions in Manage Conditional Formatting (MCF)

2017-04-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105542

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
   ||7141

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105542] First condition is not a good way to identify conditions in Manage Conditional Formatting (MCF)

2017-04-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105542

--- Comment #5 from paj...@gmail.com ---
I created a mockup in #107141

Although I thought this wasnt necessary... due to being a disagreement on this
being useful and not on how it could look like

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105542] First condition is not a good way to identify conditions in Manage Conditional Formatting (MCF)

2017-04-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105542

--- Comment #4 from Buovjaga  ---
(In reply to pajaro from comment #3)
> Please, could you reconsider adding a description field to the conditions?

You could create a new report and include a proposal of how it should look.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105542] First condition is not a good way to identify conditions in Manage Conditional Formatting (MCF)

2017-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105542

--- Comment #3 from paj...@gmail.com ---
Please, could you reconsider adding a description field to the conditions?

When Having a few more conditions than normal in multiple parts is really a
mess of a dialog

This coupled with the fact that when you copy/paste cells with CF, multiple new
CF are added, subdividing new cell ranges, the dialog gets reaaally messy

This is really a hindrance for CF in general

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105542] First condition is not a good way to identify conditions in Manage Conditional Formatting (MCF)

2017-02-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105542

Markus Mohrhard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #2 from Markus Mohrhard  ---
There is not a better solution. Just use the range to identify the format. The
shown condition is just a helpful addition.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105542] First condition is not a good way to identify conditions in Manage Conditional Formatting (MCF)

2017-02-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105542

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||todven...@suomi24.fi
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Buovjaga  ---
Yeah, I noticed this when testing a ColorScale report. Let's set to NEW.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs