[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 | |1879| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||1879 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||todven...@suomi24.fi --- Comment #5 from Buovjaga --- I don't think there is much need for a preprocessor nowadays. Responding to some points in the raygun.com blog: 1. https://caniuse.com/#feat=css-variables 2. @import causing multiple requests is a non-problem in the age of HTTP/2: https://discourse.wicg.io/t/is-css-import-still-considered-as-an-anti-pattern/1967/5 3. Whole article in general, but as a comment to mixins: https://cathydutton.co.uk/posts/why-i-stopped-using-sass/ "CSS custom properties can do more than just replace pre processor variables, they have the added bonus of being updated dynamically (instead of compiled at build). This allows values to be altered at run time with Javascript and to be scoped without the need for mixins and functions to outwit the cascade." 5. https://caniuse.com/#feat=calc Postprocessing [1] might be more useful, but it is always a danger to introduce more moving parts and complicate the build process. [1] https://postcss.org/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||difficultyInteresting, ||easyHack, skillJavaScript, ||topicWeb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) --- So probably whoever does the work should decide which one to use. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 --- Comment #3 from Alexandru Vladutu --- If I'm not mistaken if you use .scss (which is more common) the same can be said for SASS. Personally I don't think there's much difference between SASS, Less or even Stylus. All have the most important features that people commonly use. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 --- Comment #2 from Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) --- (In reply to Alexandru Vladutu from comment #1) > Sass seems to be the most popular option though, and we can use > https://github.com/sass/node-sass without having to require Ruby fortunately. Ah good to know. Despite popularity, are there any important advantages SASS has over LESS? LESS has the advantage that it's backwards-compatible with CSS, so we could gradually introduce it without converting all CSS in one shot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 --- Comment #1 from Alexandru Vladutu --- Sass seems to be the most popular option though, and we can use https://github.com/sass/node-sass without having to require Ruby fortunately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125696] Introduce CSS preprocessor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696 Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
