[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127073] Redaction done right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073 --- Comment #7 from Ulrich Windl --- (In reply to Dieter Praas from comment #6) > Ulrich, I agree that redacted PDF should be searchable (actual it is not). > Is this - in short - your proposal in this bug report? My basic point was that a PDF page is much more than a pixel image, but redaction as implemented now just seems to create such. Being able to search is probably the pint most noticeable to the user, but document structure, and file size are also important issues. Finally I wonder whether you'll be able to make good-looking high-resolution prints of such redacted documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127073] Redaction done right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073 --- Comment #6 from Dieter Praas --- Ulrich, I agree that redacted PDF should be searchable (actual it is not). Is this - in short - your proposal in this bug report? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127073] Redaction done right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073 --- Comment #5 from Ulrich Windl --- Created attachment 153686 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153686=edit ZIP-Archive with test documents (ODT, PDFs) The ZIP contains: Testpage.odt: A simple text document with images used for PDF export Testpage.pdf: PDF produced from LO6.2 Testpage-Distiller.pdf: PDF produced by Adobe's Distiller Note: For some reason the Adobe tool cannot redact parts of an image for the PDF created by LO, but it can for the PDF created by Distiller. Thus the extra file. Testpage-Distiller-redacted.pdf: Parts of the text and parts of the images being redacted. Length DateTimeName - -- - 312544 2019-08-27 13:41 Testpage-Distiller-redacted.pdf 89760 2019-08-27 13:33 Testpage-Distiller.pdf 17055 2019-08-27 13:18 Testpage.odt 135472 2019-08-27 13:19 Testpage.pdf - --- Try the redacted PDF, searching for text: You can find any text that had not been redacted, while you cannot find text that had been redacted. I think THAT's the way to go. Note: I just realized that the original ODT had images linked; thus they are missing in the ZIP. However, any image will do... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127073] Redaction done right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073 --- Comment #4 from Ulrich Windl --- (In reply to Muhammet Kara from comment #2) > What the reporter describes might be a nice (but risky -check the internet > for security incidents of similar implementations-) implementation of a > redaction feature, but not this one. Unless there is a strong will, and > necessary resources to implement another version of the redaction feature, > this is a WONTFIX for me. Well I think another "poor man's solution" was selected for this interesting feature. I can make an offer: Provide a simple test document, where the parts to be redacted are marked in some color, and I'll return you a version "redacted" with Adobe's product. Then you can look what you find in the document, and compare it to the "pixel version". If you don't know better, you might think things have to be that way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127073] Redaction done right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073 Ulrich Windl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensb ||urg.de --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Windl --- (In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #1) > But then any enemy (or journalists) will delete your shapes using good PDF > Editor and will see your secret info. Export to bitmap PDF will guarantee us > that our secret info will remain secret. You missed what I wrote: I did not write "overlayed by" but "replaced with". Of course implementation will be harder. So if anenemy will delete the rectangles, there will be just "holes" in the document where the rectangles were. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127073] Redaction done right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073 --- Comment #2 from Muhammet Kara --- (In reply to Ulrich Windl from comment #0) > (the current implementation is basically the digital version of "print it, > blacken it, scan it again to make a new document"). That's exactly how it was designed. (In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #1) > I think it's WONTFIX > > Muhammet, what do you think? What the reporter describes might be a nice (but risky -check the internet for security incidents of similar implementations-) implementation of a redaction feature, but not this one. Unless there is a strong will, and necessary resources to implement another version of the redaction feature, this is a WONTFIX for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127073] Redaction done right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||79045_79...@mail.ru, ||muhammet.k...@collabora.com --- Comment #1 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> --- But then any enemy (or journalists) will delete your shapes using good PDF Editor and will see your secret info. Export to bitmap PDF will guarantee us that our secret info will remain secret. I think it's WONTFIX Muhammet, what do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127073] Redaction done right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127073 Dieter Praas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||125825 CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125825 [Bug 125825] [META] (Auto-)Redaction bugs and improvement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
