[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144915] "The dictionary is already full" when adding new word to dictionary
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com |desktop.org | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144915] "The dictionary is already full" when adding new word to dictionary
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915 --- Comment #6 from Commit Notification --- Caolán McNamara committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/bd0b3aac25b5163ae21fff613131cb3ff068e816 tdf#144915 effectively remove limit on number of words in dictionary It will be available in 7.6.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144915] "The dictionary is already full" when adding new word to dictionary
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:7.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144915] "The dictionary is already full" when adding new word to dictionary
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915 --- Comment #5 from Shantanu --- A workaround is to create a new custom dictionary that will allow another set of 30,000 words! I think there is no need of such restriction. I can reproduce using Marathi(IN) Dictionary. Version: 7.4.3.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 1048a8393ae2eeec98dff31b5c133c5f1d08b890 CPU threads: 1; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 14393; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144915] "The dictionary is already full" when adding new word to dictionary
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||caol...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Caolán McNamara --- If the issue is the 30,000 limit we could just remove the limit. Its unclear why there is a limit there. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145916 would do that, and presumably let us find out why there is a limit :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144915] "The dictionary is already full" when adding new word to dictionary
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Blocks||108728 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||2110 Summary|problem with vocabulary |"The dictionary is already |replenishment |full" when adding new word ||to dictionary --- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I assume the string is "The dictionary is already full" in English. It is defined here: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/editeng/editrids.hrc?r=f7f0f399#308 And it is only used here: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/editeng/source/misc/unolingu.cxx?r=91fef4a4#738 This is triggered if the dictionary has 30,000 or more entries. Size is checked in DictionaryNeo::isFull() here: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/linguistic/source/dicimp.cxx?r=3d236177#920 DIC_MAX_ENTRIES limit of 30,000 is defined here: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/linguistic/source/dicimp.hxx?r=fd3888c6&fi=DIC_MAX_ENTRIES#33 Not sure why this hard limit. I don't see it documented: https://help.libreoffice.org/7.4/en-US/text/shared/optionen/01010400.html Any reason for this hard 30,000 limit? Should this report be changed into a documentation issue? Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108728 [Bug 108728] [META] Dictionaries bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
