[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155315] Auto-correction should not apply when multiple correct forms are possible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155315 --- Comment #4 from cipricus --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #3) > Thank you for the report. > So isn't the solution to remove the entries that are ambiguous from the > corresponding DocumentList.xml, so the erroneous form then falls back onto > the spellcheck? I assume autocorrect relies exclusively on unambiguous > 1-to-1 rules, and a DocumentList.xml can't contain several replacements for > the same string. > > Maybe this report needs to be renamed to "Remove ambiguous Romanian > autocorrect entries" so it is more focused and has a chance to be resolved. > Are you planning to work on it? Yes, I would like to work on it, although I don't know how systematically I can do it, but I would like to be able to propose changes when I notice the need at https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/151770 Is that ok? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155315] Auto-correction should not apply when multiple correct forms are possible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155315 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|Writer |Linguistic CC||so...@libreoffice.org, ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org --- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Thank you for the report. So isn't the solution to remove the entries that are ambiguous from the corresponding DocumentList.xml, so the erroneous form then falls back onto the spellcheck? I assume autocorrect relies exclusively on unambiguous 1-to-1 rules, and a DocumentList.xml can't contain several replacements for the same string. Maybe this report needs to be renamed to "Remove ambiguous Romanian autocorrect entries" so it is more focused and has a chance to be resolved. Are you planning to work on it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155315] Auto-correction should not apply when multiple correct forms are possible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155315 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155315] Auto-correction should not apply when multiple correct forms are possible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155315 --- Comment #2 from cipricus --- e.g. "tacuta" means nothing and should be corrected, but "tăcută"="silent", fem. and "tăcuta"="the silent one" are both correct) For English that would be something like auto-correcting "bleack" to "black" or "bleak", where either (the other one) may be expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155315] Auto-correction should not apply when multiple correct forms are possible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155315 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103341 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103341 [Bug 103341] [META] AutoCorrect and Word Completion bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155315] Auto-correction should not apply when multiple correct forms are possible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155315 --- Comment #1 from cipricus --- (In reply to cipricus from comment #0) > ...but which are not the only ones possible (notably, the definite forms > may also be expected in these examples: "răzbunată"=the revenged one, fem., > "răsfățată"=the spoiled/pampered one, fem., "neastâmpărată"= the > naughty/unruly, fem.). I made a copy/paste error. The above should read: the definite forms may also be expected (are also correct): "răzbunata"=the revenged one, fem.,"răsfățata"=the spoiled/pampered one, fem., "neastâmpărat"= the naughty/unruly, fem. That is, the definite form (ending in `a`) could be expected too, instead of the definite one (ending in `ă`). This structure may trigger this problem with Romanian, but it's not the only possible pattern, while other languages may have their own favorable patterns leading to the same problem. I haven't studied other language auto-correctors and am mentioning Romanian because it's here that I could intervene. The main aspect here is whether a rule like the one aforementioned could be specified: forms that might support multiple correct forms should not be auto-corrected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
