[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 Andreas Heinisch changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |andreas.heini...@yahoo.de |desktop.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #22 from Peter Toye --- (In reply to Aron Budea from comment #16) > (In reply to LeMoyne Castle from comment #14) > > Aron, the SID_xxx values are compile time constants that are available. If > > the SID_xxx, RID_xxx tables get messed up LibreOffice will almost certainly > > crash at start. > > My bad if I wasn't clear, I was not implying to meddle with the SID_xxx > constants, I was only referring to the property values stored with those IDs. > > > I think this is working as desired: the Overwrite value will be used if > > given, but if it's not LibO will only overwrite a file of the same name. > > No it isn't, it overwrites any file, not only if it has the same URL. > Plus if the desired behavior is to save over the same file, the store() > function is designed for that purpose. > > I'm not sure which core save routine in Writer you're reffering to, but if > you try to overwrite the same file with Save As... (which storeAsURL() > resembles the closest), it's not going to without asking first. Is anything happening on this? I reported it 6 years ago and the last comment was from Aron in 2015! There's not much point in a bug reporting system if the dev team dno't look at it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL ( or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #21 from Peter Toye --- (In reply to Peter Toye from comment #20) > Bug is still there in version 5.7.3 (latest stable). Version: 5.3.7.2 (x64) Build ID: 6b8ed514a9f8b44d37a1b96673cbbdd077e24059 CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.1; UI Render: default; Layout Engine: new; Locale: en-GB (en_GB); Calc: group Sorry forgot to add this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL ( or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #20 from Peter Toye --- Bug is still there in version 5.7.3 (latest stable). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL ( or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #19 from QA Administrators --- ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL ( or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #18 from Peter Toye --- It's now nearly a year since any comment was made on this subject. Is no-one looking at this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #17 from Peter Toye --- (In reply to Aron Budea from comment #15) So where does this leave us? At the moment the code and documentation differ - at least one should change. > I don't agree that it should ultimately be considered as an issue in the API > documentation, because the API usage is based on that documentation, and > users expect the functions to work as described there. If someone wanted to > use this function, they must've expected that Overwrite would be false by > default, based on the documentation. I agree with this, provided that changing the code to reflect the documentation isn't going to stop existing programs from working. > If they noticed the contradiction between the documentation and actual > behavior, and relied on the way it worked, that's a deliberate action (and a > serious mistake). One has to rely on the way it works, so it's not a mistake! I could have simply decided to remember each time I saved that it should be to a different file (unless I really wanted to overwrite). Of course I didn't and set the Overwrite flag to prevent overwriting. > On the other hand there might also be code out there that relies on the > documented default value of the Overwrite flag, and the bug simply went > unnoticed. ...and overwrote a file (as happened to me)! My personal view is that the code should be changed to reflect the documentation, which in my opinion is the desired behaviour. But I have no idea if the LO development team feel that current behaviour should take priority over documentation. Maybe someone from that team could comment. I'm only a user so I don't know the correct form to get action, but it's been 8 months since any comments on this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #16 from Aron Budea --- (In reply to LeMoyne Castle from comment #14) > Aron, the SID_xxx values are compile time constants that are available. If > the SID_xxx, RID_xxx tables get messed up LibreOffice will almost certainly > crash at start. My bad if I wasn't clear, I was not implying to meddle with the SID_xxx constants, I was only referring to the property values stored with those IDs. > I think this is working as desired: the Overwrite value will be used if > given, but if it's not LibO will only overwrite a file of the same name. No it isn't, it overwrites any file, not only if it has the same URL. Plus if the desired behavior is to save over the same file, the store() function is designed for that purpose. I'm not sure which core save routine in Writer you're reffering to, but if you try to overwrite the same file with Save As... (which storeAsURL() resembles the closest), it's not going to without asking first. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #15 from Aron Budea --- (In reply to lo from comment #13) > As I have written elsewhere, default behaviour which is destructive should > be deprecated, but I have a nasty feeling that we are rather stuck with it. > Apart from modifying the documentation to highlight this behaviour, is there > anything else we can do? I have done this in the tutorial > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Saving_a_document but as I am not an AOO or > LO developer I don't think I can (or should) modify the basic API > documentation without the agreement of the devlopment teams. I don't agree that it should ultimately be considered as an issue in the API documentation, because the API usage is based on that documentation, and users expect the functions to work as described there. If someone wanted to use this function, they must've expected that Overwrite would be false by default, based on the documentation. If they noticed the contradiction between the documentation and actual behavior, and relied on the way it worked, that's a deliberate action (and a serious mistake). On the other hand there might also be code out there that relies on the documented default value of the Overwrite flag, and the bug simply went unnoticed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #14 from LeMoyne Castle --- (In reply to Aron Budea from comment #12) > I'm by no means an expert, but after debugging this issue, the following > piece of code looks really suspicious: > ... > bool bRename = pRename && pRename->GetValue(); > bool bOverWrite = pOverWrite ? pOverWrite->GetValue() : !bRename; Aron, the SID_xxx values are compile time constants that are available. If the SID_xxx, RID_xxx tables get messed up LibreOffice will almost certainly crash at start. I think this is working as desired: the Overwrite value will be used if given, but if it's not LibO will only overwrite a file of the same name. I can see how overwriting a file of the same name can cause data loss and if one is in that situation then adding a time stamp to the file name will avoid the loss. The default is not exactly false, it is false (=no overwrite) except when the save would overwrite a file of the same name. This is a core save routine in Writer and no one would be happy with a word processor that insisted on asking about overwrites everytime a file was saved again. So, in my opinion, the issue is with the documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu --- Comment #12 from Aron Budea --- I'm by no means an expert, but after debugging this issue, the following piece of code looks really suspicious: In method SfxMedium::TransactedTransferForFS_Impl, here http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx#1586 : SFX_ITEMSET_ARG( GetItemSet(), pOverWrite, SfxBoolItem, SID_OVERWRITE, false ); SFX_ITEMSET_ARG( GetItemSet(), pRename, SfxBoolItem, SID_RENAME, false ); bool bRename = pRename && pRename->GetValue(); bool bOverWrite = pOverWrite ? pOverWrite->GetValue() : !bRename; The possibilities: -SID_OVERWRITE is set: that value is used -SID_OVERWRITE is not set: -SID_RENAME is set: the opposite of SID_RENAME is used -SID_RENAME is not set (bRename is false): bOverWrite becomes true <= this is what happens in example 3 I hope that helps. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #11 from Julien Nabet --- code pointers When it's ok: Breakpoint 5, SfxBaseModel::storeAsURL (this=0x76e8c50, rURL="file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test2.odt", rArgs=uno::Sequence of length 1 = {...}) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1662 1662impl_store( rURL, rArgs, false ); (gdb) p rArgs $11 = uno::Sequence of length 1 = {{Name = "Overwrite", Handle = 0, Value = uno::Any 1 '\001', State = com::sun::star::beans::PropertyState_DIRECT_VALUE}} or even: Breakpoint 5, SfxBaseModel::storeAsURL (this=0x76e8c50, rURL="file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test3.odt", rArgs=empty uno::Sequence) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1662 1662impl_store( rURL, rArgs, false ); When it's ko: Breakpoint 5, SfxBaseModel::storeAsURL (this=0x76e8c50, rURL="file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test4.odt", rArgs=uno::Sequence of length 1 = {...}) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1662 1662impl_store( rURL, rArgs, false ); (gdb) p rArgs $13 = uno::Sequence of length 1 = {{Name = "Overwrite", Handle = 0, Value = uno::Any 0 '\000', State = com::sun::star::beans::PropertyState_DIRECT_VALUE}} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||have-backtrace -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #10 from Julien Nabet --- It seems it's perhaps in fileaccess::TaskManager::endTask but I don't understand all this part. I can't help here :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #9 from Julien Nabet --- Trying to unwind with gdb, it seems to come from SfxMedium::Transfer_Impl(), see http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sfx2/source/doc/docfile.cxx#1732 I'll try to find some time to keep on -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #8 from Julien Nabet --- (gdb) p seqArguments $1 = uno::Sequence of length 1 = {{Name = "Overwrite", Handle = 0, Value = uno::Any 0 '\000', State = com::sun::star::beans::PropertyState_DIRECT_VALUE}} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #7 from Julien Nabet --- In gdb session with "catch throw ErrorCodeIOException", I could retrieved a bt, here's main part: #0 0x2bcb6dbd in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 #1 0x2ed7c994 in SfxBaseModel::impl_store (this=0x7306430, sURL="file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test4.odt", seqArguments=uno::Sequence of length 1 = {...}, bSaveTo=false) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:3137 #2 0x2ed7457e in SfxBaseModel::storeAsURL (this=0x7306430, rURL="file:///home/julien/compile-libreoffice/bugs/60237_macrostore/Test4.odt", rArgs=uno::Sequence of length 1 = {...}) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/sfx2/source/doc/sfxbasemodel.cxx:1662 #3 0x2aaac3d59fef in gcc3::callVirtualMethod(void*, unsigned int, void*, _typelib_TypeDescriptionReference*, bool, unsigned long*, unsigned int, unsigned long*, double*) () from /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/instdir/program/libgcc3_uno.so #4 0x2aaac3d58fc5 in cpp_call (pThis=0x692d600, aVtableSlot=..., pReturnTypeRef=0x648060, nParams=2, pParams=0x684ba80, pUnoReturn=0x7fff3c10, pUnoArgs=0x7fff3be0, ppUnoExc=0x7fff3c58) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx:231 #5 0x2aaac3d599df in bridges::cpp_uno::shared::unoInterfaceProxyDispatch (pUnoI=0x692d600, pMemberDescr=0x684c9e0, pReturn=0x7fff3c10, pArgs=0x7fff3be0, ppException=0x7fff3c58) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_x86-64/uno2cpp.cxx:429 #6 0x2aaad097bd43 in stoc_corefl::IdlInterfaceMethodImpl::invoke (this=0x684cce0, rObj= uno::Any { = {_vptr.XInterface = 0x7306328}, }, rArgs=uno::Sequence of length 2 = {...}) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/stoc/source/corereflection/criface.cxx:706 #7 0x2e4030e3 in SbUnoObject::Notify (this=0x755bbe0, rBC=..., rHint=...) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/classes/sbunoobj.cxx:2286 #8 0x2f685418 in SfxBroadcaster::Broadcast (this=0x6a23930, rHint=...) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/svl/source/notify/SfxBroadcaster.cxx:51 #9 0x2e50ea0e in SbxVariable::Broadcast (this=0x747d8f0, nHintId=65536) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/sbx/sbxvar.cxx:182 #10 0x2e508773 in SbxValue::SbxValue (this=0x76ce3e0, __vtt_parm=0x2e81a210 , r=..., __in_chrg=) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/sbx/sbxvalue.cxx:100 #11 0x2e50df92 in SbxVariable::SbxVariable (this=0x76ce3e0, __vtt_parm=0x2e81a208 , r=..., __in_chrg=) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/sbx/sbxvar.cxx:77 #12 0x2e500f12 in SbxMethod::SbxMethod (this=0x76ce3e0, r=..., __in_chrg=, __vtt_parm=) at /home/julien/compile-libreoffice/libreoffice/basic/source/sbx/sbxobj.cxx:900 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #6 from Julien Nabet --- Oups, forget what I indicated, I indeed reproduced the pb, here's the error message for the fourth file: BASIC runtime error. An exception occurred Type: com.sun.star.task.ErrorCodeIOException Message: SfxBaseModel::impl_store failed: 0x20d. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #5 from Julien Nabet --- Ok, I had a bug in my macro with file name, the macro runned successfully completely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #4 from Julien Nabet --- On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I got this error when launching macro: BASIC runtime error. An exception occurred Type: com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException Message: Unsupported URL : "type detection failed". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #3 from l...@ptoye.com --- I tried it with LO 4.3.5.2 under Windows 7 64-bit home premium. No change in behaviour. I think that this is an extremely annoying bug, even though the workaround is to ALWAYS use a property list when calling StoreToURL. The default behaviour overwrites a file without warning - never good behaviour for a default! At the very least the documentation should be changed to reflect the current behaviour of StoreToURL with a great big warning message. Apache don't seem to agree with me and think it's trivial. Having overwritten a file (fortunately backed up) by assuming that the documentation is correct I can't agree! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.4.0.3 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-02-19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60237] : Bug in API call StoreAsURL (or in the OO Basic API description)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60237 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Windows (All) |All Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||nopo...@novell.com, ||serval2...@yahoo.fr See Also||https://issues.apache.org/o ||oo/show_bug.cgi?id=121665 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Julien Nabet --- On pc Debian x86-64 with master source updated today. Noel: one for you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs