[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #16 from V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu ---
On Windows XP sp3 32-bit as guest OS in VMWare Workstation

Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 050248fea53adb6a14b649c5f84dd69a8faff997
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2013-10-04_08:16:05

This TB 39 build of master installs and runs without issue.

Setting Resolved Fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #17 from ape os...@yandex.ru ---
LibO-Dev_4.2.0.0.alpha0+ (ID: 050248fea53adb6a14b649c5f84dd69a8faff997,
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Time: 2013-10-04_08:16:05) started on Windows XP 64-bit
sp2 (last update).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #14 from ape os...@yandex.ru ---
@: Pedro; V Stuart Foote

  I changed the status to fixed because the TDF has not defined any member of
the Community (for example, Luboš or Fridrich) having a computer with the
necessary configuration, as one of the builders of the MSI package.
  I think that we have no right to demand that the volunteers replaced programs
on their computers in order to satisfy our interests.

Best regards, ape

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #15 from V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu ---
@ape,  you neglected to actually set the issue to fixed.

But that aside, TB 39 is TDF owned hardware issued/loaned to Kendy for
TinderBox build needs. Maintaining it is a volunteer effort as always--which
he's done with finesse. 

Also, a read of the TB Status page and logs (
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html ) shows today's posted
2013-10-03 7:14 TB 39 build was not built with the --with-windows-sdk=7.1A
compile flag;  but the 2013-10-03 10:51 build was. Meaning that later today or
tomorrow at the latest we will know if the issue has been fully resolved with a
working build for 32-bit Windows XP.

When available we can check out the build and then correctly close this
incident.

Stuart

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |---
 CC||ke...@suse.cz,
   ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu

--- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu ---
@Kendy,

A bit late, but got around today to doing an /A administrative install of TB 39
Windows build of master onto a 32-bit Windows XP sp3

Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 0d0d3a0540dad2d0f417e21df1183dfc33964357
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2013-09-30_23:58:26

I'd installed the Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Redistributable (x86),
11.0.60610.1, signed June 10 2013.

But on launch I am receiving error:

soffice.exe - Entry Point Not Found

The procedure entry point GetTickCount64 could not be located in the dynamic
link library KERNEL32.dll


Looks to be the same issue as OP, but on 32-bit XP. So question if the TB 39
build system has the Visual Studio Update 3 apparently needed to support
Windows XP builds, and if the _WIN32_WINNT declaration is set correctly? 
Should we be able to run this on 32-bit Windows XP? If so what C++ runtime is
needed if not the Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2012 Update 3
available at:

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #10 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
Is it really worth it to have a bug open for something that is not an error in
the source code, and not an error in an official build, but just a suboptimal
configuration of a tinderbox? Where do we promise that tinderbox builds would
be usable on XP?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu ---
Markus provides a hint on building in a note to the Dev list.

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Making-VS2012-builds-usable-with-XP-tc4076077.html

need to build with --with-windows-sdk=7.1A flag

Looking at the full build logs suggests that is not yet happening for the TB 39
builds of master.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #12 from V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 Is it really worth it to have a bug open for something that is not an error
 in the source code, and not an error in an official build, but just a
 suboptimal configuration of a tinderbox?

Sorry but if the fix is as simple as a compiler flag (or a compiler version
upgrade), then tracking the issue in BZ certainly is appropriate and in the
best interest of the project. This is especially true for the Windows and OS X
builds where substantive QA and UX feedback will only occur if the project
infrastructure provides functional TB builds for testing.

While it is common place for folks on Linux to roll their own--not at all so
for the Windows or OS X user community.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-10-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #13 from Pedro pedl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 Where do we promise that tinderbox
 builds would be usable on XP?

Nowhere. But it is frequently asked to QA people to start testing Master builds
as soon as possible in order to report bugs early in development.

Of course if TDF prefers to ignore Windows XP or exclude it from early testing
it just needs to say so.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

ape os...@yandex.ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||65675

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

ape os...@yandex.ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from ape os...@yandex.ru ---
@Maxim, Kendy:

Sorry, that's my confusion.
 I found the Assembly log file, which specifies to use MSVCR-2012u1. The
LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0_ Win-x86@39 runs on Windows XP 32\64-bit after
installing MSVCR-2012 update3.
 So is FIXED.
--
ape

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #2 from ape os...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 GetTickCount64 function available only in Windows Vista and up.
--
Thanks,
 But there is no information on the exclusion of Windows XP from the list of
supported operating systems. Therefore, I confirm the status critical for
this bug.
 Most likely the error is caused by building a package on a computer with
Windows-7/8.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #3 from Maxim momonas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
  But there is no information on the exclusion of Windows XP from the list of
 supported operating systems. Therefore, I confirm the status critical for
 this bug.
From what I understand, the list of supported platforms is for released
versions, not for daily builds.

  Most likely the error is caused by building a package on a computer with
 Windows-7/8.
Probably It was caused by using Windows SDK 8, which doesn't support building
for WinXP. See
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh852363.aspx#Requirements

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #4 from ape os...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 From what I understand, the list of supported platforms is for released
 versions, not for daily builds.
--

Maxim,
 the question about the operating system arises whenever there is no log
assembly. The Win-x86@39 does not contain such the file
(build-name_build_info.txt). I have to guess what is the reason for the failure
start.
--
ape

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #5 from Maxim momonas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 The Win-x86@39 does not contain such the file (build-name_build_info.txt).
Something like
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTERfull-log=1379673601.13747?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #6 from Maxim momonas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTERfull-
 log=1379673601.13747?
As you can see from that log (line 34), it uses Visual C++ 2012, which comes
with SDK 8.0 according to
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chuckw/archive/2012/08/15/visual-studio-2012-and-windows-8-0-sdk-rtm-are-now-available.aspx.

Also according to
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2012/10/08/10357555.aspx, Visual Studio
2012 Update 1 contains a repacked version of previous SDK (7.1) which can be
used with VC 2012 to target WinXP.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

--- Comment #7 from ape os...@yandex.ru ---
Maxim, thank You.

Kendy…
History and Memory suggests to me that NT-5.1\2 did not have a chance of
success. We'll have to wait for the beta.

ape

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start under Windows XP

2013-09-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

Maxim momonas...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||momonas...@gmail.com
Summary|LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0  |LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0
   |(Win-x86@39) cannot start   |(Win-x86@39) cannot start
   ||under Windows XP

--- Comment #1 from Maxim momonas...@gmail.com ---
GetTickCount64 function available only in Windows Vista and up. Source:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/ms724411(v=vs.85).aspx

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start

2013-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

ape os...@yandex.ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|medium  |highest

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69517] LibreOfficeDev-4.2.0.0 (Win-x86@39) cannot start

2013-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517

ape os...@yandex.ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs