[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2020-11-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #14 from b.  ---
for not to slip away in time ... imho a good idea, supporting the request, 

may be not absolutely easy, to have e.g. 834500 formatted as 'three
significant' (835000) while keeping! the exact input would require to store the
significance information in an additional field ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2019-03-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||107575


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107575
[Bug 107575] [META] Number format bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2015-08-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #9 from DF  ---
I most certainly think this enhancement should be considered at least medium if
not high priority. I went through undergraduate university and this was one of
the first things I found to be very clunky in all spreadsheet software and
having this feature would be a significant time saver and would benefit most of
the research area and the students. I've had to go through tables of data I've
entered and manually fix numbers. I've checked online and currently the best
solution in either this or Excel is to use a formula. Another field where this
would stand out is for anyone who wants to round numbers such as turning raw
data into user friendly (presentable). For example in finance or statistics one
would prefer to to present all their data to two sig figs for aesthetics (eg
1,342,554 becomes 1,300,000).

Just to give some kind of insight on the impact, about 20% of students are in
math, sciences and engineering for 16 countries. In Canada for example, there
are about 1M undergraduates. So I'd think it would be safe to say at least 3%
of the first-world population per year would likely find this feature to be of
benefit in their spreadsheet software of choice.

I should mention that significant figures also applies to non-decimal numbers
which is just as important as decimals. For example 123456 with 3 sig figs
would be 123000 or if someone divides 1100/3.0 the result should be shown as
370 not 367 or 366.667, but it is important not to round anything other than
visually so as not to incorporate rounding errors into subsequent calculations.

Another important part of significant figures is the rounding rules (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding) There would have to be a few options
for cases where the first non-significant figure is a 5. Normally one would
round up (ex 1.25 to 2 sig figs becomes 1.3) but there are also cases where one
may not want to round or and the case of 'round half to even'.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2015-08-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #10 from Joel Madero  ---
My last post on the issue - all in all it makes no difference as to how it's
marked. In order for this to be implemented a volunteer will have to find it to
be interesting - even if it was marked at "highest", it likely would not be
implemented tomorrow, next week, next month, or maybe even next year. It is
QA's responsibility to objectively prioritize enhancements. Asking for it to be
bumped over and over again (or changing it yourself) is not the way to get the
issue resolved/implemented.

If you *really* want another opinion (despite in reality it having no impact on
when/if the enhancement is implemented) I suggest emailing the QA list and
asking for a second opinion from an experienced QA member.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2015-08-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #11 from m.a.riosv  ---
Could someone attach a sample file with a column with the initial data, second
one how they must be rounded an a third on how must be showed, sorry but not
too much clear for me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2015-08-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #12 from DF  ---
Created attachment 118304
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=118304=edit
Examples of significant figures and rounding

Significant figures could be seen as a method of rounding for the purposes of
signifying accuracy. It does take some time to understand it well and students
are given lots of practice. There are lots of explanations on the web but
here's one nice one I've found:
http://tournas.rice.edu/website/documents/SignificantFigureRules1.pdf I've also
attached a spreadsheet of some examples.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2015-08-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #8 from kie...@gmail.com ---
"Another fine request. New Enhancement Low - for most users they'll not see
this as a hurdle. Might be relatively easy to add, requesting input."

By that measure you might as well give up and go home.

And, I am a 'most users' I want this feature, it's a royal pain to have to keep
fiddling with decimal places.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2015-04-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

Adolfo Jayme f...@libreoffice.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|NeedsDevEval|needsDevEval

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2014-07-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Whiteboard||NeedsDevEval
   Priority|medium  |low
 CC||jmadero@gmail.com
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #7 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com ---
Another fine request.

New
Enhancement
Low - for most users they'll not see this as a hurdle.

Might be relatively easy to add, requesting input.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2014-07-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #6 from DF devonfy...@gmail.com ---
For the last numeric example, 0.000890 is already 3 significant figures, and
yes 0.00 is meaningless. From left to right, you start counting your figures
from the first non-zero. Leading zeros don't count.

Significant figures are an integral part in taking measurements hence why it is
drilled into undergraduate science students (and likely engineers) and is
ubiquitous in research. This is not an enhancement which I thought up
overnight, I've been finding the lack of this feature a nuisance for years and
found it to be void of all spreadsheet software I've tried sofar (and I've
looked). I think it would make a great addition for productivity. I've
consulted others (who use Excel) and agreed this would be a useful feature.

A quick search shows me this is a commonplace, and there is no solution other
than workarounds such as using scientific notation, or using a formula.
http://spreadsheetpage.com/index.php/tip/rounding_to_n_significant_digits/
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=231129
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9t=25658
http://www.faculty.umassd.edu/michele.mandrioli/172cbook/fCHM1.B.3.html
I've looked extensively through feature requests too, and found none.

As for implementing it, it would likely be an option between displaying
specified number of decimal places or significant figures.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2014-06-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #5 from Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org ---
I think it is a false good idea because in some case there is no valid display.
For example with data like 120, 34.567 and 0.000890, if you want 3 significant
digit you will get 120, 34.5 and 0.00 which does not render the data correctly.

I agree that the scientific formatting suffers of aesthetic drawbacks but it is
always correct.

So I suggest to close this enhancement request as WontFix.

Best regards. JBF

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2014-06-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

DF devonfy...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

--- Comment #4 from DF devonfy...@gmail.com ---
Jean-Baptiste Faure, the scientific format is scientific notation and it so
happens the nature of it allows it work as I like however is a different
formatting and not particularily asthetically pleasing or practical for modest
numbers ex 123 vs 1.23E+2. I would like to keep precision while also keeping
the standard formatting.

m.a.riosv, thanks but the 'precision as shown' appears to be for calculations,
not formatting. It performs the calculations based on the precision shown and
not the exact value and thus would be prone to rounding errors for multiple
consecutive calculations. Im merely looking for a formatting option which
properly displays a desired number of significant figures (not decimal places)
and carries the formatting forward in calculations instead of having to do it
manually.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2014-06-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org ---
Hi DF,

Did you try the scientific format for numbers ? For me it does what you want.

Set status to NEEDINFO. Please set it back to UNCONFIRMED once you provided the
requested informations. Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards. JBF

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2014-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

m.a.riosv mari...@miguelangel.mobi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mari...@miguelangel.mobi

--- Comment #2 from m.a.riosv mari...@miguelangel.mobi ---
Hi DF, maybe the option in:
Menu/Tools/Options/LibreOffice calc/Calculate/General Calculations - Precision
as shown, is not what you want, but can help a bit.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2014-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

--- Comment #1 from DF devonfy...@gmail.com ---
related enhancement: bug# 77834

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77951] FORMATTING: Enhancement Request - Specify number of significant figures, not just decimal places.

2014-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77951

DF devonfy...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|FORMATTING: Enhancement |FORMATTING: Enhancement
   |Request - Specify   |Request - Specify number of
   |significant figures, not|significant figures, not
   |just decimal places.|just decimal places.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs