[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 92976] OPTIONS: desired order not applied to Font Replacement List

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92976

Michael Stahl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|backportRequest:4.4 |

--- Comment #7 from Michael Stahl  ---
remove "backportrequest" for EOL release branch

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 92976] OPTIONS: desired order not applied to Font Replacement List

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92976

raal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||r...@post.cz
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #5 from raal  ---
(In reply to Beluga from comment #3)
> 
> I set a whiteboard requesting a binary bisecting so the (now unknown) fix
> could be backported to 4.4.

Closing as WFM. No new version in 4.4, see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.4#4.4.7_release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 92976] OPTIONS: desired order not applied to Font Replacement List

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92976

--- Comment #4 from Marc PHILIPPE karb...@belgacom.net ---
(In reply to Beluga from comment #3)
 You could create a new report for that issue (after searchin for possible
 existing ones).

FYI, I submitted the question in bug 93099.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 92976] OPTIONS: desired order not applied to Font Replacement List

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92976

Beluga todven...@suomi24.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||bibisectRequest
   ||backportRequest:4.4

--- Comment #3 from Beluga todven...@suomi24.fi ---
(In reply to Marc PHILIPPE from comment #2)
  Marc: could you test with 5.0 and/or 5.1?
 
 Tested with LO 5.0.0 rc4.
 The bug doesn't show up in that version.
 
 One remaining insignificant issue:
 The triangle indicating the order
 - is on its base for a descending order
 - is on its tip for an ascending order,
 which is the opposite of the GUI standards.
 Nothing to feel upside down. :o)

You could create a new report for that issue (after searchin for possible
existing ones).

I set a whiteboard requesting a binary bisecting so the (now unknown) fix could
be backported to 4.4.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 92976] OPTIONS: desired order not applied to Font Replacement List

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92976

Beluga todven...@suomi24.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||todven...@suomi24.fi
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Severity|normal  |minor

--- Comment #1 from Beluga todven...@suomi24.fi ---
Repro with 4.4, but not with 5.1
You have to add a bunch of fonts starting with several different letters to
repro.

Marc: could you test with 5.0 and/or 5.1?

Win 7 Pro 64-bit, Version: 4.4.4.3
Build ID: 2c39ebcf046445232b798108aa8a7e7d89552ea8
Locale: fi_FI

Version: 5.1.0.0.alpha1+
Build ID: 902255645328efde34ddf62227c8278e8dd61ff0
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2015-07-30_03:52:07
Locale: en-US (fi_FI)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 92976] OPTIONS: desired order not applied to Font Replacement List

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92976

--- Comment #2 from Marc PHILIPPE karb...@belgacom.net ---
 Marc: could you test with 5.0 and/or 5.1?

Tested with LO 5.0.0 rc4.
The bug doesn't show up in that version.

One remaining insignificant issue:
The triangle indicating the order
- is on its base for a descending order
- is on its tip for an ascending order,
which is the opposite of the GUI standards.
Nothing to feel upside down. :o)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 92976] OPTIONS: desired order not applied to Font Replacement List

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92976

Marc PHILIPPE karb...@belgacom.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|OPTIONS: desired order not  |OPTIONS: desired order not
   |applied in Font Replacement |applied to Font Replacement
   |List|List

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs