[Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

2013-04-19 Thread Robinson Tryon
Per discussion at the meeting today, we generally agreed to the following:

AGREED: For users inquiring about tech support after the EOL date of a
release, we politely indicate that the release is EOL and ask them to
upgrade to a new version (or go talk to their vendor/distro/paid tech
support)

AGREED: We de-list versions in Bugzilla 6 months after the release has
been EOLed


Petr, Rainer (and others) -- What do you think about these timeframes?


Thanks,
--R
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


[Libreoffice-qa] Addressing regressions within a release

2013-04-19 Thread Robinson Tryon
As brought-up by Bjoern during the meeting, it's good for us if we can
identify how many regressions have been introduced during the course
of a (minor) release series of LibreOffice.

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/May_3#PENDING_ITEM:_Regressions_within_a_release

One good way to tackle this problem would be to bibisect any bug
marked as a regression and try to date it to before the X.X.0 point
release.

Joel - How much work would it be to bibisect the regressions for each
release? Aside from initial triage/repro, what other QA tasks should
take priority over this work?

--R
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice-QA] Conference Call 2013-04-19 - Agenda & Minutes

2013-04-19 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Sophie Gautier
 wrote:
>
> Concerning this item
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_19#PENDING_ITEM:_Documentation_for_Localized_French_BSA
>
> please consider that we (FR group) are acting as a community and not as
> individuals, so instead of adding Charles (who is already overwhelmed
> with his TDF activities and not interested in FR QA) add the FR QA list
> as a primary contact. You can write in English there and anybody in the
> team will react with the emergency your team needs.

Would it be possible for a couple of the FR QA Team members to come
say hi on IRC or the mailing list?  I believe that running an NLP BSA
will take some dedication and consistency over time, and I think it
could help for us to have a bit more of a repor in place between our
teams.

> Concerning this process
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BSA/Localization
> it seems a bit bureaucratic to me. Our team is dealing with bugs
> reported from our users list, forums or even directly by organization
> like MIMO for years now.

Cool! Is your process documented somewhere on the wiki? It would be
good to know how different NLP teams are addressing QA locally so that
perhaps we can coordinate our efforts and standardize our structures
as appropriate.

> We won't report each submissions as soon as
> it's reported via BSA if we consider it's not a bug or if it's a
> duplicate or if we don't have enough information.

Ah, interesting. Do you guys keep track of these submissions using
separate software, or just via threads on the mailing list?

Regarding duplicates, I think that it can be helpful to have that
information shared in the bug tracker, at least for helping us keep
track of bug frequency...but Joel, Rainer, and other more experienced
FDO wranglers may have a different opinion on the usefulness of such
information :-)

> May be before writing such a page we should wait to have the process in
> place already for one team, then see what are the usage/culture of the
> new team coming to participate and write a general policy from there.

I don't think that any of these things are set in stone -- we're all
very open to changing the ideas and policies as we see how things turn
out in practice. My impetus for creating some docs about management of
the BSAs was to try to reduce the workload on the QA Team and avoid an
issue where we might be stuck with an active NLP BSA and nobody on the
NLP team willing to take care of it.

In any case, a number of us are excited to get the FR BSA up and
running as soon as possible. It would be great if you could

1) Document on the wiki how the FR QA Team
  a) deals with bug submissions right now
  b) would like to deal with BSA submissions

2) Let us know what we can do to get the FR BSA running


Thanks,
--R
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Purposes for the Integer field types in LibO 4.0.2

2013-04-19 Thread Dan Lewis

Hello Robert,
 Thanks for the quick reply. You were right: I had a MySQL database 
when opened a table in Design View to see what the Field Types were in 
LO 4.0.2.2. I found MEDIUMINT when I searched my user guide for MySQL. 
It listed the lengths for these field types in terms of Bytes instead of 
bits. (I understand the meaning of both.) Once I saw what you had 
written, I understood how each of these lengths were written: 1 bit for 
the + or -, and the rest of the bits contain the number.
 I also have a copy of the HSQLDB 1.8 user guide on my hard drive 
and have seen this table there also.


--Dan

On 04/19/2013 02:37 PM, Robert Großkopf wrote:

Hello Dan,

the list you created I couldn't read so well, so I add a new list:
The data-types of the HSQLDB are defined in the description of the
HSQLDB. You can find the description here:
http://www.hsqldb.org/doc/1.8/guide/

[TINYINT]
-128 to 127

2⁸ (8 Bit) (-7 Bit to +7 Bit-1)

[SMALLINT]
-32,768 to 32,767

2¹⁶ (16 Bit) (-15 Bit to +15 Bit-1)

[INTEGER][INT]
-2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647

2³² (32 Bit) (-31 Bit to +31 Bit-1)

[BIGINT]
-9,223,372,036,854,775,808 to 9,223,372,036,854,775,807

2⁶⁴ (64 Bit) (-63 Bit to +63 Bit-1)

Hope this will be readable. All types have the same range as the Java-types.


   I have some questions about them.
1) What is the difference between [INT]  and [INTEGER]?

No difference, see the HSQLDB-description


2) Do they have the same range?

See 1)


3) What purpose does each of these field types serve?

With every type is described, how much memory is needed for it.


4) Is there a link that describes the information for all of the field
types used by the Table Design dialog?

The shown field-types are different when you use different databases.
For the fields-types of the HSQLDB you have to look in the description
of the HSQLDB


5) What is the range for [MEDIUMINT]?

This isn't shown in the GUI, when you open a HSQLDB. I have just opend
LO 4.0.3.1 for have a look. Tis type isn't a type of the HSQLDB. Could
be you have found this type, when connecting to a MySQL-database. The
range of this type is
2²⁴ (24 Bit)
The unsigned versions of the datatype you could not chose with the
HSQLDB. The Java-Integer-Datatypes are all signed.

Regards,

Robert
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Purposes for the Integer field types in LibO 4.0.2

2013-04-19 Thread Robert Großkopf
Hello Dan,

the list you created I couldn't read so well, so I add a new list:
The data-types of the HSQLDB are defined in the description of the
HSQLDB. You can find the description here:
http://www.hsqldb.org/doc/1.8/guide/
> [TINYINT]
> -128 to 127 
2⁸ (8 Bit) (-7 Bit to +7 Bit-1)
> [SMALLINT]
> -32,768 to 32,767
2¹⁶ (16 Bit) (-15 Bit to +15 Bit-1)
> [INTEGER][INT]
> -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647
2³² (32 Bit) (-31 Bit to +31 Bit-1)
> [BIGINT]
> -9,223,372,036,854,775,808 to 9,223,372,036,854,775,807
2⁶⁴ (64 Bit) (-63 Bit to +63 Bit-1)

Hope this will be readable. All types have the same range as the Java-types.

> 
>   I have some questions about them.
> 1) What is the difference between [INT]  and [INTEGER]?

No difference, see the HSQLDB-description

> 2) Do they have the same range?

See 1)

> 3) What purpose does each of these field types serve?

With every type is described, how much memory is needed for it.

> 4) Is there a link that describes the information for all of the field 
> types used by the Table Design dialog?

The shown field-types are different when you use different databases.
For the fields-types of the HSQLDB you have to look in the description
of the HSQLDB

> 5) What is the range for [MEDIUMINT]?

This isn't shown in the GUI, when you open a HSQLDB. I have just opend
LO 4.0.3.1 for have a look. Tis type isn't a type of the HSQLDB. Could
be you have found this type, when connecting to a MySQL-database. The
range of this type is
2²⁴ (24 Bit)
The unsigned versions of the datatype you could not chose with the
HSQLDB. The Java-Integer-Datatypes are all signed.

Regards,

Robert
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] mailing list administration - SPAM Sender Filters

2013-04-19 Thread Rainer Bielefeld

Hi all,

today I replaced lots of single E-Mail addresses in the sender 
blacklist by smart ReExp filters, what should find also similar 
addresses. I hope that will reduce amount of SPAM here, I will continue 
that rework soon.


Best regards


Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice-QA] Conference Call 2013-04-19 - Agenda & Minutes

2013-04-19 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi all,
On 19/04/2013 18:37, Joel Madero wrote:
> Thanks to Robinson we have a great new system for our agenda and minutes,
> minutes from today's meeting can be found here:
> 
> 
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_19

Concerning this item
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_19#PENDING_ITEM:_Documentation_for_Localized_French_BSA

please consider that we (FR group) are acting as a community and not as
individuals, so instead of adding Charles (who is already overwhelmed
with his TDF activities and not interested in FR QA) add the FR QA list
as a primary contact. You can write in English there and anybody in the
team will react with the emergency your team needs.

Concerning this process
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BSA/Localization
it seems a bit bureaucratic to me. Our team is dealing with bugs
reported from our users list, forums or even directly by organization
like MIMO for years now. We won't report each submissions as soon as
it's reported via BSA if we consider it's not a bug or if it's a
duplicate or if we don't have enough information.
May be before writing such a page we should wait to have the process in
place already for one team, then see what are the usage/culture of the
new team coming to participate and write a general policy from there.
Kind regards
Sophie

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


[Libreoffice-qa] Purposes for the Integer field types in LibO 4.0.2

2013-04-19 Thread Dan Lewis
Below is a table of Field Types for Integers, their lengths and ranges 
as listed in the LibreOffice 4.0.2.2 Base Table Design dialog.


/*Field Type name*/



/*Field Type*/



/*Length*/



/*Range*/

Tiny Integer



[TINYINT]



3



-128 to 127 (signed)
0 to 255

Small Integer



[SMALLINT]



5



-32,768 to 32,767

Integer



[MEDIUMINT]



7




Integer



[INTEGER]



10



-2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647

Integer



[INT]



10




BigInt



[BIGINT]



19



-9,223,372,036,854,775,808 to

9,223,372,036,854,775,807


 I have some questions about them.
1) What is the difference between [INT]  and [INTEGER]?
2) Do they have the same range?
3) What purpose does each of these field types serve?
4) Is there a link that describes the information for all of the field 
types used by the Table Design dialog?

5) What is the range for [MEDIUMINT]?

--Dan

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice-QA] Conference Call 2013-04-19 - Agenda & Minutes

2013-04-19 Thread Joel Madero
Thanks to Robinson we have a great new system for our agenda and minutes,
minutes from today's meeting can be found here:


https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_19


Best,
Joel

-- 
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2013-04-19 Thread Robert Großkopf
Hello *,
> 
>  2) ListBox has the wrong notion of "current value". Change it to
>  the right one incompatibly? Add a new "current *bound* value"
>  notion to stay compatible, but make the interesting thing
>  accessible in some way?
>   + has two lists of key/values pairs.
>   + with a one-to-one mapping between the two,
>   + values that are displayed; and another that is written.
>   + getCurrentValue - shouldn't return string displayed,
> but the value
>   + on a date-field; don't get Mon/1st/Jan - but an abstract date.
>   + not so clear as all that (Norbert/Eike)
>   + value written to field, not exposed at all (Lionel)
>   + API is a special exception for this box
>   + been there for a while.
>   + keeping back-compat there is important (Eike)
>   + introduce a new method - getActualCurrentValue
>   + or incompatibly extend the existing interface
>   + can we put it in a property instead ?

Good idea. I have searched a long time for solving this problem. Only
possibility now is to show a unique key-field as a part of the "current
value", start a query and have a look for the foreign-key, which is
bounded to the table/query of the form.

To keep it back-compat, this "bounded" value should better be reached by
"current bound value".

Regards

Robert
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/