[Libreoffice-qa] Meta tracker for Sidebar feature created

[Joren]

Hi,

I create a meta tracker for all bugs related to the new sidebar feature.
See: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65138

Although this is still an experimental feature, we can test it to gather
bugs related to this feature.
To enable it:
* Open LibreOffice
* Tools > Options > LibreOffice > Advanced
* Check "Enable experimental sidebar (on restart)"
* Restart LibreOffice
* Open Writer for example
* View > Sidebar

Kind regards,
Joren
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice-QA] Public Conference Call May 31st, 1300UTC

[Joel Madero]

Our bi-weekly conference call is here again.

This Friday at 1300 UTC:

Agenda currently unavailable but will be here as soon as possible:

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/May_31

We are doing the same thing as last time, google+ along with talkyoo. For
Google+ please add me (jmadero@gmail.com) or call in via talkyoo
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talkyoo

I will likely be doing video this time around but who knows :)


Warm Regards,
Joel

-- 
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] classifying bugs

[Kieran Peckett]

Once you have reproduced a bug, we mark it as NEW so that it can, from
there on, be passed on to the developers.


2013/5/29 José Guilherme Vanz 

> Hello, Folks!
>
> I was trying testing and simulating some bugs there are in the bugzilla
> and a doubt appeared. When can we set bug status for "confirmed"? Who do it?
>
> Thank you
> --
> Att. José Guilherme Vanz
> br.linkedin.com/pub/josé-guilherme-vanz/51/b27/58b/
> "O sofrimento é passageiro, desistir é para sempre" - Bernardo Fonseca,
> recordista da Antarctic Ice Marathon.
>
> ___
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems?
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
>
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] classifying bugs

[Joren]

Hi José,

First of all welcome!

José Guilherme Vanz schreef op 29/05/13 14:39:

Hello, Folks!

I was trying testing and simulating some bugs there are in the 
bugzilla and a doubt appeared. When can we set bug status for 
"confirmed"? Who do it?

Great! Thanks for that.
As an answer to your question: if you were able to confirm the mentioned 
behavior and you can't find duplicates around, you can set the bug 
status to 'NEW' for sure :-). Just make sure all required info is there, 
so others (and developers) can reproduce it to (like detailed steps, 
mentioned files/attachments are available, ...).


Maybe a bit overwhelming when you first read the info in following 
links, but it'll be of great help for sure:


* https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
* https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage#Details_of_Steps

If you have other questions, please don't hesitate :-).
Feel free to join us also at #libreoffice-qa 
(http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa). I really enjoy 
my time there, with nice people and if you have questions related to a 
bug report we can help you right away.


Nice to meet you :-)

Kind regards,
Joren
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice and Windows 2000

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Petr, all

> Isn't it possible to check for OS version and suggest the LO version
> > accordingly?
> >
> > This would be a good test for the upcoming EOL of Windows XP, in less
> than a
> > year from now :)
>
> It makes sense. Could you please report this into bugzilla and add
> ke...@suse.cz into CC? I am not sure if Kendy would have time to work on
> it but it might be a nice Easy Hack and he could add some code pointers.
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr
>
>
Added as enhancement requests
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65128 and
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65129

For some reason your email was not forwarded to the QA list. Let's see what
happens when I reply to all from Gmail

Cheers,
Pedro
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] classifying bugs

[José Guilherme Vanz]

Hello, Folks!

I was trying testing and simulating some bugs there are in the bugzilla and
a doubt appeared. When can we set bug status for "confirmed"? Who do it?

Thank you
-- 
Att. José Guilherme Vanz
br.linkedin.com/pub/josé-guilherme-vanz/51/b27/58b/
"O sofrimento é passageiro, desistir é para sempre" - Bernardo Fonseca,
recordista da Antarctic Ice Marathon.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO cgit services for current 4.1.0.0alpha1 builds

[V Stuart Foote]

Petr Mladek wrote
> Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:01 AMPetr Mladek [pmla...@suse.cz]
> Hi,
> 
> better late than never.

Thank you none the less...


> V Stuart Foote píše v Pá 10. 05. 2013 v 09:16 -0700:
>> So here is an interesting puzzler:
>> 
>> with announce of the libreoffice-4.1.0.0.alpha1 and availability of an
>> official pre-release build, a pull and install of the
>> LibreOfficeDev_4.1.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86.msi build displays a Build ID:
>> 67ce08e2c64a6615abc90d3a3c442f90d86fa69
>> 
>> Wanted to see what made the cut,  so where in FDO cgit would we locate
>> the
>> commit?
>> 
>> Likely I'm doing something wrong, bug
>> 
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=67ce08e2c64a6615abc90d3a3c442f90d86fa69
>> 
>> returns nothing for that commit against master, and there has never been
>> an
>> alpha tag there that I recall--as I always have queried for a commit by
>> range against master.   Is there an update that needs to propagate to
>> cgit,
>> or is this Windows Build ID bogus?
> 
> There were big problems with the aplha1 builds. We did not test build
> with all languages before doing the tag. It went out that we needed
> several other fixes to finish the build. The guys did incremental build.
> They added the fixes into the build tree and pushed them later. The
> result is that the pushed fix got another commit ID than the one used
> during the build.
> 
> I hope that it is not that big problem. It was the purpose of the alpha1
> build to catch these problems.
> 
> Anyway, we learned the lesson and will try to do more test builds before
> doing the tag next time :-)
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Petr

It is actually pretty functional, I just get a bit lost sometimes as scope
of the code base is way larger than anything I've followed in the past.  The
move to git  is very new and shiny to me, so no doubt in my mind I miss
things that should be obvious  :-)

Stuart



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/FDO-cgit-services-for-current-4-1-0-0alpha1-builds-tp4055215p4058487.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA for GSoC project

[Alexander Thurgood]

Le 28/05/13 16:15, Cao Cuong Ngo a écrit :

Hi,

Sounds good. I can test on OSX, Linux 32bit (Ubuntu-based), and possibly
WinXP.


Alex

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/