[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.0 RC2 available

2013-07-07 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dear Community,

The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of our new LibreOffice 4.1. The upcoming 4.1 will be our
sixth major release in two and a half years, and comes with a nice set
of new features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1 RC2 is not ready
yet for production use, you should continue to use LibreOffice 4.0.4
for that.

For further milestones towards 4.1, please refer to our release plan
timings here:

 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.1#4.1.0_release

You can find a (work-in-progress) list of new features for 4.1 on this
page - please feel free to extend with stuff we've missed, or amend
text-only descriptions with nice screenshots:

 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.1

The release is available for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X from our QA
builds download page at

  http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/

Should you find bugs, please report them to the FreeDesktop Bugzilla:

  https://bugs.freedesktop.org

A good way to assess the release candidate quality is to run some
specific manual tests on it, our TCM wiki page has more details:

 
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests#Full_Regression_Test
 
For other ways to get involved with this exciting project - you can
e.g. contribute code:

  http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/

translate LibreOffice to your language:

  http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice_Localization_Guide

or help with funding our operations:

  http://donate.libreoffice.org/

A list of known issues and fixed bugs with 4.1.0 RC2 is available
from our wiki:

  http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.1.0/RC2

Let us close again with a BIG Thank You! to all of you having
contributed to the LibreOffice project - this release would not have
been possible without your help.

Yours,

The Document Foundation Board of Directors

The Document Foundation, Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-07 Thread Pedro
Andras Timar-3 wrote
> It is in the review queue for 4.1.0:
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/4738/

Excellent! But it would make sense to let people know about that in
Bugzilla?

In Bugzilla you only get Whiteboard: BSA target:4.2.0 target:4.1.1

In any case, that was an example. I meant this (MAB regressions applied to
the nearest release) should be a general rule for Devs?



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/URGENT-Cherry-pick-regressions-to-next-release-tp4064385p4064427.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-07 Thread Andras Timar
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Pedro  wrote:
> Here is an example that will cause DATA LOSS for any user of 4.1.0 (it was
> cherry picked to 4.1.1)
>
> https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66420
>
> I believe this should be a QUALITY rule.

It is in the review queue for 4.1.0:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/4738/

HTH,
Andras
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


[Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-07 Thread Pedro
Hi all

I believe that if regressions in MAB are fixed then the patch MUST be
included in the following release. Otherwise there is no point in having
Release Candidates.

Here is an example that will cause DATA LOSS for any user of 4.1.0 (it was
cherry picked to 4.1.1)

https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66420

I believe this should be a QUALITY rule.

Just my 2 cents



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/URGENT-Cherry-pick-regressions-to-next-release-tp4064385.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/