Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ownCloud for Bugzilla - IMHO a no go
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:16 PM, bjoern wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:48:54PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: >> Idly wondering - are we fixing the right problem? How often does the >> case arise, what's the size distribution of those huge files, and is >> it really necessary to store those eternally? > > So _if_ this happens once in eternity, the wiki should be fine. If this > happens > regularly we should look into it more deeply. It's hard to know how big a problem this is because the filesize limit on bugzilla is absolute, and there's no integrated documentation telling people to upload large files elsewhere...so some number of people undoubtedly give up. > I honestly rather assume the first to be the case, given that there are 6000 > files on the wiki and skimming the biggest files(*) shows some (maybe 10?) > testcases uploaded there, but most of the big files are actually other stuff > (e.g. talkyoo mp3). Also, there are only about 250 files bigger than the > current bugzilla limit (3MB) at all. IIRC, Rainer set up the wiki page to host files that wouldn't fit in Bugzilla. I can't recall if the logs indicated that anyone else used the wiki for this purpose, if documentation was made available, etc. I do remember a couple of instances in which we couldn't upload files to Bugzilla due to size, and I have talked to users or seen comments in bug reports "File too big to upload to bugzilla" so this isn't just a theoretical problem anymore. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote: > My strong proposal is therefore to raise the attachment limit in our own > BugZilla instance when it's ready. By that, files are in the same tool, tied > to the same user accounts, and therefore also in the same backup. Sounds great to me. I would suggest we have some kind of fallback plan, even if it's "File too big to upload? Please see if you can shrink it in size or compress it before upload. If all else fails, please email us at ". There will always be corner cases, and it might be worth our time to keep an eye on them. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote: > My strong proposal is therefore to raise the attachment limit in our own > BugZilla instance when it's ready. By that, files are in the same tool, tied > to the same user accounts, and therefore also in the same backup. > > I don't now how long the BugZilla migration will take. If it's just a short > period of time, we can stay with ownCloud _TEMPORARILY_ and for a _LIMITED_ > amount of time, and then directly host things at BugZilla. > > Only if it will take too long, options #3-#6 look worthwhile to me. We are ready on our side to make the migration: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal Cloph passed along word from Tollef that he "hopes to get the first half done til the weekend," but also mentioned that [Tollef] is extremely busy and the migration is still in the planning phase. I'd suggest that we add the "File too big to upload?" message to FDO right now, were it not for the fact that such a request would take more time away from Tollef. So...I don't have a great answer. I guess I'd say "punt" and hope that we get some traction on migration this month. Best, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ownCloud for Bugzilla - IMHO a no go
Hi, bjoern wrote on 2013-12-03 14:57: That is ouf course intended in the end. But up until then the Wiki is still a better choice than ownCloud as most people already have accounts there. yes, _UNTIL THEN_, the wiki is better, as I don't have to manually approve accounts there. Emphasizing the "until then" part so heavily, so it's clear to everyone. ;-) And no matter to which value we will raise the limit in the new Bugzilla, there always will be freaky corner cases that might need more space. As essentially everything in bugzilla is there for eternity, we shouldnt raise the limit too high. So in the end, we need some form of storage anyway. Exactly that is the reason why the wiki is not the best solution in the long run either. Anything there is also for eternity, the database grows, we need larger backup storages - it is kind of a domino effect, unneeded for simply file storage. We share the same pain here. ;-) As the wiki has a rather high limit (25MB) and it should be possible to delete stuff again from there (right?), it doesnt look too bad a fallback to me for No, not totally, "some" database entries are always there in the end, so "deleting" is not the right word. :) So _if_ we are using a solution that kinda sucks, we should use _one_ (wiki) and not two (wiki and ownCloud). Yes, I agree, as long as it is temporarily. Yes, account creation makes all these a stillborn. For it is easier to tell the reporter to upload to his dropbox/UbuntuOne/Whatever and us to pick it up from there. I am of course happy with that as well, just as I am with other proposals. My only requirement is that uploading (not downloading) must be authenticated to avoid abuse, and that this authentication must be encrypted, which effectively rules out FTP. Towards anything else, I am open, of course. IMHO no. The wiki was used before for this, so lets not throw in another tool into the mix -- so lets roll back on ownCloud usage for this, and _stay_ with the wiki. Not because its the right solution, but because we introduced that already and we dont have anything better right now. Aka: lets not stack one temporary bandaid storage on top of another temporary bandaid storage. Lets stick with the first temporary bandaid (wiki). I agree. IMHO, the best solution we could hope for is something helping us like this - to let the enduser upload the file in question to the Dropbox-equivalent of his choice I agree so far. - then have a TDF service where our QA guys can throw an URL at (via email, webinterface, ssh login) - this service then downloads the file and saves it for us on our mirror Is that really required? It requires some development time (and everybody knows I lack those skills :-) - if it's temporarily anyways, why not just grabbing the file from Dropbox & co.? Oh, and welcome to the world of http://www.xkcd.com/1172/ ;) :D Florian (confused that reply-to-all on this lists does not include the original sender... so if you reply, Cc me manually) ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Squashtest
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Sophie wrote: > Hi all, > > As I'm really not happy that Moztrap doesn't handle localization, I'm > still searching for a replacement in the future. I've been pointed to > Squash, the site is here: > http://www.squashtest.org/index.php/en/squash-tm-25664/squash-tm-overview > where at least the UI is fully localizable. It handles manual test and > even automated tests and run on different versions and projects. > License is LGPLv3 after a version is one year old and it's written in Java. > I'll approach the company developing it to see how it could handles test > localization and will keep you informed. You can run an online demo if > you wish and don't hesitate to give me your feedback. Looks interesting -- I'm not that involved with manual tests right now, so I defer to your technical wisdom here. As you mentioned, the company is using a "delayed-open-source-release" model: http://www.squashtest.org/index.php/en/squash-tm-25664/sources-licence-squashtm What this might mean is that we can't (easily) upstream any changes/improvements to the software. I don't know how much we've customized MozTrap thusfar, but as long as we keep the source of our webapps in git (as well as any modifications thereof), I guess we can re-apply our changes on top of new versions without too much hassle. We could ask Cloph/Floeff their thoughts on the topic. Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Squashtest
Hello Sophie, *, On Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013 17:08 Sophie wrote: > As I'm really not happy that Moztrap doesn't handle localization, me neither, but ... > I'm still searching for a replacement in the future. I've been > pointed to Squash, the site is here: > http://www.squashtest.org/index.php/en/squash-tm-25664/squash-tm-overview > where at least the UI is fully localizable. If I understood their page right, you do not only need the Squash- TM, but also the Squash-SC, Squash-Data and Squash-TA as well to localise your tests, or am I wrong? > It handles manual test > and even automated tests and run on different versions and > projects. Well, maybe on their system ... ;) > License is LGPLv3 after a version is one year old and > it's written in Java. I'll approach the company developing it to > see how it could handles test localization and will keep you > informed. You can run an online demo if you wish and don't > hesitate to give me your feedback. Cheers I made the mistake to download their Squash-TM package (http://www.squashtest.org/index.php/en/downloads/finish/17-version-stable/83-squash-tm-1-7-5-windows-mac-linux-tar-gz), unpacked it and started bin/startup.sh (as described on https://sites.google.com/a/henix.fr/wiki-squash-tm/installation-and-exploitation-guide/3---run-and-stop-squash-tm). But after nearly three minutes I was not able to do anything, as my /tmp directory was up to 100% ... :( And a restart of my system leads to an nonfunctional system (or better say: A system with no X, though KDM was running) ... :( If you really want to install it on one of the TDF servers, please test it first at your own system (one, that has more power / is newer than mine etc. ... ;) ). I only found the solution to reinstall my Debian, as all tips I found online did not help here ... :( HTH Thomas. -- Will stain. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Squashtest
Hi Thomas, Le 04/12/2013 14:17, Thomas Hackert a écrit : > Hello Sophie, *, > On Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013 17:08 Sophie wrote: >> As I'm really not happy that Moztrap doesn't handle localization, > > me neither, but ... > >> I'm still searching for a replacement in the future. I've been >> pointed to Squash, the site is here: >> http://www.squashtest.org/index.php/en/squash-tm-25664/squash-tm-overview >> where at least the UI is fully localizable. > > If I understood their page right, you do not only need the Squash- > TM, but also the Squash-SC, Squash-Data and Squash-TA as well to > localise your tests, or am I wrong? I'm not sure you need all the suite. But I don't see a mechanism where if the source language of the test is updated, the translated test is informed. There is a doc about UI here: https://sites.google.com/a/henix.fr/wiki-squash-tm/developer/04---developer-s-guide/internationalization-guidelines > >> It handles manual test >> and even automated tests and run on different versions and >> projects. > > Well, maybe on their system ... ;) > >> License is LGPLv3 after a version is one year old and >> it's written in Java. I'll approach the company developing it to >> see how it could handles test localization and will keep you >> informed. You can run an online demo if you wish and don't >> hesitate to give me your feedback. Cheers > > I made the mistake to download their Squash-TM package > (http://www.squashtest.org/index.php/en/downloads/finish/17-version-stable/83-squash-tm-1-7-5-windows-mac-linux-tar-gz), > unpacked it and > started bin/startup.sh (as described on > https://sites.google.com/a/henix.fr/wiki-squash-tm/installation-and-exploitation-guide/3---run-and-stop-squash-tm). > But after nearly > three minutes I was not able to do anything, as my /tmp directory > was up to 100% ... :( And a restart of my system leads to an > nonfunctional system (or better say: A system with no X, though KDM > was running) ... :( If you really want to install it on one of the > TDF servers, please test it first at your own system (one, that has > more power / is newer than mine etc. ... ;) ). I only found the > solution to reinstall my Debian, as all tips I found online did not > help here ... :( Ho, I'm really sorry you had to reinstall your system, this is really not a good point for this software :( but thank you very much for your tests and your feedback. I'll keep you informed when I'll meet the developers. Cheers Sophie ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Squashtest
Hello Sophie, *, On Mittwoch, 4. Dezember 2013 15:00 Sophie wrote: > Le 04/12/2013 14:17, Thomas Hackert a écrit : >> On Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2013 17:08 Sophie wrote: >>> I'm still searching for a replacement in the future. I've been >>> pointed to Squash, the site is here: >>> http://www.squashtest.org/index.php/en/squash-tm-25664/squash-tm-overview >>> where at least the UI is fully localizable. >> >> If I understood their page right, you do not only need the >> Squash- TM, but also the Squash-SC, Squash-Data and Squash-TA as >> well to localise your tests, or am I wrong? > > I'm not sure you need all the suite. well, on the site you linked above, they write Squash TM and other modules Squash TM is the central element of the Squash toolset. It interacts with : Squash TA for the automation part (run of automated tests campaign and consolidation of results), Squash Data for data management (automatic injection of data set for manual test) Squash SC for the management of planning and resources. , so I think, we will need at least SC and Data ... ;) > But I don't see a mechanism > where if the source language of the test is updated, the > translated test is informed. There is a doc about UI here: > https://sites.google.com/a/henix.fr/wiki-squash-tm/developer/04---developer-s-guide/internationalization-guidelines Well, yes ... But this documentation is for devs, who want to help developing Squash TM, not for for users, who want to translate their tests in different languages ... ;) >>> License is LGPLv3 after a version is one year old and >>> it's written in Java. I'll approach the company developing it to >>> see how it could handles test localization and will keep you >>> informed. You can run an online demo if you wish and don't >>> hesitate to give me your feedback. Cheers >> >> I made the mistake to download their Squash-TM package >> (http://www.squashtest.org/index.php/en/downloads/finish/17-version-stable/83-squash-tm-1-7-5-windows-mac-linux-tar-gz), >> unpacked it and started bin/startup.sh (as described on >> https://sites.google.com/a/henix.fr/wiki-squash-tm/installation-and-exploitation-guide/3---run-and-stop-squash-tm). >> But after nearly three minutes I was not able to do anything, as >> my /tmp directory was up to 100% ... :( And a restart of my >> system leads to an nonfunctional system (or better say: A system >> with no X, though KDM was running) ... :( If you really want to >> install it on one of the TDF servers, please test it first at >> your own system (one, that has more power / is newer than mine >> etc. ... ;) ). I only found the solution to reinstall my Debian, >> as all tips I found online did not help here ... :( > > Ho, I'm really sorry you had to reinstall your system, this is > really not a good point for this software :( but thank you very > much for your tests and your feedback. I'll keep you informed when > I'll meet the developers. Yes, please :) Greetings Thomas. -- Barach's Rule: An alcoholic is a person who drinks more than his own physician. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libo-marketing-priv] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 beta1 test builds available
On 23/11/13 17:47, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ Hi, I have downloaded and installed the Mac version, but once installed - apparently without problems - when I double click the icon I get the message that the program is damaged and should be thrashed. I have repeated the procedure three times, with the same results. I am running MacOS X Mavericks on a brand new MacBook Air (latest hardware and OS, with 4GB of RAM). Has anyone else experienced the same problem? Thanks, Italo -- Italo Vignoli - it...@italovignoli.com mob +39.348.5653829 - sip 5316...@messagenet.it skype italovignoli - hangout italo.vign...@gmail.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libo-marketing-priv] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 beta1 test builds available
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote: > On 23/11/13 17:47, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ > > Hi, I have downloaded and installed the Mac version, but once installed > - apparently without problems - when I double click the icon I get the > message that the program is damaged and should be thrashed. Did you install a language-pack ? _before_ running Libreoffice for the first time ? Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libo-marketing-priv] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 beta1 test builds available
On 04/12/13 17:12, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Did you install a language-pack ? _before_ running Libreoffice for the > first time ? To install LO 4.2 Beta you must get rid of the security check for applications, and allow applications downloaded from everywhere. Beta is probably not yet signed. -- Italo Vignoli - it...@italovignoli.com mob +39.348.5653829 - sip 5316...@messagenet.it skype italovignoli - hangout italo.vign...@gmail.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libo-marketing-priv] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 beta1 test builds available
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote: > On 04/12/13 17:12, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> Did you install a language-pack ? _before_ running Libreoffice for the >> first time ? > > To install LO 4.2 Beta you must get rid of the security check for > applications, and allow applications downloaded from everywhere. Beta is > probably not yet signed. actually it _is_ signed... it is not a --enable-release-build yet... (which change the name for LODev.app to LibreOffice.app) but I do have --enable-macsox-code-signing='' in the conf I use to do the release build Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug in Fax-Wizard of LibO 4.1.4 and 4.2.-beta (was: Re: Issue with Fax-Wizard in current Build)
Hello, Am 03.12.2013 23:13, schrieb Andreas Mantke: > Hello, > > I tried to create a new fax with the wizard. I choose a business fax in > classic style from private. Before I did that I added my personal data > including email address and private phone number to the tools-options > menu. The fax was created but there were only my address in the header > and the placeholder on the left side. The fields on the right side were > blank (no personal data, e.g. no phone number, email address). > > I tested this with my own build from the current source (Version: > 4.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: b40dcdf4f5a03b71fe9e45f8f24fcaf25fd2febf) I tested the wizard with LibreOffice 4.1.4-1 (from our repo) and 4.2.0-beta on my openSuSE 12.3-x64 and I got the same experience: My name is missing in the header of the fax. The header contains only: street with number, city, zip-code. Besides the missing name the city and zip-code are in the wrong order ( without comma is the correct order). Then the fields on the right side of the body are empty (there are only the title of the fields: 'Fax:', 'Tel.:', 'E-Mail:'). There is no information about the from above this fields. The language setting of the created fax document is English (USA) and should be German. Once I called the wizard I got a preview of the fax with my name in the header and on the right side of the body. The fax wizard is nearly useless in this shape and we should fix this. I recommend that we run tests on all the wizards in Writer and fix located bugs (not only in 4.2 but also in 4.1.x). Regards, Andreas -- ## Developer LibreOffice ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows ## http://LibreOffice.org ## Support the Document Foundation (http://documentfoundation.org) ## Meine Seite: http://www.amantke.de ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] MacOSX bibisect for 4-2
a bibisect repo covering the 4-2 period from the branch point of the 4.1 release branch to few days ago on the libreoffcie-4-2 branch is now available at git://dev-downloads.libreoffice.org/bibisect_mac_lo42.git a tar.bz2 snapshot of the repo is available for http download at http://dev-downloads.libreoffice.org/MacOS_Bibibsect/ That repo contains 2732 build for 5.42 GB starting at commit 02021163dbbcc8904da0b2138c8b53684dcc8ab4 Author: Noel Grandin Date: Tue May 21 13:52:07 2013 +0200 fdo#46808, Convert oox::PowerPointExport service to new style The service already existed, it just needed an IDL file Change-Id: I1404f4f60abafd489ddfb7294affcc7ff33885ce and ending at commit 80373a6969fd8d3c19231041e465372cf03f53f2 Author: Markus Mohrhard Date: Sun Dec 1 04:45:36 2013 +0100 fix 2D vs 3D coordinatesystem regression, fdo#67300 regression from 088e86b865062dd4cc5ba0c85c6068dea62238db Note the log of that repo looks like: commit c5b9a799f9d24eba970966f1afabfe931574e933 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Tue Dec 3 12:48:46 2013 -0600 source sha:80373a6969fd8d3c19231041e465372cf03f53f2 source sha:80373a6969fd8d3c19231041e465372cf03f53f2 source sha:666ef5425e4e7e1a01c3dddbd0d847fec193176a source sha:b9410131861af3a5f54d0585dfc47e5f512e0320 source sha:d0f664014d02e02fbcfa80c118a0950f45513ada source sha:5ce4d7233fa3ea627cfbdc97a68d2b23e4abd057 source sha:1fee10725dbd62e78fd3ae14f0bd7872eabff3f9 source sha:78f227e1371ef4d11bc98e2116a3b95bb881b020 source sha:642df5d716f858f1f6b3d6219132c3323032975a source sha:79384a8f6049d10fd581e782deb57db653ac1a25 source sha:ca1dfd2119d97f949e76766b98d2917c40ccf92c commit 91bba033d12008dcefb0258b79365668a557e04b Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Tue Dec 3 12:48:00 2013 -0600 source sha:829621680b028909d58b0480a78a6aee7154f31a source sha:829621680b028909d58b0480a78a6aee7154f31a source sha:be6bed2ca4083039bfcbd62f9603efa3a0bdd3dc source sha:7646af0e114d0a644e4705bba3ab4219bb99a349 source sha:3367381d2b579d90b209756f9ec5c06b012e9798 source sha:6e5dc4c7a344d9c3530a69537929090dedb8f275 where the first source sha: line is the source cha that was used to build that particular bibisect commit and the rest of the commit message list the source commit that are between taht bibisect commit and the previous bibisect commit To find a bibisect commit that first contain a given source sha, you can therefore use git log --grep to find the source sha asocaited witht he first commit of the bibisect repo do git log --grep BEGIN_BIBISECT v $git log --grep BEGIN_BIBISECT commit e47ec366529846e008a4db27c8c507cdc7714c78 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Sun Nov 10 19:12:32 2013 -0600 source sha:02021163dbbcc8904da0b2138c8b53684dcc8ab4 source sha:02021163dbbcc8904da0b2138c8b53684dcc8ab4 tag:BEGIN_BIBISECT Happy bibisecting Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
