[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.5 RC2 test builds available

2014-02-01 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *,

for the upcoming new version 4.1.5, the builds for rc2 are now
available on pre-releases

Source-indexed dbug symbols for windows are available from our symbol server
http://dev-downloads.libreoffice.org/symstore/symbols

see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/How_to_get_a_backtrace_with_WinDbg
on how to make use of it

RC2 is the second of two planned release candidates, see

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.1#4.1.5_release

for the complete schedule.

Grab the builds from here here:

 http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/

The builds include the full set of languages.

If you've a bit of time, please give them a try  report any severe
bugs not yet in bugzilla here, so we can incorporate  them into the
release notes. Please note that it takes approximately 24 hours to
populate the mirrors, so that's about the time we have to collect
feedback.

The list of fixed bugs relative to 4.1.5 RC1 is here:

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugs-libreoffice-4-1-5-release-4.1.5.2.log

So playing with the areas touched there also greatly appreciated  -
and validation that those bugs are really fixed.

Thanks a lot for your help,
Christian
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.5 RC2 test builds available

2014-02-01 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:15:44 +0100, Christian Lohmaier  
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:



Hi *,

for the upcoming new version 4.1.5, the builds for rc2 are now
available on pre-releases

...

RC2 is the second of two planned release candidates, see

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.1#4.1.5_release

for the complete schedule.


just a reminder that list of fixed bugs is not yet available in
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/WikiAction/edit/Releases/4.1.5/RC1

and in
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/WikiAction/edit/Releases/4.1.5/RC2


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Trendline equation

2014-02-01 Thread Stefan Weigel
Hi again,

Am 31.01.2014 12:35, schrieb Laurent BP:

 Stefan Weigel wrote
  1. Enter Data A1=11, A2=13, A3=12, A4=14, A5=16, A6=15
  2. Select A1:A6
  3. 4. Create a Line chart
  4. Insert linear trendline and show equation
  
  -- Equation does make sense.

 If you do not specify X-values/categories, what sense can you give in the
 equation for 'x'?
 From my point of view, equation is useful if you need to extrapolate or
 interpolate values. What else?

Sure.

A1= Oct | B1= 1100 US$
A2= Nov | B2= 1300 US$
A3= Dec | B3= 1200 US$
A4= Jan | B4= 1400 US$
A5= Feb | B5= 1600 US$
A6= Mar | B6= 1500 US$

Create a Column chart. Insert formula.
Formula reads: f(x) = 88,57x + 1040

You can use the formula displayed in a Line chart or Column chart in
order to extrapolate the row to the following months. X would be the
number of the month, counting from October = 1.

Extrapolate July: f(x=10) = 1926

No matter if you do specify X-values or categories or not. Anyway,
there are lots of cases, where the formula is usefull in a regular
chart that does not need to be a XY chart.

Stefan.


-- 
LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir!
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


[Libreoffice-qa] FDO Cleanup

2014-02-01 Thread Joel Madero
Hi All,

Just got done with a large FDO cleanup so apologies for any flood in the
email - any FDO mails in the last 5 minutes or so can be ignored/deleted
as they just contain a standard message for NEEDINFO bugs.



All the best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO Cleanup

2014-02-01 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 03:07:23 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com  
wrote:



Hi All,

Just got done with a large FDO cleanup so apologies for any flood in the
email - any FDO mails in the last 5 minutes or so can be ignored/deleted
as they just contain a standard message for NEEDINFO bugs.



All the best,
Joel



just curious to know if you have detailed stats about each one of this  
NEEINFO--INVALID cleanups

how many of the bugs become INVALID?

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


[Libreoffice-qa] Proposed mass bug change

2014-02-01 Thread Florian Reisinger

Hi,

For statistic purpose it would be nice to clean out all RESOLVED bugs ( 
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?order=Importancelist_id=389594chfieldto=Nowchfield=bug_statusquery_format=advancedchfieldfrom=-12mchfieldvalue=RESOLVEDbug_status=RESOLVEDproduct=LibreOffice 
), currently 6741 [which is a good number] to their CLOSED state ( e.g 
RESOLVED - NOTABUG to CLOSED - NOTABUG). The total number of closed 
bugs would jump from ~1100 to ~8000 and the resolved from ~14500 to 8000.


Why this is important? RESOLVED can and should be changed back (RESOLVED 
- WFM 1 person says it works for him). Closed is something like buried 
in the grave of bugzilla.


I hope you agree, that RESOLVED is somewhat temporary and CLOSED as 
the final step


PS: Sorry for being little active. Background work for the Bisect 
GUI is all I can do now :(


--
Liebe Grüße | Yours,
Florian Reisinger


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/