Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:24:44 +0100, Joel Madero wrote: For now I'm not doing this just because there are so many other things to do and as of now I'm not seeing a clear message as to what we're doingI've seen at least 3-4 proposals with different links and the like. I suggest this be resolved on QA call, finalized, maybe a wiki written as to what the plan is, then we can move forward. I agree with you. QA call must decide that. regarding the multiple links you saw they are only because of different periods of time selected (1 year, 6 months, 100 days etc etc)... again the correct timeframe we want to ping has to be decided with the QA team. moreover we have to decide if pinging just UNCONFIRMED old bugs or even NEW bugs (excluding the easy hacks). in recent weeks I've seen many of UNCONF and NEW old bugs turning into WFM after retest with recent LibO releases (by me or other QA guys like beluga and Stuart Foote) --- Questa e-mail è priva di virus e malware perché è attiva la protezione avast! Antivirus. http://www.avast.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:39 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > + would be nice to have some blog-posts / picture posts (Bjoern) I just finished mine. http://kohei.us/2014/11/03/seattle-librefest/ Kohei ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ... - correction ...
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 11:38 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:39 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > * Seattle Hackfest (Robinson/Norbert) > ... > > + badly need ways to stop 'building' consuming the hack-fest (Michael) > > + or a way to keep hand-holding after the hack-fest (Bjoern) > ... > > + vast majority of people wanted access to VM > > + monster communication problem with cloph ... > > + Robinson was briefed on how to do that (cloph) > > + Info emailed to hackfest devs (Robinson) > > -> communication droppeded <- > > Incidentally it was just pointed out to me that "monster communication > problem with cloph" could read as some hyper-criticism of him =) that's > by no means the case - as (I hope) the context points out as we started > to dig deeper there were probably several failures of communication / > preparedness on the topic somewhere in the gap between cloph -> Robinson > -> other mentors -> hack-fest attendees. And also, my comment was never meant as a criticism of "someone not doing the job". It was rather a simple piece of feedback that I hoped would be useful for future hackfest planning. So, let's not take this as a "failure" please. We had a successful hackfest, and everybody chipped in what they could. No need to paint this negatively. Kohei ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Hi Cor, >> Robert Großkopf wrote on 04-11-14 16:34: >>> Sometimes I reported bugs and the bugs where set to "New" directly by >>> the system, not by me. Don't know why the system decided the bug is >>> confirmed and new ... >> >> I think that depends on how you start. >> When you start from https://bugs.freedesktop.org/query.cgi and select >> new at the top and then Libreoffice, it will be UNCONFIRMED >> >> When you start from the link "File a new bug in the "LibreOffice" >> product" > > available after running a query... That's it. Most times I run a query for see all open bugs of Base - then I start from the query with "File new ..." Robert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
On 11/04/2014 08:13 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 17:06: >> On 11/04/2014 07:58 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: >>> Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 16:34: @ Cor - if you'd like you can take a look yourself and move them to NEW >>> Thanks for explaining Joel. >>> By how did they end in the wrong REOPENED state in the first place? >> I have been looking at the history to see if the bug was ever marked as >> NEW - I touched about 55 bugs yesterday and some moved directly to NEW. >> As to how they got to REOPENED status - who knows, sometimes a user >> incorrectly set it after a bug was set to NEEDINFO, sometimes a QA >> member incorrectly set it, etc . . . it's hard to say that there is >> consistency. > Trying to get consistency is good. But I'm quite confident that it's > hard too with may different /new volunteers. > And people - like me - not looking too much at documentation, for some > reason.. Indeed it's hard but to me that doesn't mean ignore the problem. REOPENED bugs are literally ignored by everyone - devs don't touch them, QA don't touch them, they just sit forever. 275 isn't too bad for me to handle alone and get them either into NEW or to UNCONFIRMED. After this point, we can keep track of them better and keep them under control by spreading out the work amongst all the volunteers. Not paying attention to documentation shouldn't prevent us from at least trying to do it right ;) Warm Regards, Joel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Cor Nouws wrote on 04-11-14 17:18: > Robert Großkopf wrote on 04-11-14 16:34: >> Sometimes I reported bugs and the bugs where set to "New" directly by >> the system, not by me. Don't know why the system decided the bug is >> confirmed and new ... > > I think that depends on how you start. > When you start from https://bugs.freedesktop.org/query.cgi and select > new at the top and then Libreoffice, it will be UNCONFIRMED > > When you start from the link "File a new bug in the "LibreOffice" > product" available after running a query... > product" that sets it to NEW. > > Anyway, that's what I think ;) > > -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org - volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Robert Großkopf wrote on 04-11-14 16:34: > Sometimes I reported bugs and the bugs where set to "New" directly by > the system, not by me. Don't know why the system decided the bug is > confirmed and new ... I think that depends on how you start. When you start from https://bugs.freedesktop.org/query.cgi and select new at the top and then Libreoffice, it will be UNCONFIRMED When you start from the link "File a new bug in the "LibreOffice" product" that sets it to NEW. Anyway, that's what I think ;) -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org - volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ... - correction ...
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > And also, my comment was never meant as a criticism of "someone not > doing the job". It was rather a simple piece of feedback that I hoped > would be useful for future hackfest planning. > > So, let's not take this as a "failure" please. We had a successful > hackfest, and everybody chipped in what they could. No need to paint > this negatively. > I would like to add, in a more general sens: the point of these ESC call is, in big part, to discuss and review 'pain points', thinks that are causing trouble, hindering work, etc... and to try to find practical and actionable solutions to re-mediate, improve things... it is never to 'assign blame'. So, to all readers of the minutes out there, always assume the former not the later :-) Norbert. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 17:06: > > On 11/04/2014 07:58 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: >> Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 16:34: >>> @ Cor - if you'd like you can take a look yourself and move them to NEW >> Thanks for explaining Joel. >> By how did they end in the wrong REOPENED state in the first place? > > I have been looking at the history to see if the bug was ever marked as > NEW - I touched about 55 bugs yesterday and some moved directly to NEW. > As to how they got to REOPENED status - who knows, sometimes a user > incorrectly set it after a bug was set to NEEDINFO, sometimes a QA > member incorrectly set it, etc . . . it's hard to say that there is > consistency. Trying to get consistency is good. But I'm quite confident that it's hard too with may different /new volunteers. And people - like me - not looking too much at documentation, for some reason.. > So I suppose I'll apologize if I move any of yours to UNCONFIRMED - > there are only 27 more that you are cc'ed on and I'll try to be "extra > careful" with these - but currently the REOPENED status are completely > ignored by QA because they are not consistent. "Management" of these > bugs (ie. moving them correctly to the right status, or at least an > effort to do so) is better than continuing to ignore them. Hè hè ;) As written, I'll try half an hour this evening to look at some of the 27. Thanks for your work and patience here. Cor -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org - volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
On 11/04/2014 07:58 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 16:34: >> @ Cor - if you'd like you can take a look yourself and move them to NEW > Thanks for explaining Joel. > By how did they end in the wrong REOPENED state in the first place? I have been looking at the history to see if the bug was ever marked as NEW - I touched about 55 bugs yesterday and some moved directly to NEW. As to how they got to REOPENED status - who knows, sometimes a user incorrectly set it after a bug was set to NEEDINFO, sometimes a QA member incorrectly set it, etc . . . it's hard to say that there is consistency. So I suppose I'll apologize if I move any of yours to UNCONFIRMED - there are only 27 more that you are cc'ed on and I'll try to be "extra careful" with these - but currently the REOPENED status are completely ignored by QA because they are not consistent. "Management" of these bugs (ie. moving them correctly to the right status, or at least an effort to do so) is better than continuing to ignore them. Best, Joel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 16:34: > @ Cor - if you'd like you can take a look yourself and move them to NEW Thanks for explaining Joel. By how did they end in the wrong REOPENED state in the first place? And if someone looks at the bugs, can that person pls look at details and history him/herself to see if the status has to be NEW? Sorry that I need to avoid this work. I spent some time on testing and try to set fields to my best knowledge. When there's time left (what isn't the case) there are some nasty cases that I have to file, jump to help translation etc. MC improvements, .. Kind Regards, Cor -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org - volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Hey Robert, > Hi Joel, > >> Furthermore, some >> of those bugs were "self confirmed" which we recommend against. That >> being said, if a bug is confirmed and I set it to UNCONFIRMED just set >> it to NEW and move onthere were 350+ bugs incorrectly set...you'll >> see more moving to UNCONFIRMED if they were set incorrectly to begin >> with. > Sometimes I reported bugs and the bugs where set to "New" directly by > the system, not by me. Don't know why the system decided the bug is > confirmed and new ... Yeah there are some fun hiccups in bugzilla ;) But all in all: New = Confirmed; Unconfirmed = not confirmed; Reopened = bug is assigned to a developer who claimed they fixed it but the issue can still be reproduced on a later version of LibreOffice. Sometimes you have to put a bug into NEEDINFO and then move it to another status (for instance you can't go directly from REOPENED to UNCONFIRMED - which is kind of crappy ;) ) Best, Joel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Hi Joel, > Furthermore, some > of those bugs were "self confirmed" which we recommend against. That > being said, if a bug is confirmed and I set it to UNCONFIRMED just set > it to NEW and move onthere were 350+ bugs incorrectly set...you'll > see more moving to UNCONFIRMED if they were set incorrectly to begin > with. Sometimes I reported bugs and the bugs where set to "New" directly by the system, not by me. Don't know why the system decided the bug is confirmed and new ... Regards Robert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
@ Cor - if you'd like you can take a look yourself and move them to NEW if you believe they should be there, here are the bugs in REOPENED status that you are a commenter on: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=REOPENED&email1=cno%40nouenoff.nl&emaillongdesc1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=489142&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced Note that REOPENED should only be used if (1) the bug is assigned to a developer; (2) the bug was previously marked fixed by assigned developer; (3) you can reproduce the same issue on a later version after the assigned developer reported as FIXED. Any bug that doesn't meet the above criteria should be set to NEW (if confirmed of course, hopefully by a third party independent person...), or UNCONFIRMED (if not confirmed) Best, Joel On 11/04/2014 07:15 AM, Joel Madero wrote: > Yes because they were set to REOPENED incorrectly. REOPENED has a > specific definition and they were incorrectly there. Furthermore, some > of those bugs were "self confirmed" which we recommend against. That > being said, if a bug is confirmed and I set it to UNCONFIRMED just set > it to NEW and move onthere were 350+ bugs incorrectly set...you'll > see more moving to UNCONFIRMED if they were set incorrectly to begin > with. Also the comments that you points out didn't clearly confirm the > bugs that I asked. Anyways, expect more. > > > Best, > Joel > > > > On 11/04/2014 01:13 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: >> Hi Joel, >> >> Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 04:47: >> >>> So I just booted about 50 bugs over to UNCONFIRMED so that list has >>> jumped. I'm going through the rest of the list of about 280 more bugs - >> Sorry that I'm not fully aware of what's going on here, but I'm rather >> annoyed by the fact that bugs that I have spend precious time on in the >> past, to test and confirm, now are reset to unconfirmed... >> e.g. 35275, 35917, 35954, 83373. >> >> If the goal is that the issues are retested for some reason, then pls >> indicate that. Or do it yourself. >> >> Thanks! >> >> ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] retest ping to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 months
For now I'm not doing this just because there are so many other things to do and as of now I'm not seeing a clear message as to what we're doingI've seen at least 3-4 proposals with different links and the like. I suggest this be resolved on QA call, finalized, maybe a wiki written as to what the plan is, then we can move forward. Best, Joel On 11/03/2014 09:06 PM, Tommy wrote: > On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 06:49:35 +0100, Tommy wrote: > >> once 4.2.7 and 4.3.3 are now available, I think we could run the >> "please retest" automated message to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 >> months. >> >> actually there's 94 out of them. see list: >> http://snipurl.com/29eckcc >> >> >> let's see what's the feedback ratio and then decide if doing the same >> on older NEW bugs (excluding easy hacks as already discussed in the >> mailing list( >> > > or maybe we could ping older than 100 days bug from this list (193 bugs): > http://snipurl.com/29ejxgd > > > ___ > List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list > Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org > Change settings: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Yes because they were set to REOPENED incorrectly. REOPENED has a specific definition and they were incorrectly there. Furthermore, some of those bugs were "self confirmed" which we recommend against. That being said, if a bug is confirmed and I set it to UNCONFIRMED just set it to NEW and move onthere were 350+ bugs incorrectly set...you'll see more moving to UNCONFIRMED if they were set incorrectly to begin with. Also the comments that you points out didn't clearly confirm the bugs that I asked. Anyways, expect more. Best, Joel On 11/04/2014 01:13 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 04:47: > >> So I just booted about 50 bugs over to UNCONFIRMED so that list has >> jumped. I'm going through the rest of the list of about 280 more bugs - > > Sorry that I'm not fully aware of what's going on here, but I'm rather > annoyed by the fact that bugs that I have spend precious time on in the > past, to test and confirm, now are reset to unconfirmed... > e.g. 35275, 35917, 35954, 83373. > > If the goal is that the issues are retested for some reason, then pls > indicate that. Or do it yourself. > > Thanks! > > ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ... - correction ...
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 16:39 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > * Seattle Hackfest (Robinson/Norbert) ... > + badly need ways to stop 'building' consuming the hack-fest (Michael) > + or a way to keep hand-holding after the hack-fest (Bjoern) ... > + vast majority of people wanted access to VM > + monster communication problem with cloph ... > + Robinson was briefed on how to do that (cloph) > + Info emailed to hackfest devs (Robinson) > -> communication droppeded <- Incidentally it was just pointed out to me that "monster communication problem with cloph" could read as some hyper-criticism of him =) that's by no means the case - as (I hope) the context points out as we started to dig deeper there were probably several failures of communication / preparedness on the topic somewhere in the gap between cloph -> Robinson -> other mentors -> hack-fest attendees. My minuting, never perfect was much less than ideal here; sorry for that. We love you cloph ! =) ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@collabora.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Unconfirmed jump - sorry!
Hi Joel, Joel Madero wrote on 04-11-14 04:47: > So I just booted about 50 bugs over to UNCONFIRMED so that list has > jumped. I'm going through the rest of the list of about 280 more bugs - Sorry that I'm not fully aware of what's going on here, but I'm rather annoyed by the fact that bugs that I have spend precious time on in the past, to test and confirm, now are reset to unconfirmed... e.g. 35275, 35917, 35954, 83373. If the goal is that the issues are retested for some reason, then pls indicate that. Or do it yourself. Thanks! -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org - volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
