Re: [Libreoffice-qa] OpenBadges Type
sophi kirjoitti 8.3.2019 klo 15.56: Hi all, Following up with open badges structure, here is a list of contributions/skills I have identified: Report bugs Confirm bugs Comment bugs Bibisect Bisect Triage bugs Mentor people Report blogs item Write unit tests attended x meetings Participate to BHS Could you complete what I missed ? and when adding an item, add also the criteria in front of it (I've already done so for those in the list) Maybe Bisect could be dropped. Or do we want to have it for someone, who does their own build per commit? :) I know it is done sometimes, but perhaps not very often these days. Should we have more finegrained ones for unit tests? Like, "Write UI tests" / "Write cppunit tests" / "Write unit tests in Python"? As we are distinguishing Confirm from Triage, maybe we could have a third one "Improve report metadata" for those who like to tweak fields and categorise reports. Thanks for the thoughtful work. Ilmari ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] OpenBadges Type
Hi all, Following up with open badges structure, here is a list of contributions/skills I have identified: Report bugs Confirm bugs Comment bugs Bibisect Bisect Triage bugs Mentor people Report blogs item Write unit tests attended x meetings Participate to BHS Could you complete what I missed ? and when adding an item, add also the criteria in front of it (I've already done so for those in the list) Thanks a lot in advance, Cheers Sophie -- Sophie Gautier sophie.gaut...@documentfoundation.org GSM: +33683901545 IRC: sophi Release coordinator The Document Foundation ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Extending subsequent tests with dogtail tests?
Le 07/03/2019 à 19:32, Markus Mohrhard a écrit : > Most likely no. If we have tests for something it is more likely that it > will be fixed after it is discovered by in the end an accessibility > regression is similar to any other regression. That means that a test > started failing you are expected to inspect the test failure before > commiting but we will most likely not stop a release if a new test > discovers that something is broken. In general while we do much to avoid > regressions and having tests helps we don't treat regressions as > complete release blockers. There is always a case-by-case analysis > neccessary. Do you mean someone will break something in LibreOffice and will fix it in the future or do you mean someone break accessibility and Hypra has to fix it itself in the future ? In the last scenario, I don't see any reason to have non-regression test as we already know that people usually don't take care of accessibility and it's why we're forced to keep LibreOffice 4.2 for now. If we expect to have one developer fixing bug of thousand of others (on many free software) especially because it's accessibility I don't think it's reliable. Best regards, Alex. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
