Re: [Libreoffice-qa] tag for new features
On 18 December 2013 08:19, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose to developers that they open an issue for each new features or changes that need help file appended to it. In order to ease the search in BZ (the aim is to have documenters search for it and fix them), what would be the best flag to add to whiteboard status? Is NF for 'New Feature' something suitable? Thanks in advance Kind regards Sophie ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] subscribe
To subscribe, use http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] classifying bugs
Once you have reproduced a bug, we mark it as NEW so that it can, from there on, be passed on to the developers. 2013/5/29 José Guilherme Vanz guilherme@gmail.com Hello, Folks! I was trying testing and simulating some bugs there are in the bugzilla and a doubt appeared. When can we set bug status for confirmed? Who do it? Thank you -- Att. José Guilherme Vanz br.linkedin.com/pub/josé-guilherme-vanz/51/b27/58b/http://br.linkedin.com/pub/jos%C3%A9-guilherme-vanz/51/b27/58b/ O sofrimento é passageiro, desistir é para sempre - Bernardo Fonseca, recordista da Antarctic Ice Marathon. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA for GSoC project
I'd be willing to test on a Windows XP Machine for you. On 28 May 2013 15:43, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Cao Cuong Ngo cao.cuong@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been selected in GSoC this year, project Extend Support for Content Management Systems. I will implement the connection to Google Drive and properties/version dialog extension of CMIS. cool! It would be great if someone can volunteer and spend sometimes to help testing my future feature . When do you think that you'll be ready to provide builds to test? Please feel free to just ping the QA list if you need help testing something in particular during the summer :-) It would be helpful for you to ping the Documentation Team and chat about the best way to provide docs on how these new features work (or at least are *supposed* to work :-). That way when we test things in QA, we can refer to the documentation and make sure that the expected behavior and actual behavior are in agreement! Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test the Photo Album Creator
As far as the documentation team is concerned, the in-built help is useless. It is believed to be quite out-of-date and difficult to update. The docs team spend most of their time on the guides on ODFAuthors these days. On 16/05/2013, Samuel Mehrbrodt s.mehrbr...@gmail.com wrote: Am 13.05.2013 20:29, schrieb Andras Timar: I don't recall that Documentation folks have ever contributed anything to help, but I may be wrong. AFAIK they work on User Guides. Maybe we should just ask them whether they can do it. Shouldn't be too hard, if you wan write a little bit. I think that the Photo Album feature is pretty much self-explaining. A trivial UI reference help, such as Press the Create button to create the Photo Album or You can choose one from the three pre-defined layouts, 1 image per slide, 2 images per slide or 4 images per slide is not very useful. What help text did you think of? I can easily add a help page, if I'm provided with the text. Best regards, Andras Sure, it is self-explaining. But I still think a Help page would be helpful, at least it would help people who google for that feature to find it. Microsoft has a similiar page: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/powerpoint-help/create-and-share-a-photo-album-HA010338260.aspx Thanks Samuel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-users] Ask.LibreOffice.org and Bugzilla Twitter accounts
Great Idea (I've CC-ed QA because BugZilla is related to them) On 17 May 2013 12:27, Zeki Bildirici z...@ozgurlukicin.com wrote: Hi, You know social media is a very effective channel for getting people's attention. Also it can be used a regular reminder/ping'er/poke'r for communities. So using the social media's advantages to increase the community's attention on Ask.LibreOffice.org site and Bugzilla will be good imho. We had used this method in Pardus GNU/Linux and it worked. After asking to Florian for his advice that if is this possible to use this channels for LibreOffice, i've creaed two twitter accounts. The new accounts are: LibreOffice Bugzilla: https://twitter.com/LibreOfficeBugs Ask.LibreOffice.org: https://twitter.com/AskLibreOffice I've connected ask site's new question feeds and bugzilla's new bug's feeds to this accounts. The goals of having this accounts are: · To keep more attention on questions and bugs · Make community contribution process more social · To poke/ ping community’s members and asking for the minimum contribution that can give constantly · Spread the questions and bugs to their networks to find answers as soon as possible which will increase the possibility find the person whom has the answer · Make our ask and bugzilla more open to the community and increase the number of persons(not regular contributors) Well, there is also reasons under the “What current situation misses” questions · Having lots of bugzilla mails is not for ordinary community members, people does not want their inbox is filled with bug mails which most of them are not in interested. But twitter streams are different, it comes and passes through no rubbish left there. Trying to confirm a bug is generally a simple work to do, we can involve more people(other than the regular bugbusters) to have with this feeds. · Visiting ask site is not a practical exercise made every time, or getting feeds from Google Reader is not practiced by everyone, but most people use social media actively. This means more eyes will be on ask and bug sites constantly. · As said above, having constant attention for this sites are not possible for passive contributors · There is no chance to spread the questions through LibreOffice related networks. But with this accounts, the followers will generate a core LibreOffice network which will be feed through this accounts. I hope that this accounts will help to decrease the unanswered questions in the ask site(1.191 questions ~1/3 ) and activate more members to help triage bugs in bugzilla. If you have a twitter account please follow and promote/announce this accounts. Of course the most important thing is the interest of community and the will to became a part of this wonderful community to make LibreOffice the best free Office suite ever. Best regards, Zeki -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?
On 20 May 2013 19:06, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tommy Tommy wrote I'll try asking about the 3.6.6 Thanks! ;) Tommy wrote I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could be a valuable tool for QA guys. Just out of interest... how? It is indeed. Actually it seems that the developers of wPP are more in the Open Source spirit than the guys at PortableApps. Maybe TDF should buddy up What is meant by that? It seems that all PA.c installers are Open-Source, even if the apps (like Chrome or Skype) aren't. with the wPP also (or instead?) I'd say also - there are many people (myself included) who use PA.c often, and I would miss the builds linked to from there. With PA.c being as well-known as they are, especially with portable versions of software such as Skype and TweetDeck being released recently, people who, previously, have used OOo or AOO may start using LibO as it is the only other full office suite there, and it looks more updated than OOo portable, especially as it has support for saving in the new MSO formats, rather than just reading them, which is ultimately part of what swayed me towards LibO. OOo which is a version older than 3.4, which is obvious due to the different home menu. This was actually how I discovered LibO and I'm sure others have too. Tommy wrote IMHO it's much easier to deal with no-install packages rather than parallel installations. It is a double edged sword. On one hand it is indeed much easier. On the other hand since the packages need to be modified it is difficult to be sure if the observed behaviour is caused by LibreOffice or the hacks used to make it Portable... As Florian said the parallel install uses the same vanilla binaries and registry keys so it is less modified than a portable version. I agree - for testing of older versions, paralell / server is the way to go, but for people coming with questions about the portable version, I think an archive should be made available. But thanks to you I'm now a fan of X-LibreOffice :) BTW One very important detail: you can run as many X-LibreOffice versions simultaneously and at the same time as the standard install AND parallel installs. Goodbye PortableApps, Hello winPenPack :) I hope not - the LibO Devs (I'm assuming they do it seeing as it's hosted on the LibO site, not sourceforge) seem to be portablising it pretty much in time with the main production, as updates come through on the menu very almost as often as the main app. I hope that, in the end, we stick with PA.c, but also help out WPP, as -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Portable-vs-Parallel-which-one-is-better-tp4056781p4057055.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Portable vs Parallel: which one is better?
Actually, they are: they even supply apps to help with the process see http://portableapps.com/development all the instructions are there, along with example code On 20 May 2013 19:17, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kieran Kieran Peckett wrote Seeing as the Portable Version is hosted at LibreOffice rather than SourceForge, I assume LibO devs pack it up. If that is true, then can't someone, at least for future versions, if older versions can't be found in anyone's Downloads folder keep archives of non-EOL versions (like = 3.5) around? The Portable builds are hosted at LibreOffice but they are created by the PortableApps owner. There are no instructions available to create such a version (I offered to help in creating the missing versions but never got any answer http://portableapps.com/node/35110) The existing versions are all stored in LibreOffice's server. The only problem is that as soon as a new branch is released they abandon the previous branch, so there is no final version for each branch. Luckily, the guys at winPenPack think differently :) (two pence are much more than 2 cents :) ) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Portable-vs-Parallel-which-one-is-better-tp4056781p4057058.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New text for NEEDINFO Changes
Something shorter and easier to understand that might work - you don't have to use this if you want, I'm just making ideas. It has been 180 days (6 months) since we asked you for more information about this bug. We will be waiting for information a further 30 days (1 month) before closing this bug. For more information, go to: [link goes here] Hope this can help as something to base ideas off. On 22 April 2013 00:26, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Joel, all jmadero wrote On 04/21/2013 10:45 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: this text IMHO is much too elaborated and prim, please do not use it. After long discussions and email threads it seems like *most* people agree that NEEDINFO should be a temporary status Users have some responsibility to help us help them ;) I agree with the three sentences above :) Your nice message has too much information ;) And I agree that 6 months (plus 1 month) is more than enough time to wait for further details. Emptying the queue from the QA side is stimulating for both QA and users (they see something is being done). It should also be stimulating for developers who can see the list of things to-do growing shorter instead of being a never ending, always increasing huge list of items to be solved... Just my 2 or 3 cents ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-New-text-for-NEEDINFO-Changes-tp4051386p4051433.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] XP Tester Needed for Several Bugs
On 15 April 2013 23:12, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kieran Kieran Peckett wrote On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only? Are you crazyskeggy in Bugzilla? Yes, I am I reopened Bug #62089 because I can replicate the bug if I replicate the submitter's conditions i.e. switch to Windows Classis style under Windows XP. Cheers, Pedro OK. I forgot to CC myself on that bug so thanks for the message. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-XP-Tester-Needed-for-Several-Bugs-tp4050138p4050172.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Team Email
What would that e-mail do? I'm new to the team so haven't been in on any
discussions about it.
On Friday, 12 April 2013, Joel Madero wrote:
Unless there are complaints by Monday, QA team is going to request the
following email -- QA-Admin@ -- from TDF, we understand that it's a
tentative email and can be revoked at any time but feel like having a team
email that we can do things like mass close bugs on FDO is a good thing for
many reasons including:
1) Same email can be used for every mass change on fdo
2) For people CC'ed on bugs, they *may* be able to auto filter emails from
FDO if it's generated by a change done by this admin account
3) Professional to have an admin email
4) Will somewhat protect our QA team from complaints from users when we do
these mass changes, although we want to address as many complaints as
possible, it's not the responsibility of a single user to be blamed for a
QA team decision (such as closing bugs)
If there is an issue with this please let me know no later than Monday,
else I am going to request it and move forward with some of our FDO
projects.
Best,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'jmadero@gmail.com');
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice help update?
The guides do get updated - the 4.0 guides are being written now and the getting started ones are already done. http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/documentation/ On Sunday, 7 April 2013, mariosv wrote: Hi all, sometimes, trying to help other users, I like to give them the reference where to find in the help about what are they looking for, etc.?. And always I can, I recommended to have a quick read of the help to know what is there, specially with new user. But with more enhancements introduced, I begun to find that this is no possible, because the help is not updated. Why is I have done an analysis about what enhancements, detailed in 4.0 New Features page (https://www.libreoffice.org/download/4-0-new-features-and-fixes), have been updated in the help. And unfortunately, the results are what I was afraid. nabble_a The analysis is tabulate in the joined spreadsheet. lt;nabble_a href=quot;QA_Analysis_New_4-0_Features_in_LibreOffice_Help.odsquot;QA_Analysis_New_4-0_Features_in_LibreOffice_Help.ods IMVHO, the enhancements, should not be in final release without the help properly updated. Because if the help is not the reference, where is the reference?. How can no one to know what is there?. Is it right? we all trying to know how the new announced enhancements works. How can we know when there is a bug or is the expected result? How can we do an QA test without know in detail the enhancement?. Why not mandatory to introduce the enhancements, update the help? So again IMVHO what is not in help is like it does not exist in program. I think I have read time ago in the net, about how difficult is maintain the help system. But if this is not done then I think we are going to nowhere. I hope some progress can be done here. Regards. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-help-update-tp4048388.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org javascript:; Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] talkyoo issues
Just a note about G+, aren't hangouts limited to ten (10) people? See https://support.google.com/plus/answer/1215273?hl=en-GBref_topic=1257349 - it mentions with up to 9 people. On Friday, 29 March 2013, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Petr If you need some help admining things im more than happy to help. I have an idea of how this VoIP stuff works. -Original Message- From: Petr Mladek [mailto:pmla...@suse.cz javascript:;] Sent: 29 March 2013 13:22 To: Florian Effenberger Cc: Jonathan Aquilina; 'Reisinger'; 'libreoffice-dev'; 'Libreoffice-qa'; 'Bjoern Michaelsen'; 'Christian Lohmaier'; bishop.robin...@gmail.comjavascript:;; 'Joren' Subject: Re: talkyoo issues Florian Effenberger píše v Pá 29. 03. 2013 v 11:55 +0100: Hi, Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-03-29 11:48: Quick Google turned up this http://www.voipvoip.com/virtual-phone-number/germany.html is this what we would want? no. As said on IRC: You can receive 2 concurrent calls with your international virtual phone number That doesn't work for us... Just for record. We are going to do some more testing with talkyoo the following week. It seems to be working for other teams, so there must be a problem how we used it in the QA call. IMHO, we should use normal phone to open the line. Also we should use normal phone in countries where the free phone number is available. BTW: I personally have newer had problems to open the line or join the call operated by talkyoo. Also the sound was always very good even when I used skype. I think that we just need to invest some effort into debugging the problems that others have. It is great that we got contact to Christian and Florian who have mor experience with it and could help. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org javascript:; Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test from PHP
It worked On 19 Mar 2013 09:00, programm...@ertai.nl wrote: test from PHP ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Hard Hacks Wikipage
Is it okay to remove the HARD HACKS ARE CURRENTLY ON HOLD UNTIL RELEASE OF 4.0. message from HardHacks on the TDF wiki? I am assuming so but I wasn't sure if we were waiting until 4.0.1 to go stable, even though 4.0.0 is already released. (If this is a decision to be made by the developers instead of QA, can someone forward this their way please? ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Intro to me
Thanks!
I already have the Server GUI installed, as I needed it to install the
4.0.0.1 rc for the docs team.
This wasn't too much of a takeoff, and I knew most of how to do QA-ing from
my time as a Mozilla volunteer.
On Saturday, 2 March 2013, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Hi,
I want to give you a warm welcome to the QA team
Please keep in mind, that QA is something like a never-ending story
So a few things right at the beginning:
1) We have a QA channel at freenode (#libreoffice-qa)
2) we have a biweekly call on friday
3) You may start with 4.0 bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedbug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=REOPENEDversion=4.0.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Masterversion=4.0.0.0.alpha1version=4.0.0.0.beta1version=4.1.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Masterversion=4.0.0.0.beta2version=4.0.0.1%20rcversion=4.0.0.2%20rcversion=4.0.0.3%20releaseversion=4.0.1.1%20rcversion=4.0.1.2%20rcproduct=LibreOfficelist_id=245941
If you are on Windows, you might want to have a look at this:
http://reisi007.bplaced.com/program/
Don't hesitate to ask if you need help...
If you triage a bug, please insert yourself into the QA contact field...
(I hope, that this wasn't too much for the takeoff at QA :)
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
Am 02.03.2013 um 17:30 schrieb Kieran Peckett
crazyske...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'crazyske...@gmail.com');
:
Hi.
I am Kieran, and I have been active at lo-documentation and lo-users for a
month or two now, and have now decided to join QA, as I feel that won't
take up too much more. I am posting this as an introduction to myself so
that you all know who I am and don't wonder who is this guy whenever I
post.
I have already posted a couple of bugs at FDO and have done a bit of
triaging today as well. I did do a bit of QA-ing at Mozilla a few months
ago on bugzilla, but after having stopped using their products I found it
to be a bit boring, so a few months later I took a look at the LO Get
Involved page, and as I've said, joined the Docs team and have decided to
branch out slightly more.
One note I would like to make, though - the page on the LO website only
mentions the developers mailing list, whilst the TDF wikipage also mentions
this one - a correction could be made there so that they don't have to
subscribe to a second list, or think is this the same one? and end up not
subscribing to here as well. Maybe list both at LO, and maybe just this one
at TDFwiki? If this was intentional by you, then don't worry about it, I
was just thinking that new users may get a bit confused by 2 links in 2
different places.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org');
Change settings:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
