Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Possibility of monitoring LibreOffice code with SonarQube

[Pasqual Milvaques]

The coverity scan actually is done with gcov/lcov and is quite useful as
you say, SonarQube can do code coverage analysis also by importing gcov
info (http://docs.sonarqube.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=531) so at
the end it would present the same data with another gui but it's not clear
if this could more useful than the current UI.
The interesting apportation is that SonarQube can give more information
about other aspects of the project code quality, all the features are
summarized here:
http://www.sonarsource.com/products/features/

The performace impact would be taken in nemo.sonarqube.org as to use this
by free (as in beer) we must use that public instance of the software, c++
plugin is propietary and has an economic cost, as LibreOffice is an open
source project there is the option to use this server by free. The
maintainers of the software indicate that for adding it only has to be
requested it in the forum, a condition to add it is that the project must
be easy to build. In the current state of LibreOffice code I think that
this is true but perhaps they have some argument about it

I''m going to ask for this

Thanks

2016-04-12 16:33 GMT+02:00 V Stuart Foote :

> Sure, but do you mean in addition to the very functional Coverity Scan that
> the project already routinely uses?
>
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/libreoffice
>
> Is that just a "belt + suspenders" idea, or is there really substantive
> advantage to flushing the code base through another quality check?  And,
> whom would you suggest would host it and take the performance hit on their
> build system?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Possibility-of-monitoring-LibreOffice-code-with-SonarQube-tp4180936p4180953.html
> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems?
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Possibility of monitoring LibreOffice code with SonarQube

[Pasqual Milvaques]

Hello

SonarQube is very nice tool used for continuous inspection of code quality,
it's core is open source but the support for some languages (c++, for
example) and some features are closed source.

That makes using it for LibreOffice in a private instance not
straightforward, anyway the maintainers of the product had set up a public
server for use for open source projects, it's located here:
https://nemo.sonarqube.org/

If you think that can be interesting to have some monitoring of LibreOffice
code in nemo.sonarqube.org I can try to contact the sonar maintainers to
try to do a setup for monitoring the LibreOffice code

What do you think about it?

Thanks :)
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/