Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Moztrap evaluation online - roles and permissions
Yifan Jiang píše v St 23. 05. 2012 v 10:53 +0800: > At the moment, the test suites are divided into different priorities (P1, P2, > P3, P4), accordingly we can create test runs based on the priority: > > - For Full Regression Test of a major version is to include all priority > of cases to a test run. > > - For Regression Test of a bug fix minor version is to include high (P1 > and P2) priority of cases to a test run. > > Those were what we did in Litmus era. The proposal of what test scenario belongs to what priority is described at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Test_Cases_Organization#Priority Just to explain some more background :-) Litmus allows to split test cases in two levels: "test group" and "subgroup". We used "test groups" to split by component, e.g. Writer, Calc. We used subgroup to split by priority, e.g. P1, P2. Moztrap has only one level called "Test Suites". It allows to run only the whole "test suite". We might want to run only "P1" and maybe "P2" tests for bugfix releases => Yifan had the great idea to split test suites by priorities. Note that Moztrap allows to add any tag for each test case. We could use the tags for marking component-specific bugs. It is easy. Test cases authors just select from list of available tags that is provided by administrator. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Moztrap evaluation online - roles and permissions
Hi Nino, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 07:38:21PM +0200, Nino wrote: > Hi again, > > Could you please grant me a test creator role, I want to try out > entering test cases. Of course, done! If no special reasons, please add the cases to "Version 0", it will automatically apply to later versions of the case if "And Later Versions" checkbox is checked on. The creator only allows an increased operation of the test base, but do not worry about messing up things when you try to play them :) > BTW: Do we have a higher level test plan or test strategy? Which > e.g. states what has to be tested for which purpose / in which > situation? I'm wondering if/how some kind of mapping could be > achieved between a requirement/use case/spec, a (or several) program > function(s), and a set of corresponding test cases. Great question! It is about how we organize the testing. The full strategy and planning is evolving and I don't think we have a definite tone here :) Though we have some tenative thoughts. The current plan, from Litmus experience, is to have a stable test case base, which we put into different "test suites". Test suites are allowed to include to a "test run". And the test run is what a tester usually see from the Run Tests view. At the moment, the test suites are divided into different priorities (P1, P2, P3, P4), accordingly we can create test runs based on the priority: - For Full Regression Test of a major version is to include all priority of cases to a test run. - For Regression Test of a bug fix minor version is to include high (P1 and P2) priority of cases to a test run. Those were what we did in Litmus era. The good thing of Moztrap is the test suite and case management is more clear and flexible, we can always create special test suites on demand, including a particular set of test cases. Then we can create a particular test run from those test suites. BTW, you will need to setup a local moztrap instance, or to be a "Manager" permission to play with all of these management stuff :) -- Yifan Jiang Libreoffice / SuSE Contact: yifan - irc.freenode.net/libreoffice = http://www.libreoffice.org/ http://www.documentfoundation.org/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Moztrap evaluation online - roles and permissions
Hi again, Could you please grant me a test creator role, I want to try out entering test cases. BTW: Do we have a higher level test plan or test strategy? Which e.g. states what has to be tested for which purpose / in which situation? I'm wondering if/how some kind of mapping could be achieved between a requirement/use case/spec, a (or several) program function(s), and a set of corresponding test cases. Nino ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Moztrap evaluation online - roles and permissions
Dear fellows, This mail is part of the main thread of Moztrap evaluation online. By default, Moztrap allows Guest touring of the system. Without any registration, anyone can review testing result and how they organized. For practical evaluation of the system, you should have either of the following roles. Tester role === Natively Moztrap supports either Mozilla Persona ID or traditional registered way of log in. Since using and hacking to support those method or OpenID solution is still pending, we only enabled the traditional way at the moment. After a successful registration, you will be automatically assigned as a tester, namely you could run test cases when the id is born :) Test creator role = If you have test cases on hand and want to contribute the test case base, please do not hesitate to let me know :) In addition, as the format of test case, I feel it would be convenient to follow the Moztrap "Bulk test case" entry rule, that a text based test case can be stored and exchanged conveniently. More details of how it works can be found: http://readthedocs.org/docs/moztrap/en/1.0.X/userguide/ui/import.html#bulk-test-case-entry-formats Admin role == Admins could organize test runs, test cases organizations etc. Litmus admins, please let me know when registered, I'll assign corresponding admin permission for you. If some one out of Litmus admin team who wants to try the test case management tasks, please show off your previously proven contribution to Libreoffice project. Admins would evaluate and decide the granting of permission. Best wishes, Yifan ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
