Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
V Stuart Foote wrote: > But with TB-42 hung, can't tell at the moment. > Box rebooted w/o apparent reason. Heh, Windows. ;) Builds again now. -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
I just downloaded and did a /A administrative install of the same 4.2.0beta2+ build onto Windows XP sp3 (as a VMWare guest OS on WIndows 7 sp1, 64-bit). Version: 4.2.0.0.beta2+ Build ID: 02180aed7dc0b8c5f9cc23b319adc2386a9aab69 TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:libreoffice-4-2, Time: 2013-12-08_08:48:31 So it comes up clean and fully functional, so not exactly the issue of fdo#72451 as affecting builds of master. Installer handled the configuration variables correctly on XP. Hmm, weird! Shame there are no symbols for the 4.2 beta or you could use WinDbg, or its dbghelp.dll with ProcessMonitor to review the faulting calls. ProcessMonitor might still be helpful--but probably best to wait 'til the next TB-42 build to see if it is still throwing the fatal error on your install. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4087618.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
@Pedro, I suspect that was the fdo#72451 <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72451> issue (clobbered builds from the 7th - 10th) already corrected on master and also should be fixed on the 4.2 branch. But with TB-42 hung, can't tell at the moment. Gave Thorsten a nudge last night. Hopefully we'll have a 4.2.0beta2+ build to check against soon. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4087602.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Christian, all Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote >> Thank you for adding the 4.2 branch. In fact TB#42 is currently the only >> one >> producing dailies for that branch. > > The TDF labeled Jones will follow shortly, I need to tweak the build > scripts to work with multiple branches. Ping :) It would be nice to have TDF daily builds on the 4.2 branch to test features/detect bugs (otherwise we reach the RC stage and the answer is "Too late"...) For some reason today's daily build from TB#42 (libo-42~2013-12-08_08.48.31_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.beta2_Win_x86.msi) won't even start under Win XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US with the following message <http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4087367/Screenshot_2013-12-09_12.03.36.png> Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4087367.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Norbert Thiebaud wrote > that is what bibisect repo are for. > downloading 100 to 200MB per iteration is not a nice solution for anyone. > bibsect repo are bigger to start with.. so the initial setup is > slower... but after that the bisection can be done completely offline > I do not have data for windows.. but for mac, I'm putting the > finishing touch to a bibisect repo for the 4-2 series... which contain > so far 2559 builds for 5GB. Hi! I rechecked your post in http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-bibisect-fro-windows-tp4002219.html, so is it possible to relaunch your project anytime soon? Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4086007.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:00 PM, bfoman wrote: > Hi! > Apart from availability of daily builds is it possible to increase the > storage space available for tinderbox builds? Seems currently only 14 latest > builds of each branch are available (when all works like expected). This > doesn't allow to think about building any regression/bisect script/tool > (based on SI-GUI?) for Windows, which would download a build, install it, > ask a question, save answer, download earlier build if needed etc. that is what bibisect repo are for. downloading 100 to 200MB per iteration is not a nice solution for anyone. bibsect repo are bigger to start with.. so the initial setup is slower... but after that the bisection can be done completely offline I do not have data for windows.. but for mac, I'm putting the finishing touch to a bibisect repo for the 4-2 series... which contain so far 2559 builds for 5GB. iow such nice gui wrapper should really use a bibisect repo under the cover rather than downloading daily builds... of course windows pose 'special' challenge... a bibisect repo for windows should not accumulate msi fiels as they do not lend themself well to compression in git but SI-GUI could probably be tauch to use a 'pre-installed' version... doing wahtever tweak windows need in the cover to fake a 'real' install when one switch from one version to the other in the bibisect repo Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi! Apart from availability of daily builds is it possible to increase the storage space available for tinderbox builds? Seems currently only 14 latest builds of each branch are available (when all works like expected). This doesn't allow to think about building any regression/bisect script/tool (based on SI-GUI?) for Windows, which would download a build, install it, ask a question, save answer, download earlier build if needed etc. This would allow to get more people without technical knowledge into regression testing if few simple steps. Latest poll results are very encouraging, people are willing to help. Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4085992.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Christian, all Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > The TDF labeled ones will follow shortly, I need to tweak the build > scripts to work with multiple branches. Excellent. I will wait for those then. I think I will ignore the 4.3 branch for now (until 4.2.0 RC1 is out, at least) and stick with 4.2 dailies. Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > Yes, all the TDF bots build with the release set of features, except that > the builds are en-us only and identify as lo-dev. > They aim to be as close to the public builds as possible. My understanding now is that people should use the TDF daily builds (e.g. from tinderbox #47 for the Windows OS). If the TDF builds fail, ping the Tinderbox owner :) Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4085897.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Pedro, *, Am 27.11.2013 13:48 schrieb "Pedro" > > > Thank you for adding the 4.2 branch. In fact TB#42 is currently the only one > producing dailies for that branch. The TDF labeled Jones will follow shortly, I need to tweak the build scripts to work with multiple branches. > It would be nice if there was some explanation from the devs as to what is > the goal of each Tinderbox. E.g. Tinderbox #47 produces an installer and an > offline help similar to the final one except that it only included en_US > (therefore the installer is 132Mb in size) Yes, all the TDF bots build with the release set of features, except that the builds are en-us only and identify as lo-dev. They aim to be as close to the public builds as possible. Ciao Christian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Pedro wrote: > On a separate note: TB#42 is creating folders for the 4.1 branch but no > files are being uploaded. > Yup, that came up separately - seems the script got broken after the changes to instdir in master. > Thorsten Behrens wrote > >> 3) Build names for the TB #42 Master branch are still different from the > >> other TBs > >> > > Let me attempt to fix that, too. > > Ping :) > Drats. So I will actually have to go & read the code where that name comes from. ;) Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Thorsten Thorsten Behrens wrote >> 2) TB #39 and #42 are building Master builds for the upcoming 4.3 branch >> (as >> expected) but there are no 4.2 branch daily builds >> > Good point, let me add that. Thank you for adding the 4.2 branch. In fact TB#42 is currently the only one producing dailies for that branch. Could you please adjust the file naming from libo-42 to libreoffice-4-2 ? On a separate note: TB#42 is creating folders for the 4.1 branch but no files are being uploaded. Thorsten Behrens wrote >> 3) Build names for the TB #42 Master branch are still different from the >> other TBs >> > Let me attempt to fix that, too. Ping :) It would be nice if there was some explanation from the devs as to what is the goal of each Tinderbox. E.g. Tinderbox #47 produces an installer and an offline help similar to the final one except that it only included en_US (therefore the installer is 132Mb in size) However the Master builds for TB#39 and TB#42 are 125Mb and 121Mb respectively What was removed? What are the goals of this builds? Using this build instead of #47 allows to prove/test something? Thanks, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4085219.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
V Stuart Foote wrote: > But would you also be able to tweak the build to include the "--enable-ia2" > configuration so we'll be able to work on the experimental IAccessible2 > support for Assistive Technology tools? > Hah, good point - thx, enabled for the next upload. Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Thorsten, Thorsten Behrens wrote >> 2) TB #39 and #42 are building Master builds for the upcoming 4.3 branch >> (as >> expected) but there are no 4.2 branch daily builds >> > Good point, let me add that. We look to now have a viable LODev 4.2.0.0beta1+ build running on TB-42. Thanks! http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-2/Win-x86@42/ But would you also be able to tweak the build to include the "--enable-ia2" configuration so we'll be able to work on the experimental IAccessible2 support for Assistive Technology tools? Regards, Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4084873.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Pedro wrote: > State of daily Master builds (for Windows) on the 22nd of November 2013: > Thx for the overview! > Comments: > > 1) Tinderbox (alias TB) #39 and #42 don't provide the needed txt > file > Seems to be related to the different tinderbox scripts (both use buildbot/tb/tb). Currently lack the cycles to have a deeper look, maybe someone else could port that over from tb2? > 2) TB #39 and #42 are building Master builds for the upcoming 4.3 branch (as > expected) but there are no 4.2 branch daily builds > Good point, let me add that. > 3) Build names for TB #42 are still different from the other TBs > Let me attempt to fix that, too. Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Stuart V Stuart Foote wrote > Text file is not "needed"! It is just convenient ;-) > > It is trivial to view the details of the TB builds of Master -- > http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html just match the > time-stamp of the build to the "buld time" collumn and side across to the > collumn for the TB your reviewing. The bottom of the corresponding block > is the start of the build, and build logs are porvided in the details. > Those are the exact details as get parsed for the "text" file. > > The details you shuld be interested in are the configuration line, to > determine what features are included in the build, and SHA-1 HASH ID of > the last commit included in the build, and maybe who is managing the TB -- > should you need to poke them. That is partly true :) If you have downloaded a binary from one of the TB and you don't have the txt file, how do you know from which TB it came from? I know there is always a workaround. But isn't it easier to just have the computer generate a simple txt file? If this functionality already exists (and works as expected, as proven by TB #47) isn't it possible to adopt this as a default procedure for all TBs? V Stuart Foote wrote > And functionally, for todays builds of master TB-39 has the --enable-ia2 > build flag for IAccessible2 AT support, TB-42 and TB-47 do not. Ok. But what is the difference between 42 and 47? Also, what should people test in IA2? Is it on by default? Is there a hidden switch to turn it on? This brings me back to the question: which build should users download? Is testing IA2 important or are there features in the builds from the other TBs that are more crucial/urgent to test? Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4084488.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Pedro, Text file is not "needed"! It is just convenient ;-) It is trivial to view the details of the TB builds of Master -- http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/MASTER/status.html just match the time-stamp of the build to the "buld time" collumn and side across to the collumn for the TB your reviewing. The bottom of the corresponding block is the start of the build, and build logs are porvided in the details. Those are the exact details as get parsed for the "text" file. The details you shuld be interested in are the configuration line, to determine what features are included in the build, and SHA-1 HASH ID of the last commit included in the build, and maybe who is managing the TB -- should you need to poke them. Review the commits here--setting repository to master or one of the branches--change from "log msg" to "range" and enter the SHA-1 HASH for the build ID (its last included commit): http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/ Also, since we just split the 4.2.0beta branch off from master--so there is a brand new 4.2 Tinderbox Status -- http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/libreoffice-4-2/status.html but no TBs have been assigned/spun up there yet. Todays builds are all still against master and are found in that status. But that will change near term. Same layout and review of the build logs here. And functionally, for todays builds of master TB-39 has the --enable-ia2 build flag for IAccessible2 AT support, TB-42 and TB-47 do not. Stuart From: libreoffice-qa-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org on behalf of Pedro Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 9:30 AM To: libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds Hi all State of daily Master builds (for Windows) on the 22nd of November 2013: #39 master~2013-11-22_07.08.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi 22-Nov-2013 08:17 125M no txt file #42 libo-master~2013-11-22_08.47.24_LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi 22-Nov-2013 11:07 121M no txt file #47 master~2013-11-17_23.56.08_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86.msi 18-Nov-2013 02:26 132M txt file AND helppack en_US (well done!) Comments: 1) Tinderbox (alias TB) #39 and #42 don't provide the needed txt file 2) TB #39 and #42 are building Master builds for the upcoming 4.3 branch (as expected) but there are no 4.2 branch daily builds 3) Build names for TB #42 are still different from the other TBs 4) TB #47 stopped producing daily builds on the 17th of November Questions: Is there any document which explains what are the differences between these three installers? Which one should people select? Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4084478.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi all State of daily Master builds (for Windows) on the 22nd of November 2013: #39 master~2013-11-22_07.08.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi 22-Nov-2013 08:17 125M no txt file #42 libo-master~2013-11-22_08.47.24_LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi 22-Nov-2013 11:07 121M no txt file #47 master~2013-11-17_23.56.08_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86.msi 18-Nov-2013 02:26 132M txt file AND helppack en_US (well done!) Comments: 1) Tinderbox (alias TB) #39 and #42 don't provide the needed txt file 2) TB #39 and #42 are building Master builds for the upcoming 4.3 branch (as expected) but there are no 4.2 branch daily builds 3) Build names for TB #42 are still different from the other TBs 4) TB #47 stopped producing daily builds on the 17th of November Questions: Is there any document which explains what are the differences between these three installers? Which one should people select? Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Tinderbox-builds-tp4083345p4084478.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Behrens píše v So 16. 11. 2013 v 02:19 +0100: > Uploading now finally. Kendy, Cloph, if your bots are using tb, > another git pull might be needed for you. Thanks so much - pulled & restarted on @39 now. Regards, Kendy ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Good morning Christian, *, On Samstag, 16. November 2013 17:29 Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Thomas Hackert > wrote: >> On Freitag, 15. November 2013 20:39 Christian Lohmaier wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Thomas Hackert >>> wrote: is this also the reason, why TB 46 still does not build new dailies? >>> >>> "this" is nothing the thread mentions, so "no" :-) >> >> pardon? I seem not to understand your "nothing the thread >> mentions" > > Don't mind it. That was just nitpicking about language/the > citation style. Use of "this" to refer to something where it is > totally unstated what "this" is. ah, O.K. > You quoted parts that were about why builds from one bot were > larger than others/different configure flags used, and what > configure flags are used have nothing to do with the uploading > problem. Again: Just nitpicking. Tried to make that clear with the > smily, but failed, Just forgot that I wrote it :-) O.K. >> ... :( Do you mean, that this thread is not about TB 46 or >> something else? > > That when you tell somebody: "Have I already told you about > this?", then the other person needs to have a clue what you mean > with "this" before that person can give an answer. O.K. > So yes, this thread is about some tinderboxes not providing > dailies, and yes, all should have been fixed. O.K. Thank you for your explanation Thomas. -- The Briggs-Chase Law of Program Development: To determine how long it will take to write and debug a program, take your best estimate, multiply that by two, add one, and convert to the next higher units. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Thomas, On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Thomas Hackert wrote: > On Freitag, 15. November 2013 20:39 Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Thomas Hackert >> wrote: >>> >>> is this also the reason, why TB 46 still does not build new >>> dailies? >> >> "this" is nothing the thread mentions, so "no" :-) > > pardon? I seem not to understand your "nothing the thread mentions" Don't mind it. That was just nitpicking about language/the citation style. Use of "this" to refer to something where it is totally unstated what "this" is. You quoted parts that were about why builds from one bot were larger than others/different configure flags used, and what configure flags are used have nothing to do with the uploading problem. Again: Just nitpicking. Tried to make that clear with the smily, but failed, Just forgot that I wrote it :-) > ... :( Do you mean, that this thread is not about TB 46 or something else? That when you tell somebody: "Have I already told you about this?", then the other person needs to have a clue what you mean with "this" before that person can give an answer. So yes, this thread is about some tinderboxes not providing dailies, and yes, all should have been fixed. ciao Christian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Thorsten, On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> So my guess it is the extension integration, the bundling of the >> dictionaries, the enabling of the mozab connector (that then also >> bundles additional microsoft-runtimes) Yes, indeed that is the case. While the TDF-bots use the --with-distro switch the @42 one uses a minimalistic configure line. That explains the difference in size. Not necessarily a bad thing to have bots build with different switches, so the below statement: >> @thorsten - bug in the tinderbox scripts? was not related to the different options, but that the bot did only send empty logs to tinderbox and didn't provide any info on its configure switches with the uploaded binaries. >> > If anything, then the setup. Someone throw me over a autogen.input to > use, and I stick it in. ;) Oh, not about you should switch to some other flags, just that your bot doesn't upload the build-info along with the binaries (configure options/configure output) and also the logs on tinderbox are empty. They only contain the metadata and the tinderboxprint statment that specifies the revision that was built, but no actual console output of the builds. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@42/2013-11-16_00.17.12/ or empty buildlogs like this: http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&full-log=1384557601.3379 So buildresults now have been fixed, recent builds actually have a log, but there is no build-info snippet uploaded along with the msis. ciao Christian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Good morning Christian, *, On Freitag, 15. November 2013 20:39 Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Thomas Hackert > wrote: >> >> is this also the reason, why TB 46 still does not build new >> dailies? > > "this" is nothing the thread mentions, so "no" :-) pardon? I seem not to understand your "nothing the thread mentions" ... :( Do you mean, that this thread is not about TB 46 or something else? > But there have been changes in the buildsystem, where I had the > fix applied, but in all the wisdom to the wrong copy of the file. Oh ... :( > Shame on me. Nothing to shame. Could happen to everyone of us ... ;) > So really fixed. Thank you very much :) Have a nice day Thomas. -- It looks like it's up to me to save our skins. Get into that garbage chute, flyboy! -- Princess Leia Organa ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
I wrote: > Robinson Tryon wrote: > > > Other boxes don't seem to have resolved. There is no latest build in tb-42 > > > or tb-39. > > > > Confirmed. CC'ing kendy (owner: tb-39) and thorsten (owner: tb-42). > > > Yup. Some residual sillyness in the fallback code for older source > versions. On it, test build is running. > Uploading now finally. Kendy, Cloph, if your bots are using tb, another git pull might be needed for you. Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Christian Lohmaier wrote: > So my guess it is the extension integration, the bundling of the > dictionaries, the enabling of the mozab connector (that then also > bundles additional microsoft-runtimes) > > @thorsten - bug in the tinderbox scripts? > If anything, then the setup. Someone throw me over a autogen.input to use, and I stick it in. ;) Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Thomas, *, On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Thomas Hackert wrote: > > is this also the reason, why TB 46 still does not build new dailies? "this" is nothing the thread mentions, so "no" :-) But there have been changes in the buildsystem, where I had the fix applied, but in all the wisdom to the wrong copy of the file. Shame on me. So really fixed. ciao Christian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hello Christian, *, On Freitag, 15. November 2013 19:36 Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Robinson Tryon > wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Roopesh Kohad >> wrote: >>> I am unblocked with latest build today morning on tb-47 here >>> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@47-TDF/current/ >> >>> The size of latest build on tb-47 as compared to earlier builds >>> from tb-42 seem to significantly higher (130 MB vs 119MB) and it >>> also asked for "restart" on installation. Is installer for tb-47 >>> different than others? > > Hmm. Not sure why it asks for restart, OTOH I don't install LO all > that often on windows myself... > > It probably differes, as it uses the release-style build > configuration - it has every feature enabled that is also enabled > for the release builds (except for the languages) not sure what > @42 uses, as it uploads empty logs, doesn't upload the build-info > snippet, and doesn't have any special info on the tinderbox > page... > > So my guess it is the extension integration, the bundling of the > dictionaries, the enabling of the mozab connector (that then also > bundles additional microsoft-runtimes) is this also the reason, why TB 46 still does not build new dailies? Could have a look at it as well, please? Thank you in advance and have a nice evening Thomas. -- "[W]hen the policy you are adopting is worse for everybody than a policy you agree is stupid, the policy you are adopting is best characterized as really stupid." -- Brad DeLong (2009) ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Hi Robinson, *, On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > [was Re: Libreoffice-qa Digest, Vol 29, Issue 27] > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Roopesh Kohad > wrote: >> I am unblocked with latest build today morning on tb-47 here >> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@47-TDF/current/ > >> The size of latest build on tb-47 as compared to earlier builds from tb-42 >> seem to significantly higher (130 MB vs 119MB) and it also asked for >> "restart" on installation. Is installer for tb-47 different than others? Hmm. Not sure why it asks for restart, OTOH I don't install LO all that often on windows myself... It probably differes, as it uses the release-style build configuration - it has every feature enabled that is also enabled for the release builds (except for the languages) not sure what @42 uses, as it uploads empty logs, doesn't upload the build-info snippet, and doesn't have any special info on the tinderbox page... So my guess it is the extension integration, the bundling of the dictionaries, the enabling of the mozab connector (that then also bundles additional microsoft-runtimes) @thorsten - bug in the tinderbox scripts? >> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Windows-x86@47-TDF, its empty >> and a distraction. > > CC'ing Cloph (owner: tb-47) for this one. Yeah, will also have to rename the Mac-TDF one, as I forgot to add it to the wiki page and in the meantime some other bot took #48 :-) (No problem for tinderbox, as tinderbox doesn't care about those IDs) ciao Christian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
Robinson Tryon wrote: > > Other boxes don't seem to have resolved. There is no latest build in tb-42 > > or tb-39. > > Confirmed. CC'ing kendy (owner: tb-39) and thorsten (owner: tb-42). > Yup. Some residual sillyness in the fallback code for older source versions. On it, test build is running. Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Tinderbox builds
[was Re: Libreoffice-qa Digest, Vol 29, Issue 27] On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Roopesh Kohad wrote: > I am unblocked with latest build today morning on tb-47 here > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@47-TDF/current/ Great! > Other boxes don't seem to have resolved. There is no latest build in tb-42 > or tb-39. Confirmed. CC'ing kendy (owner: tb-39) and thorsten (owner: tb-42). > The size of latest build on tb-47 as compared to earlier builds from tb-42 > seem to significantly higher (130 MB vs 119MB) and it also asked for > "restart" on installation. Is installer for tb-47 different than others? Bjoern - Any insight on why builds might have increased in size? > Just curious. > Please delete directory > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Windows-x86@47-TDF, its empty > and a distraction. CC'ing Cloph (owner: tb-47) for this one. Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
