Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Daily bibisect down?

[bjoern]

Please CC jibel[*] in such questions as otherwise we needlessly play chinese
whispers ...

Best,

Bjoern

[*] https://launchpad.net/~jibel

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:03:36PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Been getting this for the past couple weeks:
> 
> failed on url 
> http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync
> could not read control file from URL 
> http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync
> 
> 
> Any thoughts or ideas of what's going on?
> 
> 
> Best,
> Joel
> ___
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems? 
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Daily bibisect down?

[Joel Madero]

Hi All,

Been getting this for the past couple weeks:

failed on url 
http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync
could not read control file from URL 
http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync



Any thoughts or ideas of what's going on?


Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect last updated 2013-07-16

[Bjoern Michaelsen]

Hi Jean-Baptiste,

if time allows, could you have a look?

Best,

Bjoern from vacation

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:50:59PM -0700, Terrence Enger wrote:
> If I am reading
> 
> correctly, the daily bibisect was last updated 2013-07-16.  An update
> might be helpful with, for example, fdo#67799 "MAILMERGE: Pre-Defined
> Labels Contain No Format Info in LO 4.1.0.4", for which I see
> different behaviour between the daily bibisect "latest" and master about
> 10 days later.
> 
> Terry,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/daily-bibisect-last-updated-2013-07-16-tp4069134.html
> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems? 
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect last updated 2013-07-16

[Terrence Enger]

If I am reading

correctly, the daily bibisect was last updated 2013-07-16.  An update
might be helpful with, for example, fdo#67799 "MAILMERGE: Pre-Defined
Labels Contain No Format Info in LO 4.1.0.4", for which I see
different behaviour between the daily bibisect "latest" and master about
10 days later.

Terry,




--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/daily-bibisect-last-updated-2013-07-16-tp4069134.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[Mas]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:39 PM,  wrote:

> Just for convenience, my changes so far today are
>  php?title=QA%2FHowToBibisect&**diff=73158&oldid=73085
> >.
> They go beyond the changes I mention in-line.
>
>
> Quoting "Joel Madero" :
>
>  On 07/28/2013 12:00 PM, 
> libreoffice-qa-request@lists.**freedesktop.orgwrote:
>>
>>> I have added some instructions to deal with tags latest and oldest in
>>> the daily bibisect repo
>>> >> php?title=QA%2FHowToBibisect&**diff=73085&oldid=73084
>>> >.
>>> Will you be good enough to look over the changes?
>>>
>>> Of course, if the repo came with these tags laready in place, that
>>> whole section of the page could go away.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Terry.
>>>
>> I'll take a look - we've been talking quite a bit about cleaning this
>> page and I see that you're adding and cleaning it up. Was wondering if
>> you'd be willing (if not let me know and I'll take a stab at it) to do a
>> couple things to the page.
>>
>
> I will be glad to continue hacking at the page.
>
>
>> 1. Can you add a note that says if the bibisect shows the bug the entire
>> time (ie. it's prebibisect) to mark the version as 3.5beta0 in FDO - this
>> is the best we can do currently - and add "prebibisect" to whiteboard.
>>
>>  Done:  php?title=QA%2FHowToBibisect&**diff=73158&oldid=73157
> >.
>
>
>  2. Rearrange the page just a bit - I think logically
>> a) Intro
>> b) Limitations
>> c) Download stuff
>> d) how to bibisect (currently in a different location)
>> e) Bug that need bibisected
>> f) troubleshooting
>>
>>
> Done:  php?title=QA%2FHowToBibisect&**diff=73146&oldid=73144
> >
>
>
>> I think only one change there but it makes more sense intrinsically to me.
>>
>> 3. Another minor thing that I see is in "versions" it says bibisect40bugs
>> for bugs that need bibisecting - as far as I know every bug that needs
>> bibisected is "bibisectrequest" - I haven't seen the 4.0 and 4.0+ (daily)
>> differentiated - perhaps I missed something though :)
>>
>>
> BZ shows no bugs with “bibisect40” in either the Whiteboard or
> Keywords.  I changed it:
>  php?title=QA%2FHowToBibisect&**diff=73155&oldid=73151
> >
>
> I remember from June that the linked bugzilla queries use a baffling
> veriety of selection criteria.  Do you have an idea about whether
> there is a reason for this variety?  Or is it something that “just
> happened”?
>
>
>
>> Thanks Terry for tackling this how to wiki - it has a lot going on there
>> so the cleaner and simpler we make it the better.
>>
>>
> Hah!  We haven't even started on the witheboard statuses and
> prescribed comments for reporting the results.  The page already has a
> lot of instructions conditioned by the tester's choice of bibisect
> download.  I only foresee that getting worse: there are three bibisect
> versions, and each can be unhelpful when the regression is off either
> end.  (Yes, a regression newer than the 40+ version is plausible.  I
> went weeks without updating my download after an attempted update hung
> for days showing an ETA of a hundred odd days.)  Among the unseccssful
> cases, only the determination that a regression is older than the OVA
> or 40 repositories marks the end of the search.  How much should we
> try to track in the whiteboard status?
>
>
>  If you're busy or just don't want to do it just let me know - I didn't
>> want to be editing over you :)
>>
>
> I am happy to continue.  Knowing that someone is checking my work
> frees me to make bigger changes.
>
> Thanks,
> Terry,
>
>
good job on updating the page Terry .. I just got finishing reading over
the content.
-- 

Mas
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[dk122]

Just for convenience, my changes so far today are
.
They go beyond the changes I mention in-line.

Quoting "Joel Madero" :


On 07/28/2013 12:00 PM, libreoffice-qa-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:

I have added some instructions to deal with tags latest and oldest in
the daily bibisect repo
.
Will you be good enough to look over the changes?

Of course, if the repo came with these tags laready in place, that
whole section of the page could go away.

Thanks,
Terry.
I'll take a look - we've been talking quite a bit about cleaning  
this page and I see that you're adding and cleaning it up. Was  
wondering if you'd be willing (if not let me know and I'll take a  
stab at it) to do a couple things to the page.


I will be glad to continue hacking at the page.


1. Can you add a note that says if the bibisect shows the bug the  
entire time (ie. it's prebibisect) to mark the version as 3.5beta0  
in FDO - this is the best we can do currently - and add  
"prebibisect" to whiteboard.


Done:  
.



2. Rearrange the page just a bit - I think logically
a) Intro
b) Limitations
c) Download stuff
d) how to bibisect (currently in a different location)
e) Bug that need bibisected
f) troubleshooting



Done:  



I think only one change there but it makes more sense intrinsically to me.

3. Another minor thing that I see is in "versions" it says  
bibisect40bugs for bugs that need bibisecting - as far as I know  
every bug that needs bibisected is "bibisectrequest" - I haven't  
seen the 4.0 and 4.0+ (daily) differentiated - perhaps I missed  
something though :)




BZ shows no bugs with “bibisect40” in either the Whiteboard or
Keywords.  I changed it:


I remember from June that the linked bugzilla queries use a baffling
veriety of selection criteria.  Do you have an idea about whether
there is a reason for this variety?  Or is it something that “just
happened”?



Thanks Terry for tackling this how to wiki - it has a lot going on  
there so the cleaner and simpler we make it the better.




Hah!  We haven't even started on the witheboard statuses and
prescribed comments for reporting the results.  The page already has a
lot of instructions conditioned by the tester's choice of bibisect
download.  I only foresee that getting worse: there are three bibisect
versions, and each can be unhelpful when the regression is off either
end.  (Yes, a regression newer than the 40+ version is plausible.  I
went weeks without updating my download after an attempted update hung
for days showing an ETA of a hundred odd days.)  Among the unseccssful
cases, only the determination that a regression is older than the OVA
or 40 repositories marks the end of the search.  How much should we
try to track in the whiteboard status?

If you're busy or just don't want to do it just let me know - I  
didn't want to be editing over you :)


I am happy to continue.  Knowing that someone is checking my work
frees me to make bigger changes.

Thanks,
Terry,
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[Joel Madero]

On 07/28/2013 12:00 PM, libreoffice-qa-requ...@lists.freedesktop.org wrote:

I have added some instructions to deal with tags latest and oldest in
the daily bibisect repo
.
Will you be good enough to look over the changes?

Of course, if the repo came with these tags laready in place, that
whole section of the page could go away.

Thanks,
Terry.
I'll take a look - we've been talking quite a bit about cleaning this 
page and I see that you're adding and cleaning it up. Was wondering if 
you'd be willing (if not let me know and I'll take a stab at it) to do a 
couple things to the page.


1. Can you add a note that says if the bibisect shows the bug the entire 
time (ie. it's prebibisect) to mark the version as 3.5beta0 in FDO - 
this is the best we can do currently - and add "prebibisect" to whiteboard.


2. Rearrange the page just a bit - I think logically
a) Intro
b) Limitations
c) Download stuff
d) how to bibisect (currently in a different location)
e) Bug that need bibisected
f) troubleshooting


I think only one change there but it makes more sense intrinsically to me.

3. Another minor thing that I see is in "versions" it says 
bibisect40bugs for bugs that need bibisecting - as far as I know every 
bug that needs bibisected is "bibisectrequest" - I haven't seen the 4.0 
and 4.0+ (daily) differentiated - perhaps I missed something though :)



Thanks Terry for tackling this how to wiki - it has a lot going on there 
so the cleaner and simpler we make it the better.


If you're busy or just don't want to do it just let me know - I didn't 
want to be editing over you :)



Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[Terrence Enger]

On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 06:12 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi Terrence,
> 
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:54:11PM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> > Thank you Bjoern.  Everything you have suggested has worked as far as
> > I can go with it now; actual execution will need a 64-bit system, of
> > course.
> > 
> > Just a couple of things more, if I may, please.
> > 
> > (1) Should instructions for using the daily bibisect be added to "how
> > to bibisect" ?
> > 
> > If I attempt this, would you be willing to review the work to keep
> > me on the straight-and-narrow?
> 
> Absolutely, that would be awesome!
> 
> 
> > (2) I suspect that `git checkout latest` as on that page is
> > responsible for a lot of my difficulty.  At least after I checked
> > out master, I magically started getting most of the results you
> > said I should get.  Does this sound plausible?
> 
> Yes indeed, as the daily bibisect repo is updated daily it is missing the
> 'oldest' and 'latest' tags, which I usually manually created befoe uploading. 
> We might changed that though.
> 
> @Jean-Baptiste: Can we maybe do a:
> 
>  git tag -f oldest 3e7462bd65e692bf0592d5b080b7716341b62a47 && git tag -f 
> latest master
> 
> before pushing to the binrepo?
> 

I have added some instructions to deal with tags latest and oldest in
the daily bibisect repo
.
Will you be good enough to look over the changes?

Of course, if the repo came with these tags laready in place, that
whole section of the page could go away.

Thanks,
Terry.


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[Bjoern Michaelsen]

Hi Terrence,

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:54:11PM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> Thank you Bjoern.  Everything you have suggested has worked as far as
> I can go with it now; actual execution will need a 64-bit system, of
> course.
> 
> Just a couple of things more, if I may, please.
> 
> (1) Should instructions for using the daily bibisect be added to "how
> to bibisect" ?
> 
> If I attempt this, would you be willing to review the work to keep
> me on the straight-and-narrow?

Absolutely, that would be awesome!


> (2) I suspect that `git checkout latest` as on that page is
> responsible for a lot of my difficulty.  At least after I checked
> out master, I magically started getting most of the results you
> said I should get.  Does this sound plausible?

Yes indeed, as the daily bibisect repo is updated daily it is missing the
'oldest' and 'latest' tags, which I usually manually created befoe uploading. 
We might changed that though.

@Jean-Baptiste: Can we maybe do a:

 git tag -f oldest 3e7462bd65e692bf0592d5b080b7716341b62a47 && git tag -f 
latest master

before pushing to the binrepo?

Best,

Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[Terrence Enger]

Thank you Bjoern.  Everything you have suggested has worked as far as
I can go with it now; actual execution will need a 64-bit system, of
course.

Just a couple of things more, if I may, please.

(1) Should instructions for using the daily bibisect be added to "how
to bibisect" ?

If I attempt this, would you be willing to review the work to keep
me on the straight-and-narrow?

(2) I suspect that `git checkout latest` as on that page is
responsible for a lot of my difficulty.  At least after I checked
out master, I magically started getting most of the results you
said I should get.  Does this sound plausible?

Again, thank you for your help.

Terry.


On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 17:40 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> sorry for the late reply. I didnt find time to look into this earlier.
> 
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:17:31AM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> > I am for the first time trying to use a "daily" bibisect.  For the
> > terminally curious, this is in aid of fdo#64686 "Bug in Contour
> > Editor" .
> > To this end I downloaded and unpacked
> > http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma
> > (created 2013-05-08) and in the resulting binrepo/ I did 
> > `git checkout latest`.  Questions and difficulties arising ...
> > 
> > (*) The tar file has a sibling bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync.  Am I
> > supposed to use this for something?
> 
> If you install zsync (with `apt-get install zsync`), you can do:
> 
> zsync  
> http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync
> 
> which should do incremental updates.
> 
> > (*) binrepo/ lacks program soffice, and in particular it lacks
> > opt/program/soffice.  How am I supposed to run the program?
> > (There does exist opt/program/soffice.bin, but not ooenv which I
> > need to `source` first.)
> 
> Hmmm, with my copy doing a:
> 
>  git checkout master && git reset --hard HEAD
> 
> gives me a build of 5a8f5914c2077fe330d713a5d3a2be3b3f6a7e9a from 2013-05-07
> and the about box says so too.
> Checking out the oldest version with:
> 
>  git checkout 3e7462bd65e692bf0592d5b080b7716341b62a47 && git reset --hard 
> HEAD
> 
> gives me a build of 1eddfce9894fd05315173744f495619189093dc7 from 2013-02-05
> and the about box says so too.
> 
> > (*) `git log` shows 74 commits, the latest from February 2013.  I
> > expected to see later commits.
> 
> Strange:
> 
>  git log --pretty=oneline master|wc -l
>  263
> 
> looks fine here.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bjoern


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[Bjoern Michaelsen]

Hi,

sorry for the late reply. I didnt find time to look into this earlier.

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:17:31AM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> I am for the first time trying to use a "daily" bibisect.  For the
> terminally curious, this is in aid of fdo#64686 "Bug in Contour
> Editor" .
> To this end I downloaded and unpacked
> http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma
> (created 2013-05-08) and in the resulting binrepo/ I did 
> `git checkout latest`.  Questions and difficulties arising ...
> 
> (*) The tar file has a sibling bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync.  Am I
> supposed to use this for something?

If you install zsync (with `apt-get install zsync`), you can do:

zsync  
http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync

which should do incremental updates.

> (*) binrepo/ lacks program soffice, and in particular it lacks
> opt/program/soffice.  How am I supposed to run the program?
> (There does exist opt/program/soffice.bin, but not ooenv which I
> need to `source` first.)

Hmmm, with my copy doing a:

 git checkout master && git reset --hard HEAD

gives me a build of 5a8f5914c2077fe330d713a5d3a2be3b3f6a7e9a from 2013-05-07
and the about box says so too.
Checking out the oldest version with:

 git checkout 3e7462bd65e692bf0592d5b080b7716341b62a47 && git reset --hard HEAD

gives me a build of 1eddfce9894fd05315173744f495619189093dc7 from 2013-02-05
and the about box says so too.

> (*) `git log` shows 74 commits, the latest from February 2013.  I
> expected to see later commits.

Strange:

 git log --pretty=oneline master|wc -l
 263

looks fine here.

Best,

Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[Florian Reisinger]

Hi,

You are hearing the following from a Windows user (Not a that big help)

Am 17.05.2013 16:17, schrieb Terrence Enger:

I am for the first time trying to use a "daily" bibisect.  For the
terminally curious, this is in aid of fdo#64686 "Bug in Contour
Editor" .
To this end I downloaded and unpacked
http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma
(created 2013-05-08) and in the resulting binrepo/ I did
`git checkout latest`.  Questions and difficulties arising ...

(*) The tar file has a sibling bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync.  Am I
 supposed to use this for something?


Yep, you may download newer versions with that (I do not know more...)



(*) binrepo/ lacks program soffice, and in particular it lacks
 opt/program/soffice.  How am I supposed to run the program?
 (There does exist opt/program/soffice.bin, but not ooenv which I
 need to `source` first.)




(*) `git log` shows 74 commits, the latest from February 2013.  I
 expected to see later commits.


IMHO it is daily updated, but unable to test :(



Guidance welcome.

Thanks,
Terry.


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/



--
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] daily bibisect

[Terrence Enger]

I am for the first time trying to use a "daily" bibisect.  For the
terminally curious, this is in aid of fdo#64686 "Bug in Contour
Editor" .
To this end I downloaded and unpacked
http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma
(created 2013-05-08) and in the resulting binrepo/ I did 
`git checkout latest`.  Questions and difficulties arising ...

(*) The tar file has a sibling bibisect-4.0.tar.lzma.zsync.  Am I
supposed to use this for something?

(*) binrepo/ lacks program soffice, and in particular it lacks
opt/program/soffice.  How am I supposed to run the program?
(There does exist opt/program/soffice.bin, but not ooenv which I
need to `source` first.)

(*) `git log` shows 74 commits, the latest from February 2013.  I
expected to see later commits.

Guidance welcome.

Thanks,
Terry.


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Daily Bibisect builds for Ubuntu

[JorenDC]

Hi Bjoern, Jean Baptiste, *,

Thanks for that! Really useful.

Although I think there is a problem when you try to 'git checkout 
oldest'. This result in an empty folder (so you can't run 
'opt/program/soffice'). I workaround it by start the bibisect 
immediately (and hopes the oldest version included is still a 'good' 
version). Any suggestions/ideas/fix for that?


A second question is: how can we keep it up to date? I tried a 'git pull 
-r' but that result in a:


fatal: No remote repository specified.  Please, specify either a URL or a
remote name from which new revisions should be fetched.

Thanks for this awesome work and time,
Joren

Op 01-05-13 22:55, Bjoern Michaelsen schreef:

Hi,

it seems the daily bibisect builds of LibreOffice by Canonicals QA are working
and are published reliably now:

  http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/

These builds start around the time of the 4.0 branch off in December 2012, so
they are connecting to the previously generated repository, giving us coverage
from mid-3.6 to the current daily build.

Im CCing Jean-Baptiste, who did all the hard work on this one and deserves all
the kudos for this! ;)

So now you effectively have bibisect testing right up to the daily build, which
I think is quite awesome.

Best,

Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Daily Bibisect builds for Ubuntu

[Bjoern Michaelsen]

Hi,

it seems the daily bibisect builds of LibreOffice by Canonicals QA are working
and are published reliably now:

 http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/

These builds start around the time of the 4.0 branch off in December 2012, so
they are connecting to the previously generated repository, giving us coverage
from mid-3.6 to the current daily build.

Im CCing Jean-Baptiste, who did all the hard work on this one and deserves all
the kudos for this! ;)

So now you effectively have bibisect testing right up to the daily build, which
I think is quite awesome.

Best,

Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/