[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 107158] [META] Groupedbar variant of the Notebookbar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107158 Bug 107158 depends on bug 118351, which changed state. Bug 118351 Summary: Writer's Groupedbar. There are two drop-down menus "Edit" if selected drawing object https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118351 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 107158] [META] Groupedbar variant of the Notebookbar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107158 Bug 107158 depends on bug 114713, which changed state. Bug 114713 Summary: Incorrect style names in groupedbars https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114713 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 107158] [META] Groupedbar variant of the Notebookbar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107158 Bug 107158 depends on bug 118353, which changed state. Bug 118353 Summary: Writer's Groupedbar. Move item Field from drop-down menu Reference to drop-down menu Insert https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118353 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 34355] Option to show track changes in margin is missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34355 --- Comment #51 from bla...@engineer.com --- (In reply to whynot from comment #50) > @Jean-Baptiste: > > I appreciate sharing that a balloon view is not your preference. However, > many have a completely different preference. I suppose that further suggests > that this should be a changeable setting. > > I personally agree with many, many in this thread that the balloon > visualization of changes is a "must-have" feature. I spend the majority of > my day writing, and I professionally depend on it. For me this feature is so > critical and important that I simply cannot use LibreOffice for > collaborative writing with my entire team. > > I use the mode in MS Word where it shows the final version of the document, > but highlights the deleted text in balloons on the border. Personally, I > think that having the cross-out text in the middle of the remaining text > makes it visually very challenging, and in many cases unreadable. The other > disadvantage of keeping the deleted text and showing it in "cross-out" > letters is that it bloats the length of the document. What I find so > beautiful about the "balloon mode" is that the document looks very similar > to the final version, but the deleted stuff is still visible on the > sidelines. For many things we write, the length of the document is very > critical. If you keep the deleted text in there (cross-out), the document > will appear to get longer and longer, the more changes there are (and it > becomes less readable). This will mess up a lot of things in the document, > for instance how text flows around figures, etc. > > A few years ago, someone maintained a "wish list" web page with the Top 10 > most desired features for LibreOffice/OpenOffice. This particular request > was solid #1 pretty much the entire time. So there are A LOT of people who > really, really want and need this feature. I think some of the comments on > this thread also reflect this. Based on this background, commenting that > this is simply a "bad idea" is not helpful. I understand that people have > different preferences, and FOSS is all about choice. Telling users that > there need and wish of having this feature is a bad idea is not really > appreciative of their feedback. I could not agree more with this comment. It is probably the most mentioned missing feature when it comes to collaborative writing and the reason many groups use MS Word for anything that requires input from several users, be it a one-page letter or a long report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 107158] [META] Groupedbar variant of the Notebookbar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107158 Bug 107158 depends on bug 119736, which changed state. Bug 119736 Summary: Missed section Insert on Groupedbar in Writer when cursor is in table https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119736 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 34355] Option to show track changes in margin is missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34355 --- Comment #50 from why...@nurfuerspam.de --- @Jean-Baptiste: I appreciate sharing that a balloon view is not your preference. However, many have a completely different preference. I suppose that further suggests that this should be a changeable setting. I personally agree with many, many in this thread that the balloon visualization of changes is a "must-have" feature. I spend the majority of my day writing, and I professionally depend on it. For me this feature is so critical and important that I simply cannot use LibreOffice for collaborative writing with my entire team. I use the mode in MS Word where it shows the final version of the document, but highlights the deleted text in balloons on the border. Personally, I think that having the cross-out text in the middle of the remaining text makes it visually very challenging, and in many cases unreadable. The other disadvantage of keeping the deleted text and showing it in "cross-out" letters is that it bloats the length of the document. What I find so beautiful about the "balloon mode" is that the document looks very similar to the final version, but the deleted stuff is still visible on the sidelines. For many things we write, the length of the document is very critical. If you keep the deleted text in there (cross-out), the document will appear to get longer and longer, the more changes there are (and it becomes less readable). This will mess up a lot of things in the document, for instance how text flows around figures, etc. A few years ago, someone maintained a "wish list" web page with the Top 10 most desired features for LibreOffice/OpenOffice. This particular request was solid #1 pretty much the entire time. So there are A LOT of people who really, really want and need this feature. I think some of the comments on this thread also reflect this. Based on this background, commenting that this is simply a "bad idea" is not helpful. I understand that people have different preferences, and FOSS is all about choice. Telling users that there need and wish of having this feature is a bad idea is not really appreciative of their feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 112002] Make presentation layouts editable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112002 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval |needsDevAdvice CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com |.freedesktop.org| --- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze --- The question is whether editing the slide layout (Slide > Layout) is possible or if those layouts are defined in the ODF. For example, two triangular content sections or nine content section etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 111633] Missing GUI option for text rotation inside Impress table
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111633 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |mentoring@documentfoundatio |.freedesktop.org|n.org, ||tietze.he...@gmail.com Keywords|needsUXEval |easyHack, needsDevEval See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 ||2039 --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- Suggestion for the UI given in c3, likely a simple easyhack. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 89428] Hiding scrollbars when not need in Impress/Draw
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89428 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |mentoring@documentfoundatio |.freedesktop.org|n.org, ||tietze.he...@gmail.com Keywords|needsUXEval |easyHack, needsDevEval --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- Confirming from UX POV. Could be an easyhack. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 88287] UI: Rename "Lines" toolbar and removing "Arrows" toolbar from View > Toolbars
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88287 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103239 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103239 [Bug 103239] [META] Toolbars bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 89250] FILEOPEN: IMPRESS implement a default set of automatic font substitutions for missing fonts
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89250 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com |.freedesktop.org| Keywords|needsDevAdvice, needsUXEval | --- Comment #17 from Heiko Tietze --- So let's resolve this issue as font substitution is working in principle. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 89250] FILEOPEN: IMPRESS implement a default set of automatic font substitutions for missing fonts
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89250 --- Comment #16 from Caolán McNamara --- There's a bunch of code in LibreOffice that's supposed to make this "just work". If I cut and paste the [] missing symbol character from impress to writer, select it and in the font name widget in the toolbar hit return there, then it reformats as a proper bullet. So I think its just that in this specific case its not working for some reason -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 66870] Add export menu to enhance export capabilities in SVG format.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com |.freedesktop.org| --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- I wouldn't expose the SVG on the menu root like PDF. It's just another file type and if we show this one could easily ask for compatibility and want pptx there. However, when this is about a properties dialog that shows up after SVG was selected for saving, a dialog similar to print or PDF, it sounds reasonable. The dialog could take the sections Range and Images from the PDF options for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 121967] Can't select/pick multiples shapes or images in Writer/Calc/Impress/Draw with CTRL key
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121967 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||98259 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98259 [Bug 98259] [META] Keyboard shortcuts and accelerators bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 62786] PRINTING: Allow click to enter page range field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62786 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsDevEval, needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com |.freedesktop.org| --- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze --- It's not only impossible with standard controls but also bad usability. You might have seen the pattern to click on a disabled control and it magically accepts the focus on the web. Besides standard controls don't allow this as Roman wrote in c7, the drawback is a) it's not discoverable for the user, and b) you loose the important information of being disabled for a good reason. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 121967] Can't select/pick multiples shapes or images in Writer/Calc/Impress/Draw with CTRL key
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121967 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||armin.le.gr...@me.com, ||rb.hensc...@t-online.de --- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze --- Armin, Regina: We talked about this issue in the design meeting with the idea to just exchange shift with ctrl. And while it is convincing to some degree there might also some hurdles. Like shift+dropclick to duplicate or ctrl+doubleclick to go through the z-order of stacked objects (doesn't work for me). Point is, if we change shift to ctrl it might open Pandora's box. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 51554] Data loss risk referencing slides from external impress presentation (Menu Insert -> File, selecting link)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51554 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com |.freedesktop.org| Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyInteresting, ||easyHack, needsDevEval, ||skillCpp, topicUI --- Comment #15 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #13) > Simplest solution is to just not permit changes of linked files. We talked about this topic in the design meeting and agreed on this solution. But there should be a chance for the user to override and this could be done per infobar as known from Writer when a document is readonly. Sounds like an easyhack, though not too simple. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 121883] Gutters
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121883 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com |.freedesktop.org| Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Keywords|needsUXEval | Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to litvine from comment #6) > Created attachment 147480 [details] Thanks for the screenshots, that makes things much clearer. The issue is your page setting. The default margin is 2cm to the left but you have just ~0.5cm space. Or alternatively reduce the space between line numbering and text, which is 50pt (=1,76cm) in your configuration and a bit too much for the default. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
