[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 155352] AT support - Implement edit cursor-tracking for pan and scroll of document view port
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155352 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 141296] Find & Replace must not change current selection
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141296 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Find & Replace: Checkmark |Find & Replace must not |"Current selection only"|change current selection |automatically unset after | |repeating "find" (or "find/ | |replace") despite that area | |is still marked | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval | Status|NEEDINFO|NEW OS|Linux (All) |All --- Comment #13 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting. The option depends on whether a selection has been made or just one cell is selected, and automatically set on or off. Excel always applies F&R to the selection or all cells, meaning our option is rather to ignore the selection. Another difference is that we select the cells with replaced content, which is very convenient in most cases. But fails for iterative operations. The suggestion is to select the replaced cells only if no selection was made before; i.e. to keep it. And ideally to introduce a different kind of feedback, eg. per accent color. And consequently to remove the option to disable it. Essentially a duplicate of bug 132031. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 155050] Confusion between "bibliography entry" and "citation"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155050 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||115596 Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyInteresting, ||easyHack, skillDesign, ||topicUI Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting. Zotero uses "Citation" and Bibliography as well as MSO Word. Therefore we should do as suggested. The term is spread over some files. sw/uiconfig/swriter/ui/ createauthorentry.ui, bibliographyentry.ui, tocentriespage.ui sw/inc/strings.hrc officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterCommands.xcu and apparently tested/used in some importers sw/qa/extras/ooxmlimport/ooxmlimport.cxx sw/qa/extras/odfimport/odfimport.cxx Not so simple easyhack. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115596 [Bug 115596] [META] Labels of UNO commands bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149625] FORMATTING: Pasting a table cell, pastes the source cell in the upper/actual cell as an inner table cell
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149625 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting. Nested table is a requirement (see META ticket under Blocks) and a ODF feature. We have to support it. Not least as MSO has the same feature (import/export works well). Inserting a nested table is possible, although one has to meet a couple of preconditions (see comment 4). But it's always possible to insert a table into a cell. There is no bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 151133] Introduce function to remove empty rows/columns
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151133 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|lowest |medium Keywords|needsUXEval | Summary|Remove empty rows faster in |Introduce function to |Calc (add in LO instead of |remove empty rows/columns |extension) | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Blocks|145878 |108364, 86899 --- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting and agree with the requirement (have to withdraw my comment 8; removing empty rows is in fact a procedure I do myself quite often). An inbuilt function should be more convenient and faster than the extension. The function should work on the selection, if any made, or the range with content and either remove empty rows (taking care of hidden cells) or empty columns. The command should be available on the context menu as well under the Sheet main menu. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86899 [Bug 86899] [META] Requests for the addition of UNO commands https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108364 [Bug 108364] [META] Table/Row/Column/Cell management function bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145878 [Bug 145878] [META] Enhancements that could be realized per extension -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 155214] Rename “Modify” button to "Assign"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155214 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyBeginner, ||easyHack, skillDesign, ||topicUI Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|rename “Modify” button into |Rename “Modify” button to |"Assign"|"Assign" Severity|enhancement |normal Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org, ||mentoring@documentfoundatio ||n.org --- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting and think Assign suits better here. Code pointer: cui/uiconfig/ui/accelconfigpage.ui -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90989] Simplified options dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90989 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|heiko.tietze@documentfounda | |tion.org| --- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting. The conclusion was to keep the topic and add a simplified version of the options. (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #9) > What assumptions were the students making about all that? Assumptions? They run interviews, analyzed the content, created a mockup- no work was done to structure all the options or even parts (which I believe is not possible with those methods). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 155249] Make different anchoring of charts, images and so on distinguishable by formatting marks (aids)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155249 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze --- The virtual border around objects anchored As Character makes a lot of sense as you don't know what is spacing and what the object. Cannot say if it's intentionally set or unset for the To Character anchor but having it only on two sides is obviously a bug. But I would treat that differently from the request to change the anchoring icon. To know what type of anchor is set would be good - and has been requested in bug 138351. So kind of a duplicate- assuming As Character does not need an anchor icon. Feel free to reopen or create a new ticket on other aspects such as the spurious border (does not happen for charts but I've seen it on images too, IIRC). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 138351 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 154575] Should "Update entry from selection" icon be shown when using "Edit Index Entry" dialog?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154575 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.org| Severity|minor |normal Keywords|needsUXEval | --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- “Update entry from selection“ refreshes the Entry field according the current selection (the dialog is amodal). There is no point in showing this option in edit mode. By hiding it we would solve bug 154209 probably as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90989] Simplified options dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90989 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||4814 Hardware|Other |All -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90989] Simplified options dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90989 --- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10) > Assumptions? They run interviews, analyzed the content, created a mockup- no > work was done to structure all the options or even parts (which I believe is > not possible with those methods). Well, if they don't take into account the fact that it's going to be revamped in a way that's orthogonal to this bug - then they may be asking the wrong questions in the interviews and mocking up something which [is supposed to/may] become irrelevant anyways. Which is a shame. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 155393] Crash in SfxShell::GetViewShell()
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155393 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- (In reply to Jim Raykowski from comment #5) > Created attachment 187416 [details] > Notes view navigator demo > > Here is a demo of slides and page objects in Notes view being shown in the > Navigator. This looks great, thanks Jim! Making the navigator useful to the Notes view is a way better solution, thanks for going in that direction. I couldn't find a corresponding enhancement request on Bugzilla, but it looks to me like a non-controversial, welcome addition. Copying the UX team in in any case. UX team: Jim was just going to fix a crash (gerrit#152027) but also explored making the Navigator functional for Notes view as an alternative (video and gerrit#152075). Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 135501] Change the default UI (summaries in comment 67, comment 89, comment 133)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||4996 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 155393] Crash in SfxShell::GetViewShell()
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155393 --- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze --- Having the Navigator functional for Notes is a big win. Disabling it would be odd as you cannot jump to a certain slide. Anything in particular that needs UX review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 155393] Crash in SfxShell::GetViewShell()
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155393 --- Comment #9 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8) > Having the Navigator functional for Notes is a big win. Disabling it would > be odd as you cannot jump to a certain slide. Anything in particular that > needs UX review? Nothing in particular, just wanted to make sure others were notified and were able to give feedback as there is no enhancement request linked to this feature. (And possibly get a +1 on gerrit!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149625] FORMATTING: Pasting a table cell, pastes the source cell in the upper/actual cell as an inner table cell
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149625 --- Comment #10 from LeroyG --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9) > Nested table is a requirement. That is not in discussion here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149625] FORMATTING: Pasting a table cell, pastes the source cell in the upper/actual cell as an inner table cell
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149625 --- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to LeroyG from comment #10) > > Nested table is a requirement. > That is not in discussion here. Please elaborate if we missed the point of your report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
