[Bug 160873] Usability: "OLE Object" probably not familiar language (Menu: Insert/OLE Object)

2024-04-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160873

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Writer  |UI

--- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
(changed component to "UI" because it would have to be changed outside of
Writer too, e.g. in Calc)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160873] Usability: "OLE Object" probably not familiar language (Menu: Insert/OLE Object)

2024-04-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160873

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
 Blocks||85811

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
In essence, I agree that users might not use that submenu because of how
obscure the name is to them. But if we go further and actually rename from "OLE
object" to something else, there are many places where the term is used,
including the Navigator. And then there's hundreds of updates for help pages
and guides.
How would one differentiate OLE objects from others then? It would have to be
more verbose, like "Linked or Embedded Objects".

So I guess my opinion is: OK to not use "OLE" in the menu, but against changing
it to something else elsewhere.

(In reply to jan d from comment #0)
> I could not find out if QR-Code actually uses OLE,
> since there is no editing capability exposed and the result seems to be
> handeled as an image, which is what OLE actually should overcome.
I was actually wondering about that. Seems like QR/Barcode shouldn't be in
there anyway. And when the feature was recently shared on social media, users
were surprised it was so hidden away.

+1 to pull those out of the OLE submenu if possible, or use a more intuitive
categorisation so it doesn't get too big. (It's already the biggest menu in
Writer with View and Format.)
Also: chart is not in the OLE submenu, but it is an OLE object!


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85811
[Bug 85811] [META] Main menu bar bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"

2024-04-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732

--- Comment #12 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #11)
> (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10)
> > How about "Navigate History" or "Navigate Positions"?
> I think the idea is to remove navigate/navigation/navigator from the mix and
> avoid any potential to misidentify.
Indeed, and it has the added benefit of being able to use the same string in
Navigate By (without repeating "Navigate"). I think we need both "history" for
the familiarity with browsers, and "position" to clarify it's about cursor
position (and not age of objects).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"

2024-04-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732

--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10)
> How about "Navigate History" or "Navigate Positions"?
> 
> I'm also ok with "Position History", although I like that less.

I think the idea is to remove navigate/navigation/navigator from the mix and
avoid any potential to misidentify.

"Position History" seems to work best in that context.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160324] Column resize handle touch-target too small

2024-04-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160324

--- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to jon.macca...@gmail.com from comment #0)
> The column resize handle touch target is only 1-2px wide,

It's at least 4 px wide, if not 5, for me.

Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: ffccbf4762a9ae810bcdd21c41fccdd436e7bfc9
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.6; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: he-IL (en_IL); UI: en-US

Could this be a Windows-specific problem?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"

2024-04-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732

--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
How about "Navigate History" or "Navigate Positions"?

I'm also ok with "Position History", although I like that less.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160752] Protect ratio as Image option

2024-04-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160752

Telesto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.