[Bug 161031] Form creating is too niche to merit a main menu item visible by default

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161031

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|NOTABUG |WONTFIX

--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
Our agreement at the meeting was on WONTFIX.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160938] FORMCONTROLS: Add ability to Find and Replace field names

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160938

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|medium  |low
   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |.freedesktop.org|tion.org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze  ---
We discussed the topic in the design meeting.

Object names are unique and F&R is very unlikely to support some workflow. But
being an ODF editor we should have a place to find all objects, and together
with regular expressions it the function might become handy.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161218] Inconsistent and confusing Text Flow | Break options in Table Properties

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161218

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Proposed solution in bug 151002

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 151002 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 150514] Formatting shortcut to clip/truncate text display in cells (instead of overflowing into next cell)

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150514

--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Rather a duplicate of bug 134249.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161223] basic HTML cell render

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161090] Allow specifying how many / which values are grouped in remainder of Pie-of-Pie or Bar-of-Pie chart

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090

Mihai Vasiliu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
   ||1229

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161223] basic HTML cell render

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de

--- Comment #1 from Regina Henschel  ---
The request is not clear to me. Do you want to create the cell text by a
formula? If yes, do you request an enhancement to the formula language to
include formatting on parts of the text?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 153309] Provide framework to suppress editing with direct formatting of a styled document, or template.

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153309

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|7.4.4.2 release |Inherited From OOo
 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl

--- Comment #11 from Cor Nouws  ---
- in general: huge proponent of using styles
- forcing users, and not nudging them (with great tools) will make that users
look for different ways to do what they want..
- why Writer and not global - after all the suggestion is a Framework..

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161223] basic HTML cell render

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234

Rafael Lima  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|unspecified |24.8.0.0 alpha0+
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
(In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #0)
> 1) The square used for dragging is not drawn correctly, and if the zoom is
> above 220% it gets disconnected from the cell outline, giving a weird
> impression of a bug
I had a observed the same and wanted to report the issue.

> 2) The distance between the cell outline and the cell should not be
> proportional to the zoom level. When the zoom level is too high, the
> distance between the outline and the cell becomes too much. We should use an
> absolute distance, similar to the one when the zoom is 100%
Wouldn't this be an issue at lower zoom levels?

Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha1+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: ae798781ef4df7a1fdef13af0bc459bf4f6e7b4c
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234

m_a_riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #2 from m_a_riosv  ---
Reproducible with
Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha1+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: eb3ae3234e098e1ee605624b0cac4c90436628d0
CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 11 X86_64 (10.0 build 22631); UI render:
Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234

--- Comment #3 from Rafael Lima  ---
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #1)
> Wouldn't this be an issue at lower zoom levels?

I don't think this would be an issue... I tested it in 30% zoom and it looks
fine, because the distance at 100% is not a lot.

There's also the issue with the line width, because it increases and decreases
with zoom. Maybe this should also be a fixed value (as Google Sheets does).

Also, at some zoom levels (such as 95%) the distance at the bottom and right
sides are larger than the distances at the top and left sides.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234

--- Comment #4 from ady  ---
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #1)
> (In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #0)
> > 1) The square used for dragging is not drawn correctly, and if the zoom is
> > above 220% it gets disconnected from the cell outline, giving a weird
> > impression of a bug
> I had a observed the same and wanted to report the issue.

I don't understand what is described here as "not drawn correctly". IIUC, there
is some (not-fixed, proportional?) distance between the squared fill handle and
the "active-cell line", in whichever zoom factor. Other than that, what exactly
is "different and wrong" when zooming-in and dragging the fill handle? At which
exact detail should we be looking (in comparison to 100% zoom, or in comparison
to older versions)?

> 
> > 2) The distance between the cell outline and the cell should not be
> > proportional to the zoom level. When the zoom level is too high, the
> > distance between the outline and the cell becomes too much. We should use an
> > absolute distance, similar to the one when the zoom is 100%
> Wouldn't this be an issue at lower zoom levels?

If there is an issue at lower zoom levels (or at high screen resolutions?),
maybe there should be both lower and upper limits / thresholds – the distance
(between the cell limits and the "active-cell line") should not be shorter than
‘x’ value nor larger than ‘y’ value, and the distance would vary in between
those 2 limits according to zoom or screen resolution.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161223] basic HTML cell render

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223

--- Comment #2 from David  ---
My proposal is that the final render of the cell content could be based on a
partial subset of html, focusing on format tags, this way on the final
rendering phase if it contains tags they are used for format. It is quite
similar to the way Qt widgets work. For a calc cell some examples:
- plain text -> no format at all
- after formula evaluation the result is plain text -> no format at all
- cell text has html tags -> apply them to the final render
- after formula evaluation the final text has html tags -> apply them to the
final render

  I would stick to the basic format tags, like bold, italic, underline, etc, it
does not make sense to implemente a table into a cell.

  I think this feature could improve a lot conditional format and become an
advantage compared to competitors spreadsheet software.

BR

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 153309] Support disabling direct formatting

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153309

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Provide framework to|Support disabling direct
   |suppress editing with   |formatting
   |direct formatting of a  |
   |styled document, or |
   |template.   |

--- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
It would be useful to allow opt-in suppression of DF - not to force users, but
for users who want to engage in this kind of self-discipline. +1 from me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161223] basic HTML cell render

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161223] basic HTML cell render

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|1   |0
 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234

--- Comment #5 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
(In reply to ady from comment #4)
> I don't understand what is described here as "not drawn correctly".
I was referring to the square not following the rectangle and eventually
getting disconnected at higher zoom levels. Not sure if some additional thing
was meant by Rafael's "not drawn correctly".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160983] RecalcOptimalRowHeightMode should be effective for CSV imports also

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160983

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||balazs.varga...@gmail.com,
   ||jl...@mail.com,
   ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval
 Blocks||109239
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
   ||3026,
   ||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
   ||4098

--- Comment #10 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
I see the "calculating" message and the high-height cells (e.g. at row 54) when
importing the sample file with only comma as a delimiter.

Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

I can see how it can be frustrating for users wanting to edit simple formats
like CSV/TSV, expecting LO to handle it as simply as possible.

Ideally, you'd expect a simple on/off setting in the import dialog, along the
lines of "Adapt row height to fit contents"? Or something different?

Justin and Balazs, you recently worked on RecalcOptimalRowHeightMode, what do
you think? 

Copying the UX/Design team in for opinion.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109239
[Bug 109239] [META] CSV / TSV / Text Import and export / Text to Columns
dialogs bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.