[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org, ||mentoring@documentfoundatio ||n.org Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyBeginner, ||easyHack, skillDesign, ||topicDesign --- Comment #13 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed the topic in the design meeting and welcome both suggestions. Code pointer: * UIName for the navigationobjectbar in officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterWindowState.xcu * ST_RECENCY in sw/inc/strings.hrc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #12 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #11) > (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10) > > How about "Navigate History" or "Navigate Positions"? > I think the idea is to remove navigate/navigation/navigator from the mix and > avoid any potential to misidentify. Indeed, and it has the added benefit of being able to use the same string in Navigate By (without repeating "Navigate"). I think we need both "history" for the familiarity with browsers, and "position" to clarify it's about cursor position (and not age of objects). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10) > How about "Navigate History" or "Navigate Positions"? > > I'm also ok with "Position History", although I like that less. I think the idea is to remove navigate/navigation/navigator from the mix and avoid any potential to misidentify. "Position History" seems to work best in that context. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg --- How about "Navigate History" or "Navigate Positions"? I'm also ok with "Position History", although I like that less. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #7) > Sounds like "Position History" is the top contender - which makes me think: > do we also want to make the Navigate By dropdown's text consistent with it, > by replacing "Recency" with "Position History"? "Navigate by - position > history" works well. > I think it would make sense and clarify the role. "Recency" makes it sound > like "how recently the object was created". In that list, it's the only > element out of 21 that is about about "things that don't exist anymore". All > other elements are about "what currently exists in the document" (or > session, for Reminders). We better make that extra clear with an > appropriate, consistent label. > "Position History" (16 chars) wouldn't be too long for that Navigate By list > - "Wrong table formula" is already longer (20 chars). No objection, +1 "In for a Penny..." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 --- Comment #8 from Jim Raykowski --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #7) +1 Tracks exactly with what I was thinking all the way down to the "Position History" length compared to the "Wrong table formula" length. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Navigate by - Recency"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Rename "Navigation" toolbar |Rename "Navigation" toolbar |to clarify its role, avoid |to clarify its role, avoid |confusion, and relate to|confusion, and relate to |"Recency" |"Navigate by - Recency" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
