[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||5110 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org Keywords|needsUXEval | --- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze --- We should implement this per context menu item "Remove" on the Styles Inspector, see bug 135110. Could be an interesting easy hack. What do you think, Mike? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 Thomas Lendo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.le...@gmail.com Blocks||107838 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107838 [Bug 107838] [META] Character-level bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 --- Comment #13 from Mike Kaganski --- I believe that implementing the proposal published by design team about fine-grained formatting display/control would automatically solve this... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 --- Comment #12 from Frederic Parrenin --- Yes, I agree a way to solve my problem is to use styles instead of any direct formatting. On the other hand, when you have a big document that uses direct formattings, and you don't want to change all of that to styles, it might be a quicker solution to remove a particular direct formatting. It happens to me in particular with fonts, it often happens that my document mixes different fonts and that I want to clean that. It is possible right now to remove all direct formatting, so why not allowing to remove a specific one? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 --- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg --- I'm not sure it's a good idea to provide this feature. It may be too much of an encouragement of using complex manual formatting. Frederic, you can just change the font manually to whatever you like. Why should LO "legitimize" a non-style combination of manual formatting? ... or create a style from your multiple manual formatting, and revert to that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89 ||826 --- Comment #10 from V Stuart Foote --- The 'Format' mode of Find & Replace... dialog seems a reasonable location to accomplish this. It currently provides a means to find Direct Formatting recorded to text style:name / style:family (the 'T' code) applied to text runs of paragraphs. It currently provides direct replacement to change the DF of the text run. What is missing is ability for replacement 'Format' to be 'unformatted', and to simply clear that DF. And to allow the text run to pick up the style assigned to the paragraph (the applied 'P' code). Same approach, using the Format mode for Find & Replace, might also solve bug 89826 - Allow removal/reset of individual style attributes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 --- Comment #9 from Frederic Parrenin --- > The recommended workflow is still to clean up per Remove Direct Formatting > and to use character styles Yes, thank you for bringing this workaround solution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 ||7708 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6) > So, guess there is potential to implement. Question is rather if we want to support single DF removal. The recommended workflow is still to clean up per Remove Direct Formatting and to use character styles (where we have the same problem, see bug 89826). Guess the issue is mostly related to font names. Why not remove the DF when it fits the PS/CS? Without any UI. Don't we have a request on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 --- Comment #7 from Frederic Parrenin --- Thank you for your understanding. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote --- To unconfirmed. For UX-advise I have not issue directly editing the XML (content.xml, styles.xml) from an ODF archive (easier in Flat ODF .fodt). As noted, the Find/Replace dialog 'Format' will do a replacement 1-1 of font/effect/size-- but there is no replacement Format to revert the found selection's span to a non-DF span. Would need a 'Format' replace action to actually clear the DF applied to the found span, merging it into the current Paragraph's run. And if the style:name/style:family 'T' direct formatting becomes unused, to clear it from the content XML. So, guess there is potential to implement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 --- Comment #5 from Frederic Parrenin --- I am sorry but I am not sure I understand you. You says: "No, you asked for means to remove a single DF. That exists now in GUI (or you can edit the XML content of the ODF directly)." Where does it exist in GUI? For me, "Find and Replace" replaces a direct formatting, but it does not remove it. I agree there is a bit work to understand what is the best UI to do it and to implement it. But for me this is a needed feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130930] Ability to remove one specific direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130930 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote --- No, you asked for means to remove a single DF. That exists now in GUI (or you can edit the XML content of the ODF directly). If you have that much work to do to clean up Direct Formatting (DF), it is much better to copy and paste as unformatted text, picking up the assigned paragraph style for the target. And apply text DF or better Character style. Issues of trying to identify all DF applied to a selection, a paragraph, or to a full document make it very unlikely targeted removal of DF could be implemented effectively. And this would be an immediate => WF -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
