Re: thank you elon musk

2022-04-27 Thread Jean Louis
* Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss  
[2022-04-27 09:38]:
> 
> 
> On 26/04/2022 20:38, Adrienne G. Thompson wrote:
> > Hi Thomas:
> > 
> >   If the FSF is not now going very hard on promoting Mastadon,
> >   they should never be trusted to anything right again.
> > 
> > Why take such a negative approach? Why not, instead, propose a campaign
> > to promote Mastodon? We are here to support the Free Software Movement
> > - a movement that relies on contributions beyond code.
> > Adrienne G. Thompson
> > Principal and Chief Code Artist, GNU C-Graph

Promoting Mastodon means promoting to users to install their own
instances and decentralize social network. Decentralized social
networks like Mastodon, Pleroma, Pixelfeed, PeerTube, Friendica,
Lemmy, WriteFreely, Funkwhale, Mobilizon, BookWyrm -- are all part of
it. 

Join the Fediverse
https://joinfediverse.wiki/Main_Page

Don't promote single software, promote decentralized social networks.

> I agree here,  Mastodon does need content,

Then maybe you do not understand the difference between software and
the instance. Mastodon is just software, by itself it has no
"content". Interaction with users is what creates content. There are
many Mastodon instances of software installed, and it does not make
sense to say "Mastodon" needs content, not for me who knows that there
are so many people already participating every day.

> it has that to a point as I subscribe to feeds from Sciencedaily for
> example, but few people interact.  As far as I am aware people not
> exactly have long conversations on twitter either.

It may not be the same experience as on Twitter -- but still is far
far from saying that there is nothing on Mastodon. I have found
friends through decentralized networks, and one can interact for hours
and hours, discuss those issues not important at all like cuddling
with cats, or politics, or important other issues.

> As a platform, or set of platforms they can't move forward unless
> people say what they want, and help promote.

It is automatic. I see many instances running.

> I tend to avoid mastodon,  as there are more people on there who seem to be
> anti vaccination, anti science and racist, so it doesn't help me,

Again, "to avoid Mastodon" would mean you are avoiding specific
software installed on all instances. Does that mean you prefer
Friendica or Pleroma?

But that is not what you are talking about, you are talking about your
personal account on specific instance, which is unrelated to Mastodon
as software even if it runs such software. You are talking about your
choice of friends with whom you interact.

Mastodon as software has nothing related to people's opinions on
vaccination, science or racism.

You have got it wrong. Either you don't understand what is single
instance or you don't express yourself correctly.

Additionally, when you interact with people, they may be writing you
from quite different instance of software such as Pleroma, and you may
not know it.

> Free software is just as much about the community of developers,  users,
> creators etc as it is about the fsf,  who,among other things are trying to
> also enforce our licenses when they are infringed,  something individual
> users can't do easily.

Actually not, FSF may give advise on enforcement, but they may enforce
only those infringements that are related to FSF, where FSF have
copyrights, and not where other authors have copyrights.


Jean

Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns

In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/

___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


About GNU Social and FSF/GNU Project influence since 10 years

2022-04-27 Thread Jean Louis
* Jacob Hrbek  [2022-04-26 23:49]:
> I second that, what's so difficult on making a blog post for people to
> spread across social media so that people leaving twitter know about libre
> alternatives?

The only wrong thing is that you post that without knowing that it was
the FSF and GNU project who promoted decentralized WWW social networks
similar to Twitter.

So please research better, stop the rumors, and publishing whatever
uncertainties without research.

GNU social
https://www.gnu.org/software/social/

GNU social — a free software social networking platform
https://gnusocial.network/

GNU Network Services
https://gnu.io/

Now is how long time already? Almost 10 years -- and you come up with
information how FSF is doing nothing.

The rolling stone effect is there, as after GNU Social many other
ActivityPub (standard) based software followed, and many free software
activists contributed to it.

Now, the decentralized network is developing by momentum and by people
who already know the cause.

The FSF and GNU Project initiative worked well and gave excellent
results. 

People promote their instances and other people follow. Thus it works well.

You are also free to promote how to install Pleroma or Mastodon or GNU
Social instances.

From my side:

https://gnusocial.club and https://pleroma.gnusocial.club -- so watch
how it works.


Jean

Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns

In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/



___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


Re: thank you elon musk

2022-04-27 Thread Yasuaki Kudo
You know, 'twitter' seems to be about tweeting or speaking, whatever that comes 
to your mind.

Can we have some kind of a reverse system that is more about listening and 
discovery?

Finding out what matters to people, who are allied with your current state of 
thinking, etc.  
I think this is also related to effective homepages and search engines - can we 
have homepage systems that are integrated with the accompanying search engines, 
so that we maximize our chances of understanding what others have in 
mind?Rather than just HTML, we make the whole thing built up from the ground so 
that content will be discovered and understood by interested parties. 

To function properly, this kind of system will have no advertisement or any 
form of influence or control, as that will add noise and make the system less 
effective.  It might be more compatible with federalism and democracy. 😄

As far as the buyout is concerned, my hunch is twitter is an uninteresting 
platform and billionaires can spend as much money as they wish as their latest 
vanity project - its relevance on society seems minimal? 

-Yasu


> On Apr 27, 2022, at 15:36, Paul Sutton via libreplanet-discuss 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 26/04/2022 20:38, Adrienne G. Thompson wrote:
>>Hi Thomas:
>>  If the FSF is not now going very hard on promoting Mastadon,
>>  they should never be trusted to anything right again.
>>Why take such a negative approach? Why not, instead, propose a campaign
>>to promote Mastodon? We are here to support the Free Software Movement
>>- a movement that relies on contributions beyond code.
>>Adrienne G. Thompson
>>Principal and Chief Code Artist, GNU C-Graph
> 
> I agree here,  Mastodon does need content, it has that to a point as I 
> subscribe to feeds from Sciencedaily for example,  but few people interact.  
> As far as I am aware people not exactly have long conversations on twitter 
> either.
> 
> There are several forums set up to facilitate discussions on how the 
> fediverse can move forward, I am part of both.
> 
> https://fediverse.town/
> https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/
> 
> As a platform,  or set of  platforms they can't move forward unless people 
> say what they want, and help promote.
> 
> we need to perhaps coordinate efforts so a post from the fsf is boosted by 
> the community,   for example.  but not over a period of wees but days or 
> hours in some cases.
> 
> I tend to avoid mastodon,  as there are more people on there who seem to be 
> anti vaccination, anti science and racist, so it doesn't help me,
> 
> Free software is just as much about the community of developers,  users,  
> creators etc as it is about the fsf,  who,among other things are trying to 
> also enforce our licenses when they are infringed,  something individual 
> users can't do easily.
> 
> Paul
> ___
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


OpenPGP_signature
Description: Binary data
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


Re: thank you elon musk

2022-04-27 Thread Jean Louis
* Thomas Lord  [2022-04-26 23:50]:
> My tone is harsh because of decades of the FSF doing less and less
> of value in line with its mission.

Your statements only bring uncertainties. It seems there is no
research from your side. 

On what criteria are you basing such statements?

Did you maybe review financial statements? If no -- how are you
analyzing things? 

Is it maybe just by reaction? Like you think of something, and react
badly, and that is your analysis?

How does it work on your side?




Jean

Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns

In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/

___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


Re: thank you elon musk

2022-04-27 Thread Jean Louis
* Thomas Lord  [2022-04-26 21:21]:
> 
> Why is this hard?
> 
> A lot of serious people are now looking for an exit from twitter.
> 
> The ones I see are asking about Mastadon.
> 
> The FSF front page is a bunch of dust stuff about libreplanet,
> and they evince no concerted, organized activity to stand up
> instances and education materials -- to move people to Mastadon.

It was the GNU project with the FSF that initiated promotion of
decentralized and free software social networks with GNU Social.

GNU social
https://www.gnu.org/software/social/

GNU social — a free software social networking platform
https://gnusocial.network/

Mastodon followed thereafter, and it is not the only software under
same standard. Look at Pleroma:

Pleroma / pleroma · GitLab
https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma

And that is good effect, the rolling ball effect, and it is due to FSF
and GNU Project.

> Why else do they exist?  It is not enough to "have a position"
> on twitter.  Get to the barricades.

It is already so, and people are opening instances. Mastodon is not
GNU or FSF project but is result of the initiatives as given by FSF
and GNU -- and initiatives are obviously successful.

Please give credits where due.

Research the history of decentralized Twitter-like software.

> I have long been troubled that FSF has devolved to the kind of
> NPO that exists mainly to provide jobs for the people who
> operate it, and not to serve a useful social function.

Please, minimize that kind of rumors. I can't even take you seriously.

Jean

Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns

In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/

___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss