Re: Domain Registrar to Recommend

2022-05-20 Thread vidak
On 2022-05-20 19:17, andrew via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
> Uh, the point of my project is to teach people to rely on less
> outsourcing their computing, generally avoiding letting others host
> things for you...  which would be a problem.
> 
> The FSF uses Gandi, which seems to provide a basic interface without
> JavaScript, though!
> 

For what it's worth, I have used Gandi for many years.

Highly recommend, although domain registrars are just parasites 藍

Vidak.


> ___
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


Re: A mathematical, non-corruptable, algorithmic, democratic and free system of government and society

2022-01-13 Thread vidak
e impressions in the US :P)
> 
> For a government to be able to handle social needs, it must not be
> corruputed.  Theories such as the separation of powers exist, but in
> contemperory times, implementations such as the US have
> sometimes-corrupt but almost always ineffective governments.  The Senate
> fillibuster is a important reason, but not the culprit.  The culprit is
> the inherent eager to compete with other political parties and to gain a
> political advantage, rather than coorporating, working together, and
> actually managing the country with decent manners.
> 
> Humanity's system of managing society progressed from the rule of
> monarchs to the rule of law.  But laws can be unclear and
> misinterpreted.  The recent development of mathematics and computer
> science may as well be utilized to create a system of society and
> government, which algorithmicly distributes power in an explicit manner
> (Maybe with something like monads, I haven't got into the mathematical
> part yet.)
> 
> Godel Incompleteness tells us that we can never make a system of
> mathematics that gets understood the same way everywhere; math is also
> an evolving field (albeit very slowly).  If this (currently nil) system
> is to be ever used anywhere (may be the island), we'll definitely find a
> lot of fissues.  In such a system we also have the burden of educating
> people in abstract algebra, which is relatively easy compared to
> developing the system itself.  My intuition tells me that Group Theory
> will come in handy, but that's just intuition.
> 
> Currently, I host this project at [2].  I've only recently gotten into
> Group Theory and abstract algebra, it may take time for us all to come
> up with ideas.  But it's worth trying.
> 
> References
> ==
> 
> [1] 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2021-10/msg00011.html
> My previous memo on the use of software in education, COVID-19 and
> the courts.
> 
> Ironically, I was still using GitHub at the time.  I recently
> deprecated all of my GitHub in a notice, and moved all of my current
> projects to git.andrewyu.org and project.andrewyu.org.  The avenir
> repository is moving there some time, after I re-write the website
> with plain HTML---I don't see a reason to use a static site
> generator anymore.  This GitHub link is not provided here.
> 
> [2] https://project.andrewyu.org/libresociety
> A "checked out" version of the repository.  The PDFs are of primary
> interest.
> 
> git://git.andrewyu.org/libresociety
> The repository itself.  SSH protocol version also exist, described
> in the PDF itself.
> 
> https://notabug.org/andrewyu/libresociety
> A mirror of the above repository.  Links Out
> =
> 
> [a] https://stallman.org/there-ought-to-be-a-law.html
> A collection of bills/laws "proposed" or agreed upon by Richard
> Stallman, mostly in support for a freer society, a less
> corrupt/corruptable government, public benefit, etc.  I don't agree
> with all of them, but many of these will be taken into account in
> this project.
> 
> Some of the thoughts I had during writing this memo will appear in the
> next commit of the project.
> 
> This memo probably contains spelling errors and odd context-hopping.
> When sitting down in front of my computer on the actual book, I'll be
> more careful, and have a notebook and a pencil in front of me to plot
> relation maps.  Please forgive me, a 13-year-old with an undeveloped
> brain from a non English-native country.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Andrew Yu 
> 
> :P
> 
> ___
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

Andrew,

Your email is warmly welcomed. I have had exactly the same thoughts
recently.

It is interesting to me because, and I have no shame in admitting this,
I am an anarchist. I see Free Software as a way to resist the State and
try and dissolve it completely.

I would highly recommend you go back to them and show them GNU Guix?
Maybe the point is moot now. Guix is _insanely_ advanced, and that's the
angle you could take to them--the perfect package manager has finally
been built. To my mind, we've now perfectly solved the problem.

The way I look at the issue, though, is that the problem is with Statist
society in general. Hierarchical societies are not natural for humans,
so I maintain. I like GNU for its American sort of approach to this. I
don't share a lot of American culture, but GNU reminds me of Henry David
Thoreau's famous epithet: "the best government is that which governs
least of all, that is to say: not at all".

I come from an anarcho-communist approach. Perhaps we should have a
discussion about attracting attention to the radical elements of GNU--we
could convince people to join on that basis?

Anyway, I have gone on far too long.

Awesome to read your email (:

~vidak

https://zoinks.one/vidak

___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


Re: federated free software movement

2021-11-15 Thread vidak
On 2021-11-14 10:03, Arthur Torrey wrote:
> I think that this would be a really good idea, as I see a great deal
> of overlap between the motivations and ideals of the groups...  It
> might also be worth reaching out to the 'maker' world as well since it
> also has a lot of overlap  I don't do Bird-noises or Mastodon, but
> think it is a good idea in principle.

I have been thinking for some time on trying to revive a 'flagship' Free
Software federated social media. I hate the concept of 'social media'
with all the attention-economy aspects that it brings with it. But, I
think ActivityPub has succeeded as the protocol of choice for federated
online microblogging.

Perhaps this could broaden even further into a reconceptualisation of a
'Free hypertext', but I think that's beyond the scope of this
discussion.
 
> I think the only thing that might be an issue where the groups might
> need to have a significant level of willingness to compromise is on
> the 'purity requirements' (for lack of a better term)  I.e. both the
> OSHW and R2R folks don't necessarily have big issues w/ using
> proprietary software / binary blobs if it makes it possible to
> accomplish their ends of making cool objects (i.e. a gizmo that is
> based on a RasPI) or fixing a device (i.e using a Windows based
> proprietary programming tool)...  So while pointing out how Free
> software might make it easier to make / fix things, the FLOSS
> enthusiasts would need to not be hostile to the idea using software
> that we don't approve of...  This is sort of like my comment that the
> RYF cert would be more popular / desirable if it didn't prohibit
> mentioning compatibility w/ other non-free O/S's...

Personally, the issue isn't with 'purity', it's with 'compromise'.
Purity doesn't exclude variety, and it certainly doesn't indicate
group-think, to my mind. I don't even phrase the concept of only using
Free software as one of being 'pure'--when there are many options and
solutions that are already 'Free', why can't you always choose the right
choice?

> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 14:29:30 +
> From: Leah Rowe 
> To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> Subject: federated free software movement
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
> 
> 
> What if there was a combined Free Software, OSHW and Right to Repair 
> group, providing ideological leadership in a peer to peer fashion via 
> federated services (including Git-based code hosting) and an emphasis on 
> teaching how to self-host your own federated hosting infrastructure?
>  

I'd definitely be down to help do some leg-work on this. I'd like to
revive total 'Free software' solutions, even put some development, into,
say, GNU Social?

> --
> Arthur Torrey - 
> ---
> 
> ___
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss


Re: Linux distro chooser

2021-11-15 Thread vidak
=> distro picker always points to GNU Guix (:

On 2021-10-29 12:48, Jean Louis wrote:

> stuff

___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss