Re: The endless thread without benefit - Re: re. RMS

2021-04-12 Thread Jean Louis
* Adonay Felipe Nogueira via libreplanet-discuss
 [2021-04-09 16:36]>

> I know that it also depends on the font size, since for example,
> visually impaired people (e.g.: with monocular vision) have to
> either use a text-to-speech software or rely on a setting to enlarge
> only the text font size for the entire system, which also changes
> how much width an email client has to decide if it will use an
> horizontal scroll bar or do a soft line wrap. Avoiding such arts not
> only helps visually impaired but also leaves more space to convey
> other messages.

Reason why somebody cannot see proper order of letters is that they
view email as HTML which uses fonts that are not of equal width, that
is why it comes out misaligned.

I do believe helping visually impaired or hearing impaired or
otherwise impaired users should be assisted by computer software. We
do not have much of it available really.

> This is why I particularly don't find text art useful in text-based
> communications, specialy when there is a chance that a blind person
> is viewing it (since they have hard time understanding “:)” and
> “:relaxed:” since these aren't localized to their language, but “☺”
> is).

Maybe there is no standard language for all the world.

And if that person can hear, it is easy to ask a friend.

There was a man who was alwayas in wheelchair, he had no problem
associating with anybody and directing teenagers to lift him, move him
up the stairs and similar. 

I also believe that blind literate persons may be way more attentive
and prone to understand than a non-blind one that consciously or
unconsciously pretend to be apt to understand.

Experience from a project to help people communicate better and safer
by using free software applications tells me that majority of people
who can read, who did face the project, cannot read. This relates to
one particular group of 1000+ people in East Africa. They can read in
the sense that they can understand letters and read some words, and
understand many words, but understanding it really is hard for
majority, though they may be English speakers in physical real
life. Majority of those English speakers never read a book like Tom
Sawyer, or any other popular English book, unspoken of reading popular
books, or comics, books almost do not exist and there is no habit in
society and families to read books. This makes one large number of
people impaired to read though they do speak the language and
occasionally write it in the SMS.

That is why each reader application shall have direct access to local
dictionary, from each single word wherever possible, each editor
should have possibility to access dictionary from each word. GNU Emacs
has recently inclued M-x dictionary command that helps users to find
definitions for words, and there are many other packages.



Jean

Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns

Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman
https://rms-support-letter.github.io/


___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

Re: The endless thread without benefit - Re: re. RMS

2021-04-09 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira via libreplanet-discuss
Em 07/04/2021 03:24, Danny Spitzberg escreveu:
>It may be my email client or my eyes but I cannot decipher this ascii
>art. Accessibility standards would implore you to please also include a
>plain text translation.
>[…]
>  / ___| _   _ _ __  _ __   ___  _ __| |_  |  _ \|  \/  / ___|
>  \___ \| | | | '_ \| '_ \ / _ \| '__| __| | |_) | |\/| \___ \
>   ___) | |_| | |_) | |_) | (_) | |  | |_  |  _ <| |  | |___) |
>  |/ \__,_| .__/| .__/ \___/|_|   \__| |_| \_\_|  |_|/
>  |_|   |_|
> 
>What does this ^ say?
I know that it also depends on the font size, since for example, visually 
impaired people (e.g.: with monocular vision) have to either use a 
text-to-speech software or rely on a setting to enlarge only the text font size 
for the entire system, which also changes how much width an email client has to 
decide if it will use an horizontal scroll bar or do a soft line wrap. Avoiding 
such arts not only helps visually impaired but also leaves more space to convey 
other messages.

This is why I particularly don't find text art useful in text-based 
communications, specialy when there is a chance that a blind person is viewing 
it (since they have hard time understanding “:)” and “:relaxed:” since these 
aren't localized to their language, but “☺” is).

That said, the text art says: support RMS.


-- 
* Ativista do software livre
* https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno
* Membro dos grupos avaliadores de
* Software (Free Software Directory)
* Distribuições de sistemas (FreedSoftware)
* Sites (Free JavaScript Action Team)
* Não sou advogado e não fomento os não livres
* Sempre veja o spam/lixo eletrônico do teu e-mail
* Ou coloque todos os recebidos na caixa de entrada
* Sempre assino e-mails com OpenPGP
* Chave pública: vide endereço anterior
* Qualquer outro pode ser fraude
* Se não tens OpenPGP, ignore o anexo "signature.asc"
* Ao enviar anexos
* Docs., planilhas e apresentações: use OpenDocument
* Outros tipos: vide endereço anterior
* Use protocolos de comunicação federadas
* Vide endereço anterior
* Mensagens secretas somente via
* XMPP com OMEMO
* E-mail criptografado e assinado com OpenPGP



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

Re: The endless thread without benefit - Re: re. RMS

2021-04-08 Thread Danny Spitzberg
   It may be my email client or my eyes but I cannot decipher this ascii
   art. Accessibility standards would implore you to please also include a
   plain text translation.
   On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 12:22 PM Jean Louis  wrote:

 * Lori Nagel via libreplanet-discuss
 <[1]libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> [2021-04-05 19:32]:
 >I think a lot of this discussion about RMS is because most
 people
 >forget about freedom respecting software activism most of the
 time.
 >They don't live eat sleep and breathe it 24/7.  Every time a
 RMS news
 >article comes out, or he is embroiled in some controversy, then
 people
 >find the time and energy to gather on these lists and discuss
 him
 >again.  The only problem is, it doesn't necessarily lead to new
 and
 >more effective freedom respecting software advocacy strategies.
 Exactly.
     _   __  __ 
 / ___| _   _ _ __  _ __   ___  _ __| |_  |  _ \|  \/  / ___|
 \___ \| | | | '_ \| '_ \ / _ \| '__| __| | |_) | |\/| \___ \
  ___) | |_| | |_) | |_) | (_) | |  | |_  |  _ <| |  | |___) |
 |/ \__,_| .__/| .__/ \___/|_|   \__| |_| \_\_|  |_|/
 |_|   |_|

   What does this ^ say?

 Jean
 Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
 [2]https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
 Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman
 [3]https://rms-support-letter.github.io/
 ___
 libreplanet-discuss mailing list
 [4]libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
 [5]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discus
 s

References

   1. mailto:libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
   2. https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
   3. https://rms-support-letter.github.io/
   4. mailto:libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
   5. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

Re: The endless thread without benefit - Re: re. RMS

2021-04-08 Thread J Leslie Turriff

On 2021-04-05 11:45:46 Jean Louis wrote:
> * Lori Nagel via libreplanet-discuss  
> [2021-04-05
19:32]:
> >I think a lot of this discussion about RMS is because most people
> >forget about freedom respecting software activism most of the time.
> >They don't live eat sleep and breathe it 24/7.  Every time a RMS news
> >article comes out, or he is embroiled in some controversy, then people
> >find the time and energy to gather on these lists and discuss him
> >again.  The only problem is, it doesn't necessarily lead to new and
> >more effective freedom respecting software advocacy strategies.
>
> Exactly.

Well, I didn't subscribe (recently) to this list to listen to debates 
about RMS'
celebrity follies, so after I figured out what was going on, I've added an 
"Ignore
Thread" button to my mail agent's toolbar (just for this list!)

Leslie

--

___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

Re: The endless thread without benefit - Re: re. RMS

2021-04-08 Thread Jean Louis
* Danny Spitzberg  [2021-04-07 09:24]:
> It may be my email client or my eyes but I cannot decipher this ascii art.
> Accessibility standards would implore you to please also include a plain
> text translation.

Sorry.

Every email client should be able to read simple text, not only
HTML. I can read HTML with mutt, and text, or any kind of attachment.

> >     _   __  __ 
> > / ___| _   _ _ __  _ __   ___  _ __| |_  |  _ \|  \/  / ___|
> > \___ \| | | | '_ \| '_ \ / _ \| '__| __| | |_) | |\/| \___ \
> >  ___) | |_| | |_) | |_) | (_) | |  | |_  |  _ <| |  | |___) |
> > |/ \__,_| .__/| .__/ \___/|_|   \__| |_| \_\_|  |_|/
> > |_|   |_|
> >
> 
> What does this ^ say?

Here is the answer:

https://hyperscope.link/3/6/8/4/4/36844.html


-- 
Jean

Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns

Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman
https://rms-support-letter.github.io/


___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss

The endless thread without benefit - Re: re. RMS

2021-04-05 Thread Jean Louis
* Lori Nagel via libreplanet-discuss  
[2021-04-05 19:32]:
>I think a lot of this discussion about RMS is because most people
>forget about freedom respecting software activism most of the time.
>They don't live eat sleep and breathe it 24/7.  Every time a RMS news
>article comes out, or he is embroiled in some controversy, then people
>find the time and energy to gather on these lists and discuss him
>again.  The only problem is, it doesn't necessarily lead to new and
>more effective freedom respecting software advocacy strategies.

Exactly.

    _   __  __   
/ ___| _   _ _ __  _ __   ___  _ __| |_  |  _ \|  \/  / ___| 
\___ \| | | | '_ \| '_ \ / _ \| '__| __| | |_) | |\/| \___ \ 
 ___) | |_| | |_) | |_) | (_) | |  | |_  |  _ <| |  | |___) |
|/ \__,_| .__/| .__/ \___/|_|   \__| |_| \_\_|  |_|/ 
|_|   |_|
Jean

Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns

Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman
https://rms-support-letter.github.io/


___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss