Re: Potential bash 2.05 issues with 'set'
Tim == Tim Van Holder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tim Something like this, perhaps? For sure! ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: PATCH: Fix mips*-*-linux*
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:24:42AM -0500, Robert Boehne wrote: Hello, Here is the patch reworked for HEAD. If noone objects I'll commit it. ChangeLog Entry: 2001-10-23 H.J. Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ltmain.sh: Allow link against an archive when building a shared library. * libtool.m4 (lt_cv_deplibs_check_method): Always use file_magic for Linux ELF. IMHO, the whole lt_cv_deplibs_check_method stuff in libtool is all wrong, at least on ELF when building a shared library. The only thing you can put in dependency_libs=... in lib*.la is DSO. You should never, ever put an archive in it, at least not on ELF. H.J. ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: [Patch #41] Do all rm's in one command with --mode=clean
Hmm. I was having trouble trying to feed 'xargs' it's data without actually putting it all on a command-line at some point(silly, eh?). In any event, perhaps something like this will work: for each file ... $rmfiles=$rmfiles $some_files_to_delete ... if 100 -l $rmfiles then $show $rm $rmfiles $run $rm || exit_status=1 $rmfiles= fi done if test -n $rmfiles; then $show $rm $rmfiles $run $rm || exit_status=1 $rmfiles= fi Is there a less random number than 100, that would be a reasonable minimum? -jeff ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: Potential bash 2.05 issues with 'set'
Tim == Tim Van Holder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tim Something like this, perhaps? For sure! OK - installed (this may be resolved in bash 2.06; if so, I'll try to remember to amend this entry accordingly). ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
