so many failed tests
This is on Solaris2.6 using gcc3.2.1 and gnu ld (binutils 2.13.1), and the latest automake and autoconf packages as of Nov. 29. I unpacked libtool-1.4.3, and ran ./configure; gmake. The build seemed to proceed without error, but when I ran make check, MANY tests failed: = 21 of 83 tests failed =(some of the failed tests are listed below) Is there some problem? How to fix? Please CC as I am not on the list. henry nelson FAIL: demo-inst.test FAIL: deplibs.test FAIL: demo-inst.test FAIL: deplibs.test FAIL: depdemo-exec.test FAIL: depdemo-inst.test FAIL: depdemo-inst.test FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: demo-inst.test FAIL: depdemo-inst.test FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: demo-inst.test FAIL: build-relink.test FAIL: depdemo-exec.test FAIL: depdemo-inst.test FAIL: build-relink2.test FAIL: mdemo-exec.test FAIL: mdemo-inst.test ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
[Bug] CC="gcc -someoption" loses the -someoption in untagged configuration (Works for tagged configuration)
Hi - Subject says it all, really. The -someoption isn't present in the untagged CC= in the generated libtool. (In is in LTCC=, incidentally.) All works ok with a tagged (e.g. CXX) configuration. I've been working around this with this adhoc patch - mostly created by educated guessing than a true understanding of the libtool code. Max. --- /usr/autotool/devel/share/aclocal/libtool.m4.orig 2002-12-04 22:12:47.0 + +++ /usr/autotool/devel/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 2002-12-04 22:15:10.0 + @@ -2295,6 +2295,9 @@ _LT_AC_SYS_COMPILER +# Allow CC to be a program name with arguments. +_LT_AC_TAGVAR(compiler, $1)="$CC" + # # Check for any special shared library compilation flags. # ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Ponudba skuterjev na obroke
Title: POSEBNA PONUDBA V posebni ponudbi imamo omejeno kolièino skuterjev Benelli letnik 2001 po izjemno ugodnih cenah. Benelli 491 ST / Benelli K2 Cena na obroke: e za 29.990,00 SIT z DDV na mesec, 12 mesecev trajnik NLB, brez pologa Cena za gotovino: 330.000,00 SIT z DDV Tehnièni podatki: 50ccm3, 2 kw, zraèno hlajen cilinder, tea: 85 kg Auto Performance d.o.o. Notranja in zunanja trgovina, proizvodnja in zastopstva PE marca, Kamnika 25, 1241 Kamnik, Slovenija Tel: 01 830 82 74, 01 830 82 75 Fax: 01 830 82 73 Veè informacij in ostala ponudba na spletni strani www.autoperformance.si e-pota: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Odjava: V kolikor ne elite prejemati nadaljnih obvestil kliknite tukaj in poljite sporoèilo... ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: no AIX 5 support? I've got some idea what's needed.
* Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-03 06:46:15 -0500]: > Mats Rynge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Also, make sure that you have libtool-1.4.3 > > Can you list any improvements specific to AIX in libtool-1.4.3 > (compared with libtool-1.4.2)? >From the ChangeLog: * libtool.m4: When a module is built for AIX, the 'lib' prefix isn't needed, neither is the version. AIX dlopen will honor the RPATH in a library. * libtool.m4: If ld is being used on IRIX to embed the runtmie path, use -rpath, not -Wl,-rpath. Embed the runtime path into libraries for AIX (supported on AIX 4.3.2+). Embed the runtime path into Tru64 libraries, even though it doesn't make much sense unless using Tru64 UNIX 5.1 with a specific patch and >5.1. * libtool.m4 (aix): When LDFLAGS="-Wl,-brtl,[other options]", the "-brtl" special-case code for AIX never gets triggered because were are being too specific about how we search for "-brtl". Use case statement to avoid this. Remove extraneous semicolon. Especially the last one help me a lot. -- Mats Rynge AIX PDSLIB -- http://aixpdslib.seas.ucla.edu ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: no AIX 5 support? I've got some idea what's needed.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:21:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > That seems rather odd to me. -G is a linker flag, and no matter > which compiler you use, the AIX ld command is what is eventually invoked. libtool probably assumes that "gcc -shared" will "do the right thing". I don't think GCC knows how to create -brtl-style shared libraries on AIX. Looking at libtool.m4, when GCC is used, -G is *not* added. > Dan > > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 3 05:38:03 2002 > > > > I've seen reports from Apache-2.0+AIX users that -G isn't added with > > gcc, but I see it added with xlc_r. By any chance is that something > > you can confirm or deny? > > > > > ___ > Libtool mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
