Re: [libvirt] libvirtd not responding to virsh, results in virsh hanging
On 03/31/2017 11:30 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 03/31/2017 11:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: I ran tcpdump looking for TCP traffic between the two libvirtd processes, and was unable to see any after several minutes. So it doesn't look like there is any regular keepalive messaging going on (/etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf doesn't specify any keepalive settings so we'd be using the defaults I think). And yet the TCP connection is stuck open. Turns out I ran tcpdump in the wrong windowoops. There's what appears to be a keepalive sequence every 5 seconds. I still don't understand why the connection wasn't taken down when qemu exited on the destination host. One final update for nowI attached gdb to libvirtd on the source host and then killed libvirtd on the destination host. I saw the TCP connection get closed down, and gdb showed this: [Thread 0x7f8948ab3700 (LWP 4514) exited] At this point "virsh" commands on the source host work as expected, it's no longer hung. So it appears we have a number of factors contributing to the hang: 1) failure of migration in qemu 2) connection between hosts not getting torn down when migration fails 3) the libvirtd thread managing the migration on the source side appears to be sleeping indefinitely while holding a resource of some sort which causes the apparent hang when we try to do other operations Chris -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] libvirtd not responding to virsh, results in virsh hanging -- correction
On 03/31/2017 11:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: I ran tcpdump looking for TCP traffic between the two libvirtd processes, and was unable to see any after several minutes. So it doesn't look like there is any regular keepalive messaging going on (/etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf doesn't specify any keepalive settings so we'd be using the defaults I think). And yet the TCP connection is stuck open. Turns out I ran tcpdump in the wrong windowoops. There's what appears to be a keepalive sequence every 5 seconds. I still don't understand why the connection wasn't taken down when qemu exited on the destination host. Chris -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Re: [libvirt] libvirtd not responding to virsh, results in virsh hanging
Hi, I finally got a chance to take another look at this issue. We've reproduced it in another test lab. New information below. On 03/18/2017 12:41 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 17.03.2017 23:21, Chris Friesen wrote: Hi, We've recently run into an issue with libvirt 1.2.17 in the context of an OpenStack deployment. Let me just say that 1.2.17 is rather old libvirt. Can you try with one of the latests one to see whether the bug still reproduces? Difficult, the version seems likely to be part of the problem. We haven't seen this issue with migrations between hosts with libvirtd 1.2.17 or between hosts with libvirtd 2.0.0, just when the versions are mismatched. The issue occurs when we are trying to do an in-service upgrade, so the source host is running libvirt 1.2.17 and we're trying to live-migrate to a dest host that has been upgraded to libvirt 2.0.0. Interestingly, the issue doesn't always happen, it's intermittent. We recently reproduced it on the fourth guest we live-migrated from the "old" host to the "new" host--the first three migrated without difficulty. (And the first three were configured very closely to the fourth...boot from iscsi, same number/type of NICs, same amount of vCPUs/RAM, same topology, etc.) To answer a previous question, yes we're doing tunneled migration in this case. Interestingly, when I hit "c" to continue in the debugger, I got this: (gdb) c Continuing. Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe. [Switching to Thread 0x7f0573fff700 (LWP 186865)] 0x7f05b5cbb1cd in write () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (gdb) c Continuing. [Thread 0x7f0573fff700 (LWP 186865) exited] (gdb) quit A debugging session is active. Inferior 1 [process 37471] will be detached. Quit anyway? (y or n) y Detaching from program: /usr/sbin/libvirtd, process 37471 This is becasue there might be some keep alive going on. Introduced in 0.9.8, libvirt has keepalive mechanism in place (repeatedly sending ping/pong between client & server). Now, should 5 subsequent pings get lost (this is configurable of course) libvirt thinks the connection is broken and closes it. If you attach a debugger to libvirt, the whole daemon is paused, among with the event loop so server cannot reply to client's pings which in turn makes client think the connection is broken. Thus it closes the connection which is observed as broken pipe in the daemon. I've reproduced the issue in another test lab, in this case compute-2 is the "old" host while compute-0 and compute-1 are the "new" hosts. Three guests have live-migrated from compute-2 to compute-0, and a fourth appears to be stuck in-progress, but libvirtd is hung so any "virsh" commands also hang. Running "netstat -apn |grep libvirtd" shows an open connection between compute-2 (192.168.205.134) and compute-0 (192.168.205.24). Presumably this corresponds to the migration that appears to be "stuck" in progress. compute-2:/home/wrsroot# netstat -atpn|grep libvirtd tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:16509 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 35787/libvirtd tcp0 0 192.168.205.134:51760 192.168.205.24:16509ESTABLISHED 35787/libvirtd tcp6 0 0 :::16509:::*LISTEN 35787/libvirtd Running "virsh list" on compute-0 shows 9 guests, which agrees with the number of running "qemu-kvm" processes. Interestingly, the guest from the migration with an open connection in libvirtd is *not* running and doesn't show up in the "virsh list" output. The /var/log/libvirt/qemu/instance-000e.log file on compute-0 corresponds to the instance that libvirtd is "stuck" migrating, and it ends with these lines: 2017-03-29T06:38:37.886940Z qemu-kvm: VQ 2 size 0x80 < last_avail_idx 0x47b - used_idx 0x47c 2017-03-29T06:38:37.886974Z qemu-kvm: error while loading state for instance 0x0 of device ':00:07.0/virtio-balloon' 2017-03-29T06:38:37.888684Z qemu-kvm: load of migration failed: Operation not permitted 2017-03-29 06:38:37.896+: shutting down I think this implies a qemu incompatibility of some sort between the different qemu versions on the "old" and "new" hosts, but it doesn't explain why libvirtd didn't close down the migration connection between the two hosts. The corresponding libvirtd logs on compute-0 are: 2017-03-29T06:38:35.000 401: warning : qemuDomainObjTaint:3580 : Domain id=10 name='instance-000e' uuid=57ae849f-aa66-422a-90a2-62db6c59db29 is tainted: high-privileges 2017-03-29T06:38:37.000 49075: error : qemuMonitorIO:695 : internal error: End of file from monitor 2017-03-29T06:38:37.000 49075: error : qemuProcessReportLogError:1810 : internal error: qemu unexpectedly closed the monitor: EAL:eal_memory.c:1591: WARNING: Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) is enabled in the kernel. EAL:eal_memory.c:1593:This may cause issues with mapping memory into secondary processes 2017-03-29T06:38:37.886940Z qemu-kvm: VQ 2 size 0x80 < last_ava
Re: [libvirt] libvirtd not responding to virsh, results in virsh hanging
On 17.03.2017 23:21, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hi, > > We've recently run into an issue with libvirt 1.2.17 in the context of > an OpenStack deployment. > Let me just say that 1.2.17 is rather old libvirt. Can you try with one of the latests one to see whether the bug still reproduces? > Occasionally after doing live migrations from a compute node with > libvirt 1.2.17 to a compute node with libvirt 2.0.0 we see libvirtd on > the 1.2.17 side stop responding. When this happens, if you run a > command like "sudo virsh list" then it just hangs waiting for a response > from libvirtd. > > Running "ps -elfT|grep libvirtd" shows many threads waiting on a futex, > but two threads in poll_schedule_timeout() as part of the poll() > syscall. On a non-hung libvirtd I only see one thread in > poll_schedule_timeout(). So looks like libvirt is waiting for something. > > If I kill and restart libvirtd (this took two tries, it didn't actually > die the first time) then the problem seems to go away. > > I just tried attaching gdb to the "hung" libvirtd process and running > "thread apply all backtrace". This printed backtraces for the threads, > including the one that was apparently stuck in poll(): > > Thread 17 (Thread 0x7f0573fff700 (LWP 186865)): > #0 0x7f05b59d769d in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > #1 0x7f05b7f01b9a in virNetClientIOEventLoop () from > /lib64/libvirt.so.0 > #2 0x7f05b7f0234b in virNetClientSendInternal () from > /lib64/libvirt.so.0 > #3 0x7f05b7f036f3 in virNetClientSendWithReply () from > /lib64/libvirt.so.0 > #4 0x7f05b7f04eb3 in virNetClientStreamSendPacket () from > /lib64/libvirt.so.0 > #5 0x7f05b7ed8db5 in remoteStreamFinish () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 > #6 0x7f05b7ec7eaa in virStreamFinish () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 > #7 0x7f059bd9323d in qemuMigrationIOFunc () from > /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_qemu.so > #8 0x7f05b7e09aa2 in virThreadHelper () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 > #9 0x7f05b5cb4dc5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 > #10 0x7f05b59e1ced in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 This means that libvirt is trying to finish the migration stream (which happens on the end of the migration process), but the client socket is not writable. So perhaps client is broken? Or the connection got interrupted? > > > Interestingly, when I hit "c" to continue in the debugger, I got this: > > (gdb) c > Continuing. > > Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe. > [Switching to Thread 0x7f0573fff700 (LWP 186865)] > 0x7f05b5cbb1cd in write () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 > (gdb) c > Continuing. > [Thread 0x7f0573fff700 (LWP 186865) exited] > (gdb) quit > A debugging session is active. > > Inferior 1 [process 37471] will be detached. > > Quit anyway? (y or n) y > Detaching from program: /usr/sbin/libvirtd, process 37471 > This is becasue there might be some keep alive going on. Introduced in 0.9.8, libvirt has keepalive mechanism in place (repeatedly sending ping/pong between client & server). Now, should 5 subsequent pings get lost (this is configurable of course) libvirt thinks the connection is broken and closes it. If you attach a debugger to libvirt, the whole daemon is paused, among with the event loop so server cannot reply to client's pings which in turn makes client think the connection is broken. Thus it closes the connection which is observed as broken pipe in the daemon. > > Now thread 186865 seems to be gone, and libvirtd is no longer hung. > > Has anyone seen anything like this before? Anyone have an idea where to > start looking? I'd say logs. We need to find out where the problem actually occurs. Whether it is one side of the migration (I bet on destination), or perhaps virsh itself (you're doing tunnelled migration?). Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
[libvirt] libvirtd not responding to virsh, results in virsh hanging
Hi, We've recently run into an issue with libvirt 1.2.17 in the context of an OpenStack deployment. Occasionally after doing live migrations from a compute node with libvirt 1.2.17 to a compute node with libvirt 2.0.0 we see libvirtd on the 1.2.17 side stop responding. When this happens, if you run a command like "sudo virsh list" then it just hangs waiting for a response from libvirtd. Running "ps -elfT|grep libvirtd" shows many threads waiting on a futex, but two threads in poll_schedule_timeout() as part of the poll() syscall. On a non-hung libvirtd I only see one thread in poll_schedule_timeout(). If I kill and restart libvirtd (this took two tries, it didn't actually die the first time) then the problem seems to go away. I just tried attaching gdb to the "hung" libvirtd process and running "thread apply all backtrace". This printed backtraces for the threads, including the one that was apparently stuck in poll(): Thread 17 (Thread 0x7f0573fff700 (LWP 186865)): #0 0x7f05b59d769d in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x7f05b7f01b9a in virNetClientIOEventLoop () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 #2 0x7f05b7f0234b in virNetClientSendInternal () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 #3 0x7f05b7f036f3 in virNetClientSendWithReply () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 #4 0x7f05b7f04eb3 in virNetClientStreamSendPacket () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 #5 0x7f05b7ed8db5 in remoteStreamFinish () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 #6 0x7f05b7ec7eaa in virStreamFinish () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 #7 0x7f059bd9323d in qemuMigrationIOFunc () from /usr/lib64/libvirt/connection-driver/libvirt_driver_qemu.so #8 0x7f05b7e09aa2 in virThreadHelper () from /lib64/libvirt.so.0 #9 0x7f05b5cb4dc5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #10 0x7f05b59e1ced in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 Interestingly, when I hit "c" to continue in the debugger, I got this: (gdb) c Continuing. Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe. [Switching to Thread 0x7f0573fff700 (LWP 186865)] 0x7f05b5cbb1cd in write () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (gdb) c Continuing. [Thread 0x7f0573fff700 (LWP 186865) exited] (gdb) quit A debugging session is active. Inferior 1 [process 37471] will be detached. Quit anyway? (y or n) y Detaching from program: /usr/sbin/libvirtd, process 37471 Now thread 186865 seems to be gone, and libvirtd is no longer hung. Has anyone seen anything like this before? Anyone have an idea where to start looking? Thanks, Chris -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
