Re: [libvirt] ruby-libvirt mixed storage migration

[Chris Lalancette]

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Tim Förster - Hetzner Online AG <
tim.foers...@hetzner.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> rebuilding the gem is not quite easy. I am not able to find the actual
> gemspec. There are also some
>

The gemspec is in the git repository.  You should be able to clone git://
libvirt.org/ruby-libvirt.git, then run "rake gem" to get a new gem.


> missing features, which are available though virsh. Such as 'virsh
> domblklist' to find out the
> actual registered block targets or rate limiting with iotune the burst
> iops.
>
>
ruby-libvirt aims to expose the libvirt API through ruby, not the virsh
API.  Sometimes virsh provides additional functionality on top of the
libvirt API, which will not necessarily be implemented in ruby-libvirt.  In
this particular case, virsh domblklist parses virDomainGetXMLDesc() to
output a list of block devices.  virDomainGetXMLDesc() is supported by
ruby-libvirt, but domblklist itself would not be.  That being said, it
should be fairly straightforward to implement it in ruby by first calling
dom.xml_desc(), and then parsing the output with your favorite ruby XML
parsing library.

Chris
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Re: [libvirt] ruby-libvirt mixed storage migration

[Tim Förster - Hetzner Online AG]

Hi,

rebuilding the gem is not quite easy. I am not able to find the actual gemspec. 
There are also some
missing features, which are available though virsh. Such as 'virsh domblklist' 
to find out the
actual registered block targets or rate limiting with iotune the burst iops.

tim

Am 07.03.2016 um 15:52 schrieb Chris Lalancette:
> Hi there,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Tim Förster - Hetzner Online AG 
>  > wrote:
> 
> Heyho guys,
> 
> is there any reason why mixed storage migration is restriced. I am unable 
> to serve parameter
> "migrate_disks" through #migrate_to_uri3. It looks like there is a 
> missing macro here.
> 
> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=ruby-libvirt.git;a=blob;f=ext/libvirt/domain.c#l3858.
>  Could you please
> verify this?
> 
> 
> This is probably one of those enums I just haven't gotten to yet.  I can look 
> at implementing it for
> the next release.  Note, though, that all of these fields are integers, so as 
> a temporary workaround
> you should be able to just use the correct number.
> 
> Chris



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Re: [libvirt] ruby-libvirt mixed storage migration

[Chris Lalancette]

Hi there,

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Tim Förster - Hetzner Online AG <
tim.foers...@hetzner.de> wrote:

> Heyho guys,
>
> is there any reason why mixed storage migration is restriced. I am unable
> to serve parameter
> "migrate_disks" through #migrate_to_uri3. It looks like there is a missing
> macro here.
>
> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=ruby-libvirt.git;a=blob;f=ext/libvirt/domain.c#l3858.
> Could you please
> verify this?
>

This is probably one of those enums I just haven't gotten to yet.  I can
look at implementing it for the next release.  Note, though, that all of
these fields are integers, so as a temporary workaround you should be able
to just use the correct number.

Chris
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[libvirt] ruby-libvirt mixed storage migration

[Tim Förster - Hetzner Online AG]

Heyho guys,

is there any reason why mixed storage migration is restriced. I am unable to 
serve parameter
"migrate_disks" through #migrate_to_uri3. It looks like there is a missing 
macro here.
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=ruby-libvirt.git;a=blob;f=ext/libvirt/domain.c#l3858. 
Could you please
verify this?

regrads,

tim




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list