On 10/07/2018 03:00 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> Separate out the fetch of the IOThread monitor call into a separate
> helper so that a subsequent domain statistics change can fetch the raw
> IOThread data and parse it as it sees fit.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 59 --
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> index ef87a6ef05..e0edb43557 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> @@ -5486,20 +5486,18 @@ qemuDomainGetMaxVcpus(virDomainPtr dom)
> VIR_DOMAIN_VCPU_MAXIMUM));
> }
>
> +
> static int
> -qemuDomainGetIOThreadsLive(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
> - virDomainObjPtr vm,
> - virDomainIOThreadInfoPtr **info)
> +qemuDomainGetIOThreadsMon(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
> + virDomainObjPtr vm,
> + qemuMonitorIOThreadInfoPtr **iothreads)
> {
> qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv;
> -qemuMonitorIOThreadInfoPtr *iothreads = NULL;
> -virDomainIOThreadInfoPtr *info_ret = NULL;
> int niothreads = 0;
> -size_t i;
> int ret = -1;
>
> if (qemuDomainObjBeginJob(driver, vm, QEMU_JOB_QUERY) < 0)
> -goto cleanup;
> +return -1;
>
> if (!virDomainObjIsActive(vm)) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID, "%s",
> @@ -5515,46 +5513,57 @@ qemuDomainGetIOThreadsLive(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
> }
>
> qemuDomainObjEnterMonitor(driver, vm);
> -niothreads = qemuMonitorGetIOThreads(priv->mon, );
> -if (qemuDomainObjExitMonitor(driver, vm) < 0)
> -goto endjob;
> -if (niothreads < 0)
> +niothreads = qemuMonitorGetIOThreads(priv->mon, iothreads);
> +if (qemuDomainObjExitMonitor(driver, vm) < 0 || niothreads < 0)
> goto endjob;
>
> -/* Nothing to do */
> -if (niothreads == 0) {
> -ret = 0;
> -goto endjob;
> -}
> +ret = niothreads;
> +
> + endjob:
> +qemuDomainObjEndJob(driver, vm);
> +
> +return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int
> +qemuDomainGetIOThreadsLive(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
> + virDomainObjPtr vm,
> + virDomainIOThreadInfoPtr **info)
> +{
> +qemuMonitorIOThreadInfoPtr *iothreads = NULL;
> +virDomainIOThreadInfoPtr *info_ret = NULL;
> +int niothreads;
> +size_t i;
> +int ret = -1;
> +
> +if ((niothreads = qemuDomainGetIOThreadsMon(driver, vm, )) <=
> 0)
> +return niothreads;
>
> if (VIR_ALLOC_N(info_ret, niothreads) < 0)
> -goto endjob;
> +goto cleanup;
>
> for (i = 0; i < niothreads; i++) {
> virBitmapPtr map = NULL;
>
> if (VIR_ALLOC(info_ret[i]) < 0)
> -goto endjob;
> +goto cleanup;
> info_ret[i]->iothread_id = iothreads[i]->iothread_id;
>
> if (!(map = virProcessGetAffinity(iothreads[i]->thread_id)))
> -goto endjob;
> +goto cleanup;
I don't think this is a good idea. GetAffinity should be inside job too.
SetAffinity call inside PinIOThread is inside one.
Probably doesn't hurt us right now since the domain object is locked
here, but regardless I think it should be inside a job.
The split into two functions looks okay.
>
> if (virBitmapToData(map, _ret[i]->cpumap,
> _ret[i]->cpumaplen) < 0) {
> virBitmapFree(map);
> -goto endjob;
> +goto cleanup;
> }
> virBitmapFree(map);
> }
>
> -*info = info_ret;
> -info_ret = NULL;
> +VIR_STEAL_PTR(*info, info_ret);
> ret = niothreads;
>
> - endjob:
> -qemuDomainObjEndJob(driver, vm);
> -
> cleanup:
> if (info_ret) {
> for (i = 0; i < niothreads; i++)
>
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
