Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-05-01 Thread Guido Günther
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:09:59PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>   So as discussed earlier this week, I have tagged the release candidate 1
> of libvirt-1.0.5 in git and pushed the tarball and associated rpms to
> the FTP at:
>ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
> 
> We may still push some of the patches needed by Laine to finish the
> serie started yesterday, but at this point we should focuse our commits
> on bug fixes and documentation. I will make an rc2 at the beginning of
> next week and hopefully can push the final version on May 2nd.
> 
>  This passed my own small usage tests, but please give it a try.
> As usual some feedback on portability issues are really welcome too :-)

Looks good on the Debian buildds:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libvirt&suite=experimental

(still didn't look at the kFreeBSD failures but will do now).
Cheers,
 -- Guido

> 
>   thanks !
> 
> Daniel
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Veillard  | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
> veill...@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
> 
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
> 

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-29 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 04/26/2013 08:19 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> 
> A fix that doesn't assign a PCI address for model=none USB controller is
> pushed now.
> 
I can confirm this is working. Thanks!
> 
> If we really have to do a workaround, I'd suggest just ignoring the PCI
> root and assuming one PCI bus is always there. I fear adding PCI roots
> to machines that don't have them would cause us similar trouble that the
> implicit USB controller does now.
Fully agree. The only reason that I suggested a dummy root as a stop
gap measure was to avoid that we rush in potentially untested code.
The current code base will carry us a while, but eventually
we need to get rid of the implicit devices where they are not
applicable.
Thanks again for fixing the issues.

-- 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards
   Viktor Mihajlovski

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Köderitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294   

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 26/04/2013 10:09, Daniel Veillard ha scritto:
>   So as discussed earlier this week, I have tagged the release candidate 1
> of libvirt-1.0.5 in git and pushed the tarball and associated rpms to
> the FTP at:
>ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
> 
> We may still push some of the patches needed by Laine to finish the
> serie started yesterday, but at this point we should focuse our commits
> on bug fixes and documentation. I will make an rc2 at the beginning of
> next week and hopefully can push the final version on May 2nd.
> 
>  This passed my own small usage tests, but please give it a try.
> As usual some feedback on portability issues are really welcome too :-)

The series at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.libvirt/76786
is ACKed but not pushed.  It can be considered a bugfix:

- it fixes network stat support for 

- it avoids a case where QEMU executes a setuid helper, which it should
never do.

Paolo

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Ján Tomko
On 04/26/2013 04:47 PM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 04:35 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
>>
>> The big switch down there lists the architectures/machines that do have
>> a PCI bus and we disallow adding PCI devices if they don't.
>>
>> I thought that any device that qemuAssignDevicePCISlots assigns a PCI
>> address to would fail at QEMU level with a message about the PCI bus not
>> found, but it seems this is not the case for the implicit USB controller
>> -- we assign the address 0:0:1.2 to it, but it shows up
>> just as '-usb' at the qemu commmand line.
>>
>> Are you able to start it after you delete the PCI address from the USB
>> controller in the XML? (in this case, qemuAssignDevicePCISlots will just
>> assign it without checking if there's a PCI bus available)
>>
> No, the PCI address always get added by default. Specifying model=none
> doesn't help either.

A fix that doesn't assign a PCI address for model=none USB controller is
pushed now.

>>>
>>>Hum, the patch seems to add a big switch about def->os.arch
>>> in qemuDomainDefPostParse()
>>>
>>> +case VIR_ARCH_ALPHA:
>>> +case VIR_ARCH_PPC:
>>> +case VIR_ARCH_PPC64:
>>> +case VIR_ARCH_PPCEMB:
>>> +case VIR_ARCH_SH4:
>>> +case VIR_ARCH_SH4EB:
>>> +addPCIRoot = true;
>>> +break;
>>> +default:
>>> +break;
>>>
>>>I smell a case for s390 is needed somehow.
>>
>> Not here, it would result in it getting an implicit PCI controller in
>> the XML, even though it doesn't have a PCI bus.
>>
>> The right thing would be to catch all the non-PCI devices we assign an
>> adddress to. Or we could just assume 1 PCI bus is always available as a
>> desperate measure not to break anything.
> I am currently testing the workaround adding a fake PCI root. Will get
> you posted. If that works it will give us time to come up with a
> cleaner solution for the next release. I don't want to unconditionally
> disable PCI for s390 even if it is not implemented in today's QEMUs.

Other than the none USB controller fix, which I've already pushed, it
seems the patches I posted before that to fix it have finally made it
through:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg01946.html

If we really have to do a workaround, I'd suggest just ignoring the PCI
root and assuming one PCI bus is always there. I fear adding PCI roots
to machines that don't have them would cause us similar trouble that the
implicit USB controller does now.

Jan

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:56:01PM +0200, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 04:44 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >On 04/26/2013 04:35 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >>
> >>Are you able to start it after you delete the PCI address from the USB
> >>controller in the XML? (in this case, qemuAssignDevicePCISlots will just
> >>assign it without checking if there's a PCI bus available)
> >>
> >
> >Disregard that, it would get added there anyway.
> >
> >I'll do my best to post a patch today
> >
> >Jan.
> >
> Please check out the patch I just sent. It works for me and
> should be good enough until we find a better way to disable
> the implicit USB->PCI device creation.

No, it is not good enough. We must never add hardware to the XML
description that does not exist in the actual VM being launched.
By adding a PCI root to the s390, you create a timebomb which
will change guest ABI if libvirt ever starts honouring that
PCI root config in the future.


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski

On 04/26/2013 04:44 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:

On 04/26/2013 04:35 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:


Are you able to start it after you delete the PCI address from the USB
controller in the XML? (in this case, qemuAssignDevicePCISlots will just
assign it without checking if there's a PCI bus available)



Disregard that, it would get added there anyway.

I'll do my best to post a patch today

Jan.


Please check out the patch I just sent. It works for me and
should be good enough until we find a better way to disable
the implicit USB->PCI device creation.

--

Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards
   Viktor Mihajlovski

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Köderitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski

On 04/26/2013 04:35 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:


The big switch down there lists the architectures/machines that do have
a PCI bus and we disallow adding PCI devices if they don't.

I thought that any device that qemuAssignDevicePCISlots assigns a PCI
address to would fail at QEMU level with a message about the PCI bus not
found, but it seems this is not the case for the implicit USB controller
-- we assign the address 0:0:1.2 to it, but it shows up
just as '-usb' at the qemu commmand line.

Are you able to start it after you delete the PCI address from the USB
controller in the XML? (in this case, qemuAssignDevicePCISlots will just
assign it without checking if there's a PCI bus available)


No, the PCI address always get added by default. Specifying model=none
doesn't help either.


   Hum, the patch seems to add a big switch about def->os.arch
in qemuDomainDefPostParse()

+case VIR_ARCH_ALPHA:
+case VIR_ARCH_PPC:
+case VIR_ARCH_PPC64:
+case VIR_ARCH_PPCEMB:
+case VIR_ARCH_SH4:
+case VIR_ARCH_SH4EB:
+addPCIRoot = true;
+break;
+default:
+break;

   I smell a case for s390 is needed somehow.


Not here, it would result in it getting an implicit PCI controller in
the XML, even though it doesn't have a PCI bus.

The right thing would be to catch all the non-PCI devices we assign an
adddress to. Or we could just assume 1 PCI bus is always available as a
desperate measure not to break anything.

I am currently testing the workaround adding a fake PCI root. Will get
you posted. If that works it will give us time to come up with a
cleaner solution for the next release. I don't want to unconditionally
disable PCI for s390 even if it is not implemented in today's QEMUs.


Jan




--

Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards
   Viktor Mihajlovski

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Köderitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Ján Tomko
On 04/26/2013 04:35 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> 
> Are you able to start it after you delete the PCI address from the USB
> controller in the XML? (in this case, qemuAssignDevicePCISlots will just
> assign it without checking if there's a PCI bus available)
> 

Disregard that, it would get added there anyway.

I'll do my best to post a patch today

Jan.

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Ján Tomko
[removed libvirt-announce from the cc]

On 04/26/2013 04:11 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:02:51PM +0200, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>> On 04/26/2013 10:09 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>>   So as discussed earlier this week, I have tagged the release candidate 1
>>> of libvirt-1.0.5 in git and pushed the tarball and associated rpms to
>>> the FTP at:
>>>ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
>>>
>>> We may still push some of the patches needed by Laine to finish the
>>> serie started yesterday, but at this point we should focuse our commits
>>> on bug fixes and documentation. I will make an rc2 at the beginning of
>>> next week and hopefully can push the final version on May 2nd.
>>>
>>>  This passed my own small usage tests, but please give it a try.
>>> As usual some feedback on portability issues are really welcome too :-)
>> Unfortunately I have to report that commit b33eb0dc seems to have
>> broken s390.
>> I cannot start guests anymore, error message is
>> error: XML error: No PCI buses available
>> Will look into it, but any help is welcome.

The big switch down there lists the architectures/machines that do have
a PCI bus and we disallow adding PCI devices if they don't.

I thought that any device that qemuAssignDevicePCISlots assigns a PCI
address to would fail at QEMU level with a message about the PCI bus not
found, but it seems this is not the case for the implicit USB controller
-- we assign the address 0:0:1.2 to it, but it shows up
just as '-usb' at the qemu commmand line.

Are you able to start it after you delete the PCI address from the USB
controller in the XML? (in this case, qemuAssignDevicePCISlots will just
assign it without checking if there's a PCI bus available)

> 
>   Hum, the patch seems to add a big switch about def->os.arch
> in qemuDomainDefPostParse()
> 
> +case VIR_ARCH_ALPHA:
> +case VIR_ARCH_PPC:
> +case VIR_ARCH_PPC64:
> +case VIR_ARCH_PPCEMB:
> +case VIR_ARCH_SH4:
> +case VIR_ARCH_SH4EB:
> +addPCIRoot = true;
> +break;
> +default:
> +break;
> 
>   I smell a case for s390 is needed somehow.

Not here, it would result in it getting an implicit PCI controller in
the XML, even though it doesn't have a PCI bus.

The right thing would be to catch all the non-PCI devices we assign an
adddress to. Or we could just assume 1 PCI bus is always available as a
desperate measure not to break anything.

Jan

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:02:51PM +0200, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 10:09 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >   So as discussed earlier this week, I have tagged the release candidate 1
> >of libvirt-1.0.5 in git and pushed the tarball and associated rpms to
> >the FTP at:
> >ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/
> >
> >We may still push some of the patches needed by Laine to finish the
> >serie started yesterday, but at this point we should focuse our commits
> >on bug fixes and documentation. I will make an rc2 at the beginning of
> >next week and hopefully can push the final version on May 2nd.
> >
> >  This passed my own small usage tests, but please give it a try.
> >As usual some feedback on portability issues are really welcome too :-)
> Unfortunately I have to report that commit b33eb0dc seems to have
> broken s390.
> I cannot start guests anymore, error message is
> error: XML error: No PCI buses available
> Will look into it, but any help is welcome.

  Hum, the patch seems to add a big switch about def->os.arch
in qemuDomainDefPostParse()

+case VIR_ARCH_ALPHA:
+case VIR_ARCH_PPC:
+case VIR_ARCH_PPC64:
+case VIR_ARCH_PPCEMB:
+case VIR_ARCH_SH4:
+case VIR_ARCH_SH4EB:
+addPCIRoot = true;
+break;
+default:
+break;

  I smell a case for s390 is needed somehow.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard  | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
veill...@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski

On 04/26/2013 10:09 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:

   So as discussed earlier this week, I have tagged the release candidate 1
of libvirt-1.0.5 in git and pushed the tarball and associated rpms to
the FTP at:
ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/

We may still push some of the patches needed by Laine to finish the
serie started yesterday, but at this point we should focuse our commits
on bug fixes and documentation. I will make an rc2 at the beginning of
next week and hopefully can push the final version on May 2nd.

  This passed my own small usage tests, but please give it a try.
As usual some feedback on portability issues are really welcome too :-)

Unfortunately I have to report that commit b33eb0dc seems to have
broken s390.
I cannot start guests anymore, error message is
error: XML error: No PCI buses available
Will look into it, but any help is welcome.


   thanks !

Daniel




--

Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards
   Viktor Mihajlovski

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Köderitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Ruben Kerkhof wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> 
> > This passed my own small usage tests, but please give it a try.
> > As usual some feedback on portability issues are really welcome too :-)
> >
> 
> It compiles on OSX 10.8

  Good :-)

> make check:
> 
> 1 of 202 tests failed
> (10 tests were not run)
> Please report to libvir-list@redhat.com
> ===
> make[4]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
> make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
> 
> This is a gnulib test:
> [ruben@odin ~/src/libvirt-1.0.5/gnulib/tests]$ ./test-getgroups
> test-getgroups.c:58: assertion failed
> Abort trap: 6

  Okay, maybe Eric can guess what's going on

thanks !

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard  | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
veill...@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] Entering freeze for libvirt-1.0.5

2013-04-26 Thread Ruben Kerkhof
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:

> This passed my own small usage tests, but please give it a try.
> As usual some feedback on portability issues are really welcome too :-)
>

It compiles on OSX 10.8

make check:

1 of 202 tests failed
(10 tests were not run)
Please report to libvir-list@redhat.com
===
make[4]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1

This is a gnulib test:
[ruben@odin ~/src/libvirt-1.0.5/gnulib/tests]$ ./test-getgroups
test-getgroups.c:58: assertion failed
Abort trap: 6

Kind regards,

Ruben
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list