Exclusion of international laws

2002-01-07 Thread Abe Kornelis

Hello all,

Best wishes for the new year to all of you.

I have noticed that various OSI-approved licenses
exclude the United Nations Convention on Contracts
for the International Sale of Goods.

First question: why would anyone want to exclude
a supranational regulation. I'd suppose such 
regulations are installed in order to promote
international trade...

Second question: Once this Convention has been
ratified by a country's government I'd assume it
has status of law within that country. Is it
legally possible then, to bypass such a regulation?
I mean, I could write that applciation of regulations
relating to racism are excluded from my license X,
but I seriously doubt that such a statement would
have any consequence: it would simply be overridden
by 'the law'. Anybody willing to shed some light
on these - to me - murky matters?

Thanks in advance, and kind regards, Abe.
-- 
Abe F. Kornelis, B.V. Bixoft
Het Jaagpad 63, 3461 HA Linschoten
The Netherlands
phone: +31-6-22755401

To visit our website:
either: http://www.bixoft.com
or: http://www.bixoft.nl

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



Re: Exclusion of international laws

2002-01-07 Thread Chloe Hoffman

This is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established. 
etc etc

From: Abe Kornelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exclusion of international laws
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 22:02:29 -0800

Hello all,

Best wishes for the new year to all of you.

I have noticed that various OSI-approved licenses
exclude the United Nations Convention on Contracts
for the International Sale of Goods.

First question: why would anyone want to exclude
a supranational regulation. I'd suppose such
regulations are installed in order to promote
international trade...


A contracting party would want to exclude the UN CISG primarily where it 
prefers a different law. For example, where a party prefers the law of New 
York with respect to all its transactions, domestic or international, it 
would want to exclude the UN CISG from applying to its international 
contracts - a uniformity reason. A party may want to have a law it knows 
apply instead of assume the interpretation of the UN CISG - a certainty 
reason. A party may disagree with the provisions of the UN CISG - a 
substantive reason. Of course, there could me many more reasons. You can 
read the UN CISG here:
http://www.uncitral.org/english/texts/sales/CISG.htm

Second question: Once this Convention has been
ratified by a country's government I'd assume it
has status of law within that country. Is it
legally possible then, to bypass such a regulation?
I mean, I could write that applciation of regulations
relating to racism are excluded from my license X,
but I seriously doubt that such a statement would
have any consequence: it would simply be overridden
by 'the law'. Anybody willing to shed some light
on these - to me - murky matters?


The UN CISG expressly permits parties, i.e. parties to a contract as 
distinct from the States who ratify the CISG, to exclude its application.

Article 6

The parties may exclude the application of this Convention or, subject to 
article 12, derogate from or vary the effect of any of its provisions.

http://www.uncitral.org/english/texts/sales/CISG.htm


Thanks in advance, and kind regards, Abe.
--
Abe F. Kornelis, B.V. Bixoft
Het Jaagpad 63, 3461 HA Linschoten
The Netherlands
phone: +31-6-22755401

To visit our website:
either: http://www.bixoft.com
 or: http://www.bixoft.nl

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3