Me, too -- was: PLS, UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!!
When you figure it out, let me know how to get off. Thanks, -Mitch - Forwarded message from Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Matej Cepl" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 21:33:34 +0200 Subject: PLS, UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!! Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Confirm-Reading-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pmrqc: 1 Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) Is there anybody able to unsubscribe me, trying both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I has been unsuccessfull. Sorry, for bothering you, but I am on very expensive phone line and daily-load of this list is too much for me. Please help! Matthew - End forwarded message - -- Any command with less than 48 switches is a Cat in the Hat book. - E. Charters
Re: unsubscribe me
unsubscribe me Me too, please. I've been trying for over a month to get unsubscribed from this list. The "authoritative" address doesn't work ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Any help escaping this list would be appreciated. Thanks, -Mitch
Re: Simple Public License, third draft
Does anybody know how to get off this list? I have tried unsuccessfully for two weeks to remove myself, using the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. I will be going on vacation at the end of the week and an autoresponder will answer all my emails. I want to avoid auto-spamming this list if at all possible. If anybody knows the private email of the person responsible for list subscriptions, I would be appreciative of the info. Or, if I am incorrect in the above email for list removal, a correction would be welcomed. Thanks, -Mitch Justin Wells wrote: Hi Bruce, Are you happier with this draft? I removed the langage relating to purpose. I've sent a copy of it to a lawyer or review now, and hope to be able to start using it, and promoting its use, soon.
Re: list archive/hardware design license discussion?
Does anybody know how to get off this list? I have tried unsuccessfully for two weeks to remove myself, using the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. I will be going on vacation at the end of the week and an autoresponder will answer all my emails. I want to avoid auto-spamming this list if at all possible. If anybody knows the private email of the person responsible for list subscriptions, I would be appreciative of the info. Or, if I am incorrect in the above email for list removal, a correction would be welcomed. Thanks, -Mitch Kristofer wrote: I'm new to this list - forgive me if there's a well-known answer to this question. I believe there have been discussions before on the list about appropriate free licenses for hardware designs. However, I can't find an archive for the list. Is there an archive; and if not, has anyone kept records of any related threads? /lurk there's an archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/license-discuss%40opensource.org/ if that's of any use. i pseudo-lurked there before subscribing. now i jurk for real. lurk -- Any command with less than 48 switches is a Cat in the Hat book. - E. Charters
Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Philipp Gühring [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13. IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR THE TIME OR MONEY YOU LOST WHEN PLAYING, WATCHING OR LISTENING TO THE GAME. Philipp, Have you already consulted an attorney who told you that this new license provision was necessary? I very strongly doubt that it's necessary on top of the generic "no warranty" claims already present in the GPL. Otherwise, there would be similar claims already attached to books, movies, and commercial video games. Am I the only one here who took this as a joke? -Mitch
Re: Essay RFC delayed.
Ean R . Schuessler wrote: Come on Eric, laugh at yourself a little. I'm just yanking your chain because you make yourself such an easy target. I agree. That last tirade against Richard was just a little bit much. I think Eric deserves praise for all his work, and also believe that it helpful to all of us (in sum). But for someone who is tolerant enough of others viewpoints to become a "media-whore", I find it quite confusing that he would criticize Richard for simply not wanting to be associated with a group whose ideals are not his own (yet portrayed in the media as being the same, which can cause confusion). [snip] pps. I'll give you $20 if you'll stop saying "tribe". I would like to add another $20 to the anti-tribe fund. :) On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:37:14AM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Right. I take it you would have preferred to live in a ghetto for another twenty years, watching the likes of Microsoft gradually smother the net until there was no space left for people like RMS at all? [ assorted self-rightous swaggerings ] And I'll stay glad I did no matter how many jerks sneer at me for it. The price is high, but the prize is worth it. *Despite* you. -Mitch -- The reason why worry kills more people than work is that more people worry than work.
