For what it is worth, I am a lawyer that does work in the open source world and
I have found the recent discussions, including the Rosen/Kuhn dialog, to be
among the interesting and valuable discussions that I've seen on this list in a
while.
And yes, I have been doing open source work long enough to appreciate the fact
that it's not the first time that these issues have come up--the discussion
still has value.
________________________________
From: Lawrence Rosen <lro...@rosenlaw.com>
To: license-discuss@opensource.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Open source license chooser choosealicense.com
launched.
Hi Luis,
I refuse your request to be silent. What is more important to this list than
this discussion? I won't just sit here like a lump while Bradley and others
continue to encourage OSI to accept erroneous theories about license
proliferation and while various groups implement FOSS "license choosers"
that ignore legal analysis.
If you believe that this or any other list is overflowing, open your drain
wider.
/Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: Luis Villa [mailto:l...@lu.is]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:26 AM
To: License Discuss; Lawrence Rosen; Bradley M. Kuhn
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Open source license chooser
choosealicense.com launched.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bk...@ebb.org> wrote:
>
> I don't think we need to (or should have) this debate (again) here
Yes, please, let's not rehash this discussion here. It's been done many
times, and the list is already overflowing this week.
Luis
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
