Re: [License-discuss] Free Public License/0 Clause BSD License with Zlib Warranty Disclaimer
Hello Nate, I was actually having the same question as you and I don't know if you have found an answer yet. I just have found this page : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT, where MIT licence variants are described. Some of them have a minimal no-waranty clause and are close to the license text you want to have, especially the very last one. The first sentence of the page states that : " There are many MIT variants, all of which are functionally identical.". Based on that, I conclude that there is no issue with your license text because it is functionally identical to the Free Public License (and to any of the MIT variants as well). That being said, I am not an expert. Hope it did help and happy Easter , Jonas ___ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
Re: [License-discuss] Free Public License/0 Clause BSD License with Zlib Warranty Disclaimer
Hello Nate, I was actually having the same question as you and I don't know if you have found an answer yet. I just have found this page : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT, where MIT licence variants are described. Some of them have a minimal no-waranty clause and are close to the license text you want to have, especially the very last one. The first sentence of the page states that : " There are many MIT variants, all of which are functionally identical.". Based on that, I conclude that there is no issue with your license text because it is functionally identical to the Free Public License (and to any of the MIT variants as well). That being said, I am not an expert. Hope it did help and happy Easter :-), Jonas ___ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss