[Licq-main] problems with sending over server (CVS)

2002-03-13 Thread avalong

Hi 2 All!

I complied the latest CVS-version on my SuSE-Linux computer (not behind a
firewall) and I noticed (as with older licq 1.1.0 CVS-Snapshots too),
that after an unpredictable time no messages - sent over server - won't
arrive any recipient anymore. That appears to everybody, no matter what
icq he has. If I disconnect and than connect to the icq-server again, all
messages will arrive fine for a while... but only for a while. That could
be 10 minutes or an hour. Then I have to disconnect and connect again. If
everybody had icq 2002 or licq 1.1.0 on his client, it would be no
problem, because these clients are able to handle direct connections
between firewalls. But to someone who has icq2001 behind a firewall for
example I MUST send indirect over the server (I know the reason is the new
protocol). And it is very nerving to ask peoples always, if he gets my
messages you know?.

Is there anybody with the same problem? - Is it a bug from licq? - Or must
I install ipv6 on my linux computer (i noticed, that licq generates ipv6
packets)? Generally I think it's not a problem with licq.. rather with AOL
;) The question is, what can I do against it?

THX a lot for helping!!!

Bye, Andi

___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main



Re: [Licq-main] More suggested features

2002-03-13 Thread DeXteR



Mathias Bondeson wrote:
 ICQ SMS capability:
 
 It should be possible to send and receive SMS messages from LICQ. This
 has been implemented in several other clients, so it shouldn't be so
 hard to implement in LICQ either.

If ya can go ahead, devels are working on all non-implemented features



 Selective invisible listing:
 
 It should be possible to see invisible users in the list, also when you
 are not on their visible lists.

As far as this can be done, it's allready done.

 
 It would also be nice if there were a different symbol for users which
 are invisible and do not have visible-listed and those who have
 visible-listed the LICQ user.

Is there a diffence by being in invisible or invisible? :))


 One Display-field different from the Alias-field in the Userinfo:
 
 It would be nice to be able to refresh the userinfo without changing the
 labeling of the contact in the contact list. And as it would be nice
 to have an Alias field and to be able to update that, the best
 solution would be to have a separate Display field, as in ICQ.

Idea, i'll send this to devel list  in a sec, i guess their reply:
First complete the 2001b protocol implementation.
submit this to the sourceforge feature request page...



 Expanded userinfo:
 
 It would be nice to be able to view all userinfo, including personal
 interests and so on, from LICQ.
 
 Phone info:
 
 It would be nice to be able to receive phone info from those ICQ users
 which have me on their ICQ lists.
 
 ICQ Phone:
 
 It would be nice to have the ICQ Phone functionality in LICQ. Don't know
 how easy this is to implement, though.
 
 

Working on it, lot of work to be done :)


Greets, Arjen H


___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main



Re: [Licq-main] problems with sending over server (CVS)

2002-03-13 Thread Jon Keating

On Thursday 14 March 2002 08:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I complied the latest CVS-version on my SuSE-Linux computer (not behind a
 firewall) and I noticed (as with older licq 1.1.0 CVS-Snapshots too),
 that after an unpredictable time no messages - sent over server - won't
 arrive any recipient anymore. That appears to everybody, no matter what
 icq he has. If I disconnect and than connect to the icq-server again, all
 messages will arrive fine for a while... but only for a while. That could
 be 10 minutes or an hour. Then I have to disconnect and connect again. If
 everybody had icq 2002 or licq 1.1.0 on his client, it would be no
 problem, because these clients are able to handle direct connections
 between firewalls. But to someone who has icq2001 behind a firewall for
 example I MUST send indirect over the server (I know the reason is the new
 protocol). And it is very nerving to ask peoples always, if he gets my
 messages you know?.


I have not had any problems with sending messages through the server at all.  
Perhaps you can show a packet where it works, and then the next packet where 
it doesn't work?

 Is there anybody with the same problem? - Is it a bug from licq? - Or must
 I install ipv6 on my linux computer (i noticed, that licq generates ipv6
 packets)? Generally I think it's not a problem with licq.. rather with AOL
 ;) The question is, what can I do against it?


licq doesn't generate ipv6 packets at all.  It only generates a packet with 
the aim protocol and lets the kernel put the headers on it.

Jon

___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main



RE: [Licq-main] problems with sending over server (CVS)

2002-03-13 Thread Michael Wojcikiewicz

I've been getting the same behaviour from licq for the last little while
(also using CVS compiled version from a few weeks ago).  It seems that
none of my messages will ever go through after a little while... I am
behind a firewall (at work), but no policies have changed in a long time,
and it used to work.  sounds like mirabilis messing with the protocol
again.

--mike



___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main



Re: [Licq-main] More suggested features

2002-03-13 Thread Gunnar

Here is another feature that could be nice:
a switch to make LICQ play when a message arrives... but not play again until 
there is no ICQ activity and then wait 2-3 minutes more.
What do you think?

Gunnar

___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main



[Licq-main] licq segm fault (cvs, today)

2002-03-13 Thread Simon Oosthoek

Hi all

I've seen this come by before, just thought I'd add my own experiences to
help fix this problem

I get licq from cvs using update -D today, whenever I try. Since about 4th
of March, I'm getting segmentation faults when starting the resulting
binaries. This is what I see:

licq: no process killed
20:08:20: [WRN] Licq: Ignoring stale lockfile (pid 6205)
20:08:20: [INI] Owner configuration.
20:08:20: [INI] User configuration.
20:08:20: [INI] Loading 86 users.
20:08:20: [INI] Loading saved auto-responses.
20:08:20: [INI] Loading utilities.
20:08:20: [TCP] Local TCP server started on port 32834.
20:08:20: [INI] Opening fifo.
20:08:20: [INI] Spawning daemon threads.
20:08:20: [INI] Starting plugin Qt GUI (version 1.1.0).
20:08:20: [INI] Attempting to load en Qt-GUI translation.
20:08:20: [INI] Qt GUI configuration.
QFont::setRawMode(): Invalid XLFD: 6x13
QFont::setRawMode(): Invalid XLFD: 6x13
20:08:20: [INI] Geometry configuration (1019, 19) (128 x 711)
20:08:21: [INI] Applying pli skin.
Licq Segmentation Violation Detected.
Backtrace:
/local/src/licq-cvs/licq/src/licq(licq_handle_sigsegv+0x84) [0x8097d24]
/lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x401273ab]
/lib/libc.so.6 [0x401e47c8]
/usr/local/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so(__13CUserViewItemP7ICQUserP13CUserViewItem+0xb9)
[0x40377839]
/usr/local/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so(updateUserWin__11CMainWindow+0x384)
[0x4034d7c4]
/usr/local/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so(setCurrentGroup__11CMainWindowi+0x1b5)
[0x4034e335]
/usr/local/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so(updateGroups__11CMainWindow+0x868)
[0x4034eba8]
/usr/local/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so(__11CMainWindowP10CICQDaemonP14CSignalManagerP12CQtLogWindowbPCcT5P7QWidget+0x190f)
[0x4034ab8f]
/usr/local/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so(Run__8CLicqGuiP10CICQDaemon+0xc9)
[0x40348229]
/usr/local/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so(LP_Main+0x49) [0x40346069]
/usr/local/lib/licq/licq_qt-gui.so(LP_Main_tep+0x1d) [0x40345d6d]
/lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x401249c7]
/lib/libc.so.6(__clone+0x3a) [0x402a576a]
Attempting to generate core file.

this is on a mandrake 8.1 system which is kept reasonably up to date and it
has the KDE 2.2.2 packages on them from the kde site.

I can provide more detailed information if someone wants it...

I'll go back to a version that can actually start up ;-)

Simon

___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main



Re: [Licq-main] problems with sending over server (CVS)

2002-03-13 Thread Jamin W . Collins

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:21:45 -0500
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Michael Wojcikiewicz wrote:
 I've been getting the same behaviour from licq for the last little while
 (also using CVS compiled version from a few weeks ago).  It seems that
 none of my messages will ever go through after a little while... I am
 behind a firewall (at work), but no policies have changed in a long
 time, and it used to work.  sounds like mirabilis messing with the
 protocol again.
 
 --mike
 
 
 Hello, I remember writing about having this problem   maybe 3 weeks
 ago. but  I think I was dismissed like an old crazy lady..LOL..
 But anyway I too can send mesg. for a little while then after disconnect
 and riconnect, it will start , again, it is a viciuos circle.. it
 used to work fine and all of the sudden ...??? who knowes what
 happened.. I use SuSE  Linux 7.3 and licq version 1.1.0/SSl QT GUI
 plugin version 1.04...

This problem has been reported on the GnomeICU list several times.  I
believe they found the problem to be that they were ignoring a message
from the ICQ server concerning messages being sent too fast.  Perhaps this
is the case here too?

___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main



Re: [Licq-main] More suggested features

2002-03-13 Thread Yosi

From: DeXteR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mathias Bondeson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Licq-main] More suggested features
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 17:07:12 +0100

Mathias Bondeson wrote:
snip
Selective invisible listing:

It should be possible to see invisible users in the list, also when you 
are not on their visible lists.

As far as this can be done, it's allready done.

I posted a question about this very same feature about a month ago, and was
told that it cannot be implemented because it is a behaviour determined by 
the
ICQ server, and not the client.
Can someone please clarify if this feature can be implemented by the client 
and
is it implemented in Licq ?

Sincerely,
Yosi


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


___
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main