[Lift] Re: mapper vs record
Record is not finished yet and yes it is the new mapper. So please use Mapper. AFAIK Record is targeted for Lift 1.1. Br's, Marius On Jan 25, 6:35 pm, Alex Boisvert boisv...@intalio.com wrote: Hi guys, I've been a little out of the loop recently... so excuse me if I'm asking a dump question. I see there's now lift-mapper and lift-record modules. If I understand correctly, record is the newly redesigned mapper? It looks like the examples still use mapper and documentation/tutorials seems to be thin for record. Now, say I'm starting a new lift project, which one would you recommend? alex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: mapper vs record
Okidooke. Thanks for the clarification. On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Record is not finished yet and yes it is the new mapper. So please use Mapper. AFAIK Record is targeted for Lift 1.1. Br's, Marius On Jan 25, 6:35 pm, Alex Boisvert boisv...@intalio.com wrote: Hi guys, I've been a little out of the loop recently... so excuse me if I'm asking a dump question. I see there's now lift-mapper and lift-record modules. If I understand correctly, record is the newly redesigned mapper? It looks like the examples still use mapper and documentation/tutorials seems to be thin for record. Now, say I'm starting a new lift project, which one would you recommend? alex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Passing list URL parameters to snippets
Hey guys,
I have a situation where I want to do something like:
LiftRules.rewrite.prepend(NamedPF(catalougeBind) {
case RewriteRequest(path @ ParsePath(catalouge :: groups, _,
_,_), _, _) =
RewriteResponse(catalouge :: Nil, Map(groups -
groups))
}
However, this is obviously invalid, so how else could I pass the list
of groups which could be any number of parameters to my snippet?
RequestVar perhaps? I've looked at the wiki example with its
zipWithIndex solution mapping x parameters onto param1, param2 etc but
this is not really workable for what I need.
Id appreciate any thoughts you guys might have
Cheers
Tim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: Passing list URL parameters to snippets
Not sure what the answer is to this (not even sure what's being asked),
but you probably mean catalogue, not catalouge. Of course, the American
spelling is catalog.
:-)
Chas.
Tim Perrett wrote:
Hey guys,
I have a situation where I want to do something like:
LiftRules.rewrite.prepend(NamedPF(catalougeBind) {
case RewriteRequest(path @ ParsePath(catalouge :: groups, _,
_,_), _, _) =
RewriteResponse(catalouge :: Nil, Map(groups -
groups))
}
However, this is obviously invalid, so how else could I pass the list
of groups which could be any number of parameters to my snippet?
RequestVar perhaps? I've looked at the wiki example with its
zipWithIndex solution mapping x parameters onto param1, param2 etc but
this is not really workable for what I need.
Id appreciate any thoughts you guys might have
Cheers
Tim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: Passing list URL parameters to snippets
Try:
RewriteResponse(catalouge :: Nil, Map(groups.zipWithIndex.map{case (g, i)
= (group+i, g)} :_*))
Thanks,
David
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Tim Perrett he...@timperrett.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I have a situation where I want to do something like:
LiftRules.rewrite.prepend(NamedPF(catalougeBind) {
case RewriteRequest(path @ ParsePath(catalouge :: groups, _,
_,_), _, _) =
RewriteResponse(catalouge :: Nil, Map(groups -
groups))
}
However, this is obviously invalid, so how else could I pass the list
of groups which could be any number of parameters to my snippet?
RequestVar perhaps? I've looked at the wiki example with its
zipWithIndex solution mapping x parameters onto param1, param2 etc but
this is not really workable for what I need.
Id appreciate any thoughts you guys might have
Cheers
Tim
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: ** breaking change **
Would the same key appear if there where resource bundles for different variations of the same language. eg. 'en-AU', 'en-US', 'en- ZA', and 'en' ? Marc On 26/01/2009, at 4:46 AM, Marius wrote: If you have the same key in different files the first one found will be returned. Nevertheless having the same key in different files doesn't make much sense. If you're running into any issues please let me know. Thoughts, questions? Br's, Marius --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: ** breaking change **
On Jan 26, 2:27 am, Marc Boschma marc+lift...@boschma.cx wrote: Would the same key appear if there where resource bundles for different variations of the same language. eg. 'en-AU', 'en-US', 'en- ZA', and 'en' ? Of course the same key appears in lang file variants. Nevertheless these resource bundles apply as they did before based on LiftRules.calculateLocale (if I remember the name right). The locale is giving lang-country pair. Marc On 26/01/2009, at 4:46 AM, Marius wrote: If you have the same key in different files the first one found will be returned. Nevertheless having the same key in different files doesn't make much sense. If you're running into any issues please let me know. Thoughts, questions? Br's, Marius --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
