[Lift] Re: Hiring Lift Developers
You forgot to mention where you are in the world, it might be useful to know... :P On 15 June, 18:32, David LaPalomento dlapalome...@novell.com wrote: Hi all, My team has recently started a project based around Lift and we're looking at bringing on some passionate, full-time developers to make that happen. It's a pretty ambitious effort and we expect to be pushing the technology envelope in real-time communication (CometActors have already been a huge help here) and user experience for web applications. If you think you might be interested, drop me an email and I'd be glad to go into greater detail about the project. Also, apologies in advance if I shouldn't be posting this sort of thing to the list. Regards, David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: Hiring Lift Developers
I suspect that London UK would probably be an exception too far! On 15 June, 23:45, David LaPalomento dlapalome...@novell.com wrote: Good point, sorry! Most of the team is located in the Boston area, but we'd probably be willing to make exceptions. On Jun 15, 4:14 pm, KWright kev.lee.wri...@googlemail.com wrote: You forgot to mention where you are in the world, it might be useful to know... :P On 15 June, 18:32, David LaPalomento dlapalome...@novell.com wrote: Hi all, My team has recently started a project based around Lift and we're looking at bringing on some passionate, full-time developers to make that happen. It's a pretty ambitious effort and we expect to be pushing the technology envelope in real-time communication (CometActors have already been a huge help here) and user experience for web applications. If you think you might be interested, drop me an email and I'd be glad to go into greater detail about the project. Also, apologies in advance if I shouldn't be posting this sort of thing to the list. Regards, David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] SeaJug movie/slides
http://wiki.liftweb.net/index.php/SeaJUG doesn't appear to actually have any link to the movie I'm also getting a 404 from the link http://trazio.com/SeaJUG_slides.pdf Does anyone have access to a copy of these resources so that we can repost some valid links? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: Great pictures from the Scala Lift Off
Something in london! please anyone... On Jun 8, 10:25 pm, TylerWeir tyler.w...@gmail.com wrote: Washington, DC area in October 2009. Road trip! I plan on attending LiftOffEast. On Jun 8, 4:06 pm, Dean Wampler deanwamp...@gmail.com wrote: Is the date set for the Washington, DC meeting? On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote: I'm still pushing for a Scala on Skis conference out here in Colorado ;) It's looking like Scala on Skis will be held in Lausanne, Switzerland in Spring 2010. We'll also have a Scala Lift Off in the Washington, DC area in October 2009. Maybe we'll have a Denver-based conference in 2010. Derek On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: Sweet! So jeleous of you guys cant wait to have a EMEA scala geek meet! Then myself, Viktor and Heiko can really hit the beers ;-) Cheers, Tim On Jun 8, 5:53 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, Ilya not only writes great IDE plugins, he takes good pictures: http://picasaweb.google.com/ilyas239/Scalaliftoff09# Thanks, David -- Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp Git some:http://github.com/dpp -- Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp Git some:http://github.com/dpp -- Dean Wampler coauthor of Programming Scala (O'Reilly) twitter: @deanwampler, @chicagoscala Chicago-Area Scala Enthusiasts (CASE): - http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoscala - http://www.meetup.com/chicagoscala/(Meetings)http://www.objectmentor --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: How to remove leading text in Msgs.error
I'm currently working on an alternative that allows errors to be displayed as part of a nodeset using a surround/bind idiom. Should be ready just as soon as I get the ajax side of things straightened out... My goal is different in that I wanted to be able to display errors using a jquery-ui themed div with an alert icon for displaying errors, but perhaps this approach could help you out as well? On Jun 5, 2:26 pm, Bryan. germ...@gmail.com wrote: +1 on removing the default text. --Bryan On Jun 5, 6:46 am, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: The reason for that is that if the node text is empty (and yes we explicitly trim it) we render the default text. To be honest I'm not a fan of this approach either. I think it should be ok to just not render a default text. Does anyone have any objections? If not I could change this real quick, if yes let's talk about it. Br's, Marius On Jun 5, 12:48 pm, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote: Hi, I'm trying to remove the Notice, Error lead in text that is displayed when using the Msgs snippet, like this: lift:snippet type=msgs lift:notice_msg class=success/lift:notice_msg lift:error_msg class=error/lift:error_msg lift:warning_msg class=notice/lift:warning_msg /lift:snippet Looking at the code, it seems the default text is used if the specified text is empty, so I tried putting a nbsp; in there but this also seems to be swallowed. Is there anyway to do this (besides changing the default property values)?? /Jeppe --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: Tail merge?
Me or marius? Personally, I'm full of ideas :) On May 9, 1:26 am, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: Sounds like this could be a neat addition. Looking forward to see what you come up with :-) Cheers, Tim On 08/05/2009 20:19, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: A lift:tail built in snippet might me a good addition. I could probably allocate some time to noodle on it. Br's, Marius On May 8, 5:05 pm, KWright kev.lee.wri...@googlemail.com wrote: It's becoming an established best practice that scripts should be put at the END of a page, where possible, in order to speed up download times Good article here:http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html It would be nice if Lift could help encourage and support this by allowing a tail (or Lift:tail?) element that could be merged in the same fashion as the head element, perhaps also removing duplicates, etc. This element would then disappear and expose only its content when the page is ultimately sent to the browser. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Lift] Re: Tail merge?
Been thinking about this more, just trying to explore where this idea leads: - Where tail merge would really shine is that a snippet could be embedded inside a div tag, for example, but still have a tail pushed to the end of the page body. - Script entries in the head and tail blocks could be quickly analysed and duplicate scripts removed. - Possibly some additional elements/attributes on scripts inside head and tail blocks could ultimately evolve into part of a richer dependency management framework. On May 10, 9:39 pm, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: On May 10, 10:08 pm, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote: What I've been noodling about for some time is to have dependency management as a part of the framework. That could be easily obtained by having widgets etc register their dependencies in a SessionVar[List[Dependency]] and then simply add a DispatchPF to serve those dependencies as one package with the separate GET. So what would this solve? ... I mean there is the ResourceServer used currently by widgets so that widget's dependencies to be served ... perhaps I'm missing something? The downsides I've come up with are: * Adds a reasonable amount of complexity * The order of the dependencies is hard to get right * Premature optimization * Moves away from idea to have JS libraries served by third party hosts * Kind of defeats the purpose of caching JS Just my 2 cents, Viktor On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Yeah google analytics is a good use case. I think talking about smashing static files is off topic, but there is some value in having a tail merge for when you want to put stuff in just before the body tag. My only thinking right now is that why do we need a specific snippet to do this? Right now, lift-tag:bind and lift-tag:with- param would work perfectly for this right? Cheers, Tim On May 10, 3:21 pm, Bryan. germ...@gmail.com wrote: A nice use for this tail merge would be for the Google Analytics tracking code, especially the ecommerce tracking code. Here's something to keep an eye on as well: http://blog.digg.com/?p=621 -- still very new and in development. --Bryan On May 10, 9:57 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:55 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: People can choose to smash multiple js/css files into a single one, in fact it is a common practice. However for scripts that can be deferred putting them at the bottom of the page can improve rendering. Okay.. so we're not actually putting the scripts on the page, we're just putting them right about the /body tag? Br's, Marius On May 10, 4:42 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: Sounds like this could be a neat addition. Looking forward to see what you come up with :-) I'm not 100% keen on it. Loading a ton of stuff into the HTML page (rather than having stuff cached by the browser) makes for larger page sizes. I'd much rather see a tool that would analyze the scripts and css that was included across lots of pages and recommending to the developer to make 10 CSS files or 20 script files into 1. But that's just me. Cheers, Tim On 08/05/2009 20:19, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: A lift:tail built in snippet might me a good addition. I could probably allocate some time to noodle on it. Br's, Marius On May 8, 5:05 pm, KWright kev.lee.wri...@googlemail.com wrote: It's becoming an established best practice that scripts should be put at the END of a page, where possible, in order to speed up download times Good article here: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html It would be nice if Lift could help encourage and support this by allowing a tail (or Lift:tail?) element that could be merged in the same fashion as the head element, perhaps also removing duplicates, etc. This element would then disappear and expose only its content when the page is ultimately sent to the browser. -- Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp Git some:http://github.com/dpp -- Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp Git some:http://github.com/dpp
[Lift] Tail merge?
It's becoming an established best practice that scripts should be put at the END of a page, where possible, in order to speed up download times Good article here: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html It would be nice if Lift could help encourage and support this by allowing a tail (or Lift:tail?) element that could be merged in the same fashion as the head element, perhaps also removing duplicates, etc. This element would then disappear and expose only its content when the page is ultimately sent to the browser. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Lift group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
