[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **status**: Fixed --> Verified --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Verified **Labels:** Fixed_2_19_63 **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:00 PM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **labels**: --> Fixed_2_19_63 - **status**: Started --> Fixed - **Patch**: push --> - **Comment**: author Jay Anderson Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:58:17 +0100 (12:58 +0100) committer James Lowe Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:58:17 +0100 (12:58 +0100) commit 212ca268e813cd72eca8c07e714e1b6669cba747 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Fixed **Labels:** Fixed_2_19_63 **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:15 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Patch**: countdown --> push - **Comment**: Patch counted down - I will push this for you. --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:14 PM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
patch on countdown for June 20th --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Wed Jun 14, 2017 10:04 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Patch**: review --> countdown --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:13 PM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Needs**: --> - **Patch**: new --> review - **Type**: --> Enhancement - **Comment**: Passes make, make check and a full make doc. --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Wed Jun 14, 2017 05:03 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Minor edit to docs http://codereview.appspot.com/321930043 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Wed Jun 14, 2017 05:03 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Needs**: --> - **Patch**: new --> review - **Type**: --> Enhancement - **Comment**: Passes make, make check and a full make doc. --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Mon Jun 12, 2017 05:18 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Rebase, simplify scheme with every as suggested http://codereview.appspot.com/321930043 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Mon Jun 12, 2017 05:18 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Patch**: review --> needs_work - **Comment**: This looks like it still needs some work. --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sun May 28, 2017 08:50 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Needs**: --> - **Patch**: new --> review - **Type**: --> Enhancement - **Comment**: Passes make, make check and a full make doc. --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sat May 27, 2017 07:51 PM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Don't merge pitched rests http://codereview.appspot.com/321930043 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sat May 27, 2017 07:51 PM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Patch**: review --> needs_work - **Comment**: From the Rietveld comments this looks like it needs some work - if not (and the discussion is about something that could be looked at after this patch) then feel free to move this on to 'countdown'. --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Tue May 23, 2017 11:01 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
This looks like it still needs some work, I will leave this on review for now though. --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sun May 21, 2017 10:37 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Attached a first sketch to reparent to surviving mmrs. Causes a programming error, if changing noBreak to break in the example. Maybe of some help, though. Attachments: - [atest-58.ly](https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/_discuss/thread/43de6c28/d443/attachment/atest-58.ly) (4.8 kB; text/x-lilypond) --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sun May 21, 2017 09:35 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Needs**: --> - **Patch**: new --> review - **Type**: --> Enhancement - **Comment**: Passes make, make check and a full make doc --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sun May 21, 2017 12:25 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Make overlapped grobs invisible, update regression test for attached text, fix error http://codereview.appspot.com/321930043 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sun May 21, 2017 12:25 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **Needs**: --> - **Patch**: new --> needs_work - **Type**: --> Enhancement - **Comment**: Fails make check. .../regression/merge-rests-engraver.ly ~~~ Processing `./e0/lily-cbbf11e5.ly' Parsing... Renaming input to: `/home/james/lilypond-git/input/regression/merge-rests-engraver.ly' Interpreting music...Backtrace: In /home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/lily.scm: 1025: 1* (let* ((failed #)) (if (ly:get-option #) (begin #)) ...) 1025: 2* [lilypond-all #] 1038: 3 (let* ((failed #) (separate-logs #) (ping-log #) ...) (gc) ...) 1050: 4* [for-each # #] In unknown file: ?: 5* [# "e0/lily-cbbf11e5.ly"] In /home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/lily.scm: 1052: 6* (let* (# # #) (if separate-logs #) (if ping-log #) ...) 1063: 7* [lilypond-file # "e0/lily-cbbf11e5.ly"] 1098: 8 [catch ly-file-failed # #] In unknown file: ?: 9* [#] In /home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/lily.scm: 1099: 10* [ly:parse-file "e0/lily-cbbf11e5.ly"] In /home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/ly/init.ly: 56: 11* (let* ((book-handler #)) (cond (# #) (# #))) 59: 12 (cond (# #) (# #)) In /home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/lily-library.scm: ... 243: 13 [ly:book-process-to-systems # #< Output_def> ...] In unknown file: ?: 14* [# #] ?: 15* [# # #] ?: 16* [# #] ?: 17* [# # #] ?: 18* [Merge_rests_engraver #] ?: 19* (letrec (# # # # ...) (let # #)) In /home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/scheme-engravers.scm: 157: 20* (rest-eqv (quote measure-count)) /home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/scheme-engravers.scm:157:30: In express ion (rest-eqv (quote measure-count)): /home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/scheme-engravers.scm:157:30: Variable u sed before given a value: rest-eqv ~~~ --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sat May 20, 2017 06:04 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Add suspendRestMerging context property http://codereview.appspot.com/321930043 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Sat May 20, 2017 06:04 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Address review comments http://codereview.appspot.com/321930043 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Fri May 19, 2017 03:35 PM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- **assigned_to**: horndude77 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Thu May 18, 2017 11:51 AM UTC **Owner:** horndude77 *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
- Description has changed: Diff: - **Needs**: --> - **Patch**: new --> review - **Type**: --> Enhancement - **Comment**: Passes make, make check and a full make doc. --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Thu May 18, 2017 05:15 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Rebase, set tracker issue http://codereview.appspot.com/321930043 --- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Thu May 18, 2017 05:15 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
--- ** [issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration** **Status:** Started **Created:** Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Tue May 31, 2016 09:16 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody *Originally created by:* *anonymous *Originally created by:* [ralphbug...@gmail.com](http://code.google.com/u/106131861630194758622/) On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Could you implement the possibility: \override RestCollision \#'positioning-done = \#merge-rests-on-positioning described in [http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336](http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=336) \_directly\_ into LilyPond? So we would not have to define merge-rests-on-positioning ourselves, each time we want to use this function. This function \_is useful\_, as shown by the several messages asking for this on lilypond-user: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=Merging+rests+&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user) That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e. – ability to handle more than two voices ; >– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests. Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way: [http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-02/msg00452.html) --- Sent from sourceforge.net because testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/admin/issues/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Testlilyissues-auto mailing list testlilyissues-a...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/testlilyissues-auto
