problems with \cueDuring
I still have problems with the current implementation of cue note
support.
First, it is a major nuisance to create the `cue' voice manually,
because it should have the same number of beats as the other voices,
and it seems to me that this information can't be extracted
automatically dependent on other voices. What do you think of an
implicit cue voice which is created with, say,
\new Voice \with {
\consists Cue_engraver
\override Cue #'length = #5.5
...
}
Second, \cueDuring doesn't work correctly. A negative direction value
has no effect (see example below); additionally, the rests aren't
shifted vertically according to the direction.
BTW, \killCues works fine.
Werner
==
smaller = {
\set fontSize = #-2
\override Stem #'length = #5.5
\override Beam #'thickness = #0.384
\override Beam #'space-function =
#(lambda (beam mult) (* 0.8 (Beam::space_function beam mult)))
}
\addquote clarinet \relative {
r2 r8 c f f
}
\context Voice = cue {
\smaller \skip 1*2
}
\set Score.skipBars = ##t
\context Voice {
\cueDuring #clarinet #-1 { R1 }
g4 g2.
}
\layout {
raggedright = ##t
}
==
begin 644 cueDuring.png
MB5!.1PT*@[EMAIL PROTECTED],```!S`(```-7/=)!=!34$``+/
M_QA!0```#AT15AT4V]F='=A[EMAIL PROTECTED]VEO;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M,B\R.2\Y-`H4$Y'('!A=-H(#$N,BG=%2Y)```#:$E$051XVNW=S6ZK0`P
MT$Z5]W]E[B(JRB6$\(]MSMEUD4J!^8!DCKNNX'2.[7(0!)!B09D1`DD2
M`4D)!F09)!D0)(!208D209D1`DH426ZMM=:%4B[EMAIL PROTECTED]'=
M+-B0+\F#W'I)(*2OR7V,E67([EMAIL PROTECTED]GJ,-2LR4R)O(4+`F
M6R#[AHD4BH';I`U21SZ==`'I$^!JM_3A]/EW2S*?#]C1OYZLI[_Y#[G
M].0R]HCSM9_G6!F_VQD3I*[KGL?/0IREM.GC[NF35(,OA-;U*\K)Q9L3(
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@/+D`BR40/+75:,/O)4#O'X_^;A7_XQN8;U9R8$^R.HF
M4'YWS$?O*A?N-\VWW/\AQU-05W[KD?O$GN-?!(MS\*ZZQ4%.R%
MTW4M;KKE%FKR#C'9;Q6*F4J,VFZZ].J3:*R-IC:%2^3_IVH:!`_;AF%^K3
MXN[/$=1[*[/,S35G_PN%VHW?N3ML,N^]3C=][`Q5M8(NDY^+\A?Q^ON
M`SI10BR29KDHPNH8\D7]E`=EWWJFV__.V?:;[EMAIL PROTECTED])'E3.3X5T78=[ML3
M/;6GOR!K=[TTEDLS(,;4[.#L)T.!Z?BR_2O+ZD8?76N,K5HIW_EN*EXV_U
M1^PG5^NN!]]3]0YR(K1:ULE;2_?7\:[EMAIL PROTECTED]QDORRDPST0M:_O^Y\L(L
M(%_;(AW]$ITU\\PS[E5TT`YN3G:]R.X''Y2.K#/'[EMAIL PROTECTED]@C
M)GG[1#ZO_G1R[N??*-U,E!AGPGW2!]37:/%Q2IR8NBCB-UG6REEN,25^3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:.:;[EMAIL PROTECTED];/AA1:F!?=W;6]IM4XO:3TZ^3Q7C+
ML7+TK)-/'7_O-UVKQB8^DB7YY^6Q9')0.(DBRX47R#\WG8B`C,9M+?ON
M)]=K!M5D4)/AE.*\I1^^F'0L/[EMAIL PROTECTED]+E$MR5F]_FY3TFF
M;(Q',_SZ#ROUV-;)QVPMP_.W?^A)`,'[EMAIL PROTECTED]@Q(,B#)@2#)[EMAIL
PROTECTED](,D@
MR8`D`Y(,2#)(,B#)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@R(,F`)(,D`Y(,2#(@R2#)@[EMAIL
PROTECTED](,B#)
J4,D_(O+LX.TJUA$'=$E-10?4QT4.ARZ7\-0`$E%3D2N0F
`
end
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Example massacre
Hi, I have complained about this before, but I think it's a pity that som many useful examples have been removed from the Tips and Tricks document. In know that many of the examples that have been moved have been incorporated in the manual, but one thing doesn't have to exclude the other. One nice feature of the Tips and Tricks document is that it's so easy to browse through. Often, you find some useful hints or ideas on the way when you are looking for something else. However, the biggest problem for the moment is that the manual has links to at least one example files that have been removed. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Repeat-syntax.html#Repeat-syntax points to http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/input/regression/out-www/collated-files.html#volta-chord-names.ly which was removed in one of the big example file massacres some months ago. We should really go through all the old example files ones more and rethink if not more of them should be revived in the latest release. /Mats -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[bug] Ambitus broken as of 2.5.2
Hi! On the lilypond.org website, in section 5.11.7 of the notation manual, version 2.5.2, ambitus does not show noteheads. Maybe, this is also related to the introduction of the symmetric/up/down noteheads in 2.5.2? BTW., not only my Latin dictionary, but also Webster's says that the plural of ambitus is ambitus (with long u), not ambits. Greetings, Jürgen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: new markup remark.
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wouldn't mind of demanding that users write
\line
explicitly inside \column to go to horizontal mode again, ie.
\markup { \column { a b \bold { c d } e f }
=
\markup { \column { a b \bold c \bold d e f } }
I think this is more consistent. Of course, \markup should implicitly
enclose its argument in \line.
done.
\markup { a { b c } \bold { d e } f }
=
\markup { a b c \bold d \bold e f }
Corollary:
\markup \column { { a b } { c d } }
=
\markup \column { a b c d }
so one has to use \line to group markups on a line when using \column
and friends:
\markup \column { \line { first line } \line { second line } }
nicolas
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
