Re: No Bug nor Feature?
Alle 00:11, mercoledì 26 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: Don't be annoyed, you can get your money back if you want;-) Of course you didn't get the point and don't want to. I only said I think the program may lead to unwanted results. I'm not annoyed by Lilypond, i'm only annoyed by answers like read the manual or don't use lilypond when I warily report a bug. Bug reporting is a way to contribute to the project, too. Marco ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: using new fall and doit features in 2.9.13
Paul Scott wrote: Can someone tell me how to use the new fall and doit features. I guessed incorrectly \fall and \doit. Just like any new feature, go to the NEWS page in documentation and click the image. Regards -- John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: using new fall and doit features in 2.9.13
Hi Scott,
see example below.
Searching in usr\share\lilypond\current\ly for bendAfter lead me to
this.
HTH
Markus
%%% Begin Snippet
\version 2.9.12
\score {
{ f''4 \bendAfter #1 g'' r2
f''4 \bendAfter #2 g'' r2
\break
f''4 \bendAfter #-1 g'' r2
f''4 \bendAfter #-2 g'' r2 }
\layout {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 0\cm
}
}
%%% End Snippet
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: lilypond ChangeLog lily/instrument-name-engrave...
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
...
Index: lily/instrument-name-engraver.cc
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/lilypond/lilypond/lily/instrument-name-engraver.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.86
retrieving revision 1.87
diff -u -b -r1.86 -r1.87
--- lily/instrument-name-engraver.cc26 Jul 2006 11:40:14 - 1.86
+++ lily/instrument-name-engraver.cc26 Jul 2006 11:57:22 - 1.87
@@ -41,13 +41,13 @@
if (!text_spanner_)
{
SCM long_text = get_property (instrument);
Shouldn't this be instrumentName?
Greetings,
Juergen
@@ -115,9 +115,9 @@
/* read */
currentCommandColumn
- instr
- instrument
- vocNam
+ shortInstrumentName
+ instrumentName
+ shortVocalName
vocalName
,
...
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: confusion about version numbers
Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef: What does it mean that there are lilypond 2.8.5 binaries for some archs, but only source for 2.8.4? That I botched the source upload of 2.8.5 -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
List-culture [was] No Bug nor Feature?
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:26:33 +0200 Marco Gusy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alle 00:11, mercoledì 26 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: Don't be annoyed, you can get your money back if you want;-) Of course you didn't get the point and don't want to. I only said I think the program may lead to unwanted results. I'm not annoyed by Lilypond, i'm only annoyed by answers like read the manual or don't use lilypond when I warily report a bug. Bug reporting is a way to contribute to the project, too. I am sorry if I did not get the point. What I try to tell you is that working with list mail may be time consuming for developers and sentences like Anyway the problem is still more annoying, may better be stated as: Anyway it looks inappropriate to me that [...] I hope you get the point: friendly and positive mail-tone is essential for a mail-list cooperation. Do not assume that I do not want to understand your point. And excuse me if I am wrong, after all I (or others) could be helped to understand what you mean. Also excuse me if this is not the best way to help reaching a friendly atmosphere on this mail-list; I am trying as hard as I can but I may fail. I think your example on how weird accidental rules seem in some places is very good. Accidentals may seem odd even if it is the correct way these accidentals are placed. I do not think that the developers should change the accidental-rules. -- http://d-axel.dk/ -- Donald Axel, Consultant -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: confusion about version numbers
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef: What does it mean that there are lilypond 2.8.5 binaries for some archs, but only source for 2.8.4? That I botched the source upload of 2.8.5 I do that all the time. :) Does that mean that 2.8.5 was really released, but the source just didn't make it into the archive? I didn't even see a release announcement for it. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
lilypond Scheme syntax in ly/music-functions-init.ly
In lilypond 2.8.4, ly/music-functions-init.ly, there occurs the following snippet (we're using Guile 1.6.8): %% FIXME: guile-1.7 required? %#(use-modules (scm display-lily))invalid module name for use-syntax ((srfi srfi-39)) I am in fact seeing this error. Are there people successfully building lilypond using Guile 1.6.8? Thomas ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
