Re: Episema not showing
I'm somewhat out of my depth here, but the example in section 2.8.3.1 (2.1 NR) seems to try to draw a horizontal line over the notes using both a ligature and a text spanner. Neither work. It seems ligatures don't work in VaticanaVoice, and there is an interaction between the two which prevents the episema working too. If the ligatures, \[ and \], are removed the example works, and episema using \episemInitium and \episemFinis will work over a single note too. (Note \episemInitium is simply \startTextSpanner and \episemFinis is \stopTextSpanner) Trevor - Original Message - From: Eyolf Østrem [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:12 AM Subject: Episema not showing It is mentioned as one of the known issues in the ancient section of the documentation that The episema line is not displayed in many cases. That in itself does not make it very useful, but it's doubly bad when it doesn't even show up in the example that illustrates it. I also noticed that there is a bug report/enhancement request to allow for episemas over single notes, which I strongly support, since that is the most common way to use it (either over a single note, or over one of the notes in a ligature). Eyolf -- Q: Heard about the ethnic who couldn't spell? A: He spent the night in a warehouse. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Release text
xpdf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Mandereau pisze: On 2008/09/24 19:02 +0300, Till Rettig wrote: I would also translate the text, is the wiki a good place for that? It's a good place to do and polish the translation Polish translations or polish the translations? Polish the Czech translations, and check the Polish translations. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Three questions for ancient.itely
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:55:49 +0200 Eyolf __strem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. One of the known issues under flags states: The attachment of ancient flags to stems is slightly off due to a change in early 2.3.x. About time to fix that, is it...? Remember that nobody is maintaining the code for ancient music. If you can supply a patch, great! If not, then don't hold your breath. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Three questions for ancient.itely
On 25.09.2008 (04:09), Graham Percival wrote: Remember that nobody is maintaining the code for ancient music. If you can supply a patch, great! If not, then don't hold your breath. One can't remember sth one never knew. Now that I know, I'll start breathing again. e -- Aliquid melius quam pessimum optimum non est. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Three questions for ancient.itely
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:18:59 +0200 Von: Eyolf Østrem [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org Betreff: Re: Three questions for ancient.itely On 25.09.2008 (04:09), Graham Percival wrote: Remember that nobody is maintaining the code for ancient music. If you can supply a patch, great! If not, then don't hold your breath. One can't remember sth one never knew. Now that I know, I'll start breathing again. if you have some programming skills you can contact Juergen Reuter who wrote the code in the beginning. He doesn't seem to have much time himself but will help you out understanding what is going on and where to give it a start. I don't know if it is a c++ or a scheme issue. Till e -- Aliquid melius quam pessimum optimum non est. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
No texi2html
If I don't have installed texi2html and I'll prefer only to build and check the PDF docs, how must I proceed? /bin/sh: @TEXI2HTML@: not found ... make: *** [web] Error 2 Thanks -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No texi2html
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:25:53 +0200 Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I don't have installed texi2html and I'll prefer only to build and check the PDF docs, how must I proceed? You could probably use texi2pdf manually... but really, just install texi2html. Trying to avoid texi2html will waste more time (from everybody involved) than simply installing texi2hmlt. (it doens't need to be installed as root; just copy the final .pl script to ~/bin/ or whatnot) Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No texi2html
2008/9/25 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You could probably use texi2pdf manually... but really, just install texi2html. Trying to avoid texi2html will waste more time (from everybody involved) than simply installing texi2hmlt. (it doens't need to be installed as root; just copy the final .pl script to ~/bin/ or whatnot) For 'final' I guess you want to say that I have to compile it. Great. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No texi2html
2008/9/25 Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/9/25 Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You could probably use texi2pdf manually... but really, just install texi2html. Trying to avoid texi2html will waste more time (from everybody involved) than simply installing texi2hmlt. (it doens't need to be installed as root; just copy the final .pl script to ~/bin/ or whatnot) For 'final' I guess you want to say that I have to compile it. Great. Well, I have downloaded, compiled and installed it successfully, trust me, now what? /bin/sh: @TEXI2HTML@: not found -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No texi2html
2008/9/25 Francisco Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well, I have downloaded, compiled and installed it successfully, trust me, now what? /bin/sh: @TEXI2HTML@: not found I have rerun ./configure and triggered make clean make all, let's wait until it finishes, sorry for the noise. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[PATCH]: Fix #661: Unwanted TextScript offset when overriding TrillSpanner style (zigzag)
Hi there, Please review this patch here: http://codereview.appspot.com/6056 Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No texi2html
On 2008/09/25 15:25 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: If I don't have installed texi2html and I'll prefer only to build and check the PDF docs, how must I proceed? If you really don't want to install texi2html from CVS, rerun configure. If you want to only build (or rebuyild) the PDF docs (which is a completely different issue), do make web-1 This is a nice side effect of splitting docs building in 2 stages for the sake of generating node names maps for texi2html. HTH, John ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: [PATCH]: Fix #661: Unwanted TextScript offset when overriding TrillSpanner style (zigzag)
LGTM. On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Neil Puttock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, Please review this patch here: http://codereview.appspot.com/6056 Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No texi2html
2008/9/25 John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2008/09/25 15:25 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: If I don't have installed texi2html and I'll prefer only to build and check the PDF docs, how must I proceed? If you really don't want to install texi2html from CVS, rerun configure. Oh, it is installed, but the script doesn't find it, or something. $ whereis texi2html texi2html: /usr/local/bin/texi2html If you want to only build (or rebuyild) the PDF docs (which is a completely different issue), do I'd prefer not to 'need' something I don't really 'need'. So yes, this is my solution. But, now that it is installed, I'm curious... -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No texi2html
On 2008/09/26 00:45 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: 2008/9/25 John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you really don't want to install texi2html from CVS, rerun configure. Oh, it is installed, but the script doesn't find it, or something. $ whereis texi2html texi2html: /usr/local/bin/texi2html Is /usr/local/bin in your PATH (configure generally only look for executables in the PATH)? Which texi2html version is it? If it's not a recent CVS snapshot, LilyPond's make system will ignore it. Cheers, John ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Distances and measurements
Hi Trevor,
I noticed your doc update for Distances and measurements, and it
looks really great!
I have two suggestions to further improve this section:
1) The `pt' unit is actually 1/72.27 inch, which is the TeX point.
2) Staff-space can be used as a unit too in the \paper and \layout blocks:
\paper {
top-margin = 5\staff-space
bottom-margin = 10\staff-space
}
Thanks,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No texi2html
2008/9/26 John Mandereau [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is /usr/local/bin in your PATH (configure generally only look for executables in the PATH)? $ echo $PATH /home/fravd/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games Which texi2html version is it? If it's not a recent CVS snapshot, LilyPond's make system will ignore it. $ texi2html --version 1.79 -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
the docs need a link back to the main directory
Once a user navigates into the docs from the main directory... http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/ ... there's no link back, so if I'm in NR and I want to go to IR, I'mforced to either a) keep pressing the back button or b) highlight and delete stuff from the address bar. If I'm in NR and I click the Top link, I frustratingly get the top of NR, not the top of the entire Documentation, and there's no Up link from there. I know I mentioned this before*, but even with all the fantastic work everyone's done, little things like this are frustrating, especially to potential future LilyPond users, who we don't want to lose. Thanks, Mark * http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-09/msg00715.html ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
